CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Equity advocates using equity-mindedness to interrupt faculty hiring's racial structure

Tác giả

LIERA R.

Năm xuất bản

2020

Source title

Teachers College Record

Số trích dẫn

21

DOI

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105936131&partnerID=40&md5=f93f40e0c7a1af071e35b0ae6e2aa2c1

Tóm tắt

Background/Context: Education scholars have recommended steps for college and university leaders to take toward creating a more racially diverse professoriate. However, the majority of the scholarship is neither empirical nor focused on faculty actively negotiating barriers during search committee meetings to create equitable practices. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: The study examined faculty within search committees who received formal training to interrogate exclusionary hiring procedures and create race-conscious and equitable hiring practices. My goals were to understand the strategies and efforts to advance racial equity of faculty trained on equity-mindedness to negotiate and use practices to change exclusionary hiring procedures. Thus, I answer the following research questions: (1) How do professors enact their agency to create equitable hiring practices during faculty search committee meetings? (2) What challenges do professors encounter when using equity-minded practices during faculty search committees? How do professors overcome such challenges? Setting: The study site was a religiously affiliated private liberal arts university with a predominantly White student and faculty population. Senior administrators invested resources in a ten-month intervention to train 17 faculty to advance racial equity in faculty hiring. Population/Participants/Subjects: Study participants consisted of 10 faculty members whose university leadership designated them as advocates of racial equity on search committees. Research Design: Data for this critical narrative analysis were collected through eight interviews with faculty equity advocates, observations of two faculty search committees, and documents of hiring materials such as hiring criteria, interview questions, and evaluation rubrics. Findings/Results: Ultimately, faculty enacted their agency to deactivate exclusionary practices and inscribe new rules for search committees to follow. The findings illustrate that faculty agency for racial equity is an effort to establish positional power, to use equity-minded practices, and to informally strategize to overcome resistance as members of faculty search committees. Conclusions/Recommendations: I conclude that faculty advance racial equity by manipulating and subverting practices (e.g., recruitment strategies, evaluation criteria), rules (e.g., conversations about race), and roles (e.g., legitimate roles as committee members, who have the knowledge to integrate equity-mindedness) that historically excluded racially minoritized professors from the hiring process. Study findings suggest for senior administrators to train faculty search committee members on taking active steps to create an equity-minded evaluation system, including the appointment of people who are explicitly trained to advocate for equity in the evaluation process. © 2020 Teachers College, Columbia University. All rights reserved.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Beattie G., Cohen D., McGuire L., An exploration of possible unconscious ethnic biases in higher education: The role of implicit attitudes on selection for university posts, Semiotica, 197, pp. 171-201, (2013); Bensimon E. M., The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success, The Review of Higher Education, 30, 4, pp. 441-469, (2007); Bensimon E. M., The equity scorecard: Theory of change, Confronting equity issues on campus: Implementing the equity scorecard in theory and practice, pp. 17-44, (2012); Bensimon E. M., Malcom L., Confronting equity issues on campus: Implementing the equity scorecard in theory and practice, Stylus, (2012); Bertrand M., Mullainathan S., Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination, The American Economic Review, 94, 4, pp. 991-1013, (2004); Bustillos L. T., Rueda R., Bensimon E. M., Faculty views of underrepresented students in community college settings: Cultural models and cultural practices, Vygotsky in 21st century society: Advances in cultural historical theory and praxis with non-dominant communities, pp. 199-213, (2011); Cabrera N. L., Where is the racial theory in critical race theory?: A constructive criticism of the crits, The Review of Higher Education, 42, 1, pp. 209-233, (2018); Campbell C. M., O'Meara K. A., Faculty agency: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers, Research in Higher Education, 55, 1, pp. 49-74, (2014); Ching C. D., Confronting the equity "learning problem" through practitioner inquiry, The Review of Higher Education, 41, 3, pp. 387-421, (2018); Daiute C., Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach, (2014); Delgado Bernal D., Villalpando O., An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the "legitimate" knowledge of faculty of color, Equity & Excellence in Education, 35, 2, pp. 169-180, (2002); Delgado Bernal D., Burciaga R., Carmona J. F., Chicana/Latina testimonies: Mapping the methodological, pedagogical, and political, Equity & Excellence in Education, 45, 3, pp. 363-372, (2012); Dowd A. C., Bensimon E. M., Engaging the "race question": Accountability and equity in U.S. higher education, (2015); Dowd A. C., Bishop R., Bensimon E. M., Critical action research on race and equity in higher education, Critical approaches to the study of higher education: A practical introduction, pp. 174-192, (2015); Dowd A. C., Liera R., Sustaining organizational change towards racial equity through cycles of inquiry, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 65, pp. 1-46, (2018); Eaton A. A., Saunders J. F., Jacobson R. K., West K., How gender and race stereotypes impact the achievement of scholars in STEM: Professors' biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates, Sex Roles, pp. 1-15, (2019); Ford K. A., Race, gender, and bodily (mis)recognitions: Women of color faculty experiences with White students in college classrooms, The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 4, pp. 444-478, (2011); Fujimoto E. O., Hiring diverse faculty members in community college: A case study in ethical decision making, Community College Review, 40, 3, pp. 255-274, (2012); Gasman M., Kim J., Nguyen T. -H., Effectively recruiting faculty of color at highly selective institutions: A school of education case study, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4, 4, pp. 212-222, (2011); Gonzales L. D., Framing faculty agency inside striving universities: An application of Bourdieu's theory of practice, The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 2, pp. 193-218, (2014); Gonzales L. D., Subverting and minding boundaries: The intellectual work of women, The Journal of Higher Education, 89, 5, pp. 677-701, (2018); Kelly B. T., Gayles J. G., Williams C. D., Recruitment without retention: A critical case of Black faculty unrest, The Journal of Negro Education, 86, 3, pp. 305-317, (2017); Lamont M., How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgement, (2009); Liera R., Ching C., Reconceptualizing "merit" and "fit": An equity-minded approach to hiring, Administration for social justice and equity in higher education: Critical perspectives for leadership and decision-making, (2020); Liera R., Dowd A. C., Faculty learning at boundaries to broker racial equity, The Journal of Higher Education, 90, 3, pp. 462-485, (2019); Maxwell J. A., Qualitative research design: An interactive approach, (2013); Meizlish D., Kaplan M., Valuing and evaluating teaching in academic hiring: A multidisciplinary, cross-institutional study, The Journal of Higher Education, 79, 5, pp. 489-512, (2008); Munoz S. M., Basile V., Gonzalez J., Birmingham D., Aragon A., Jennings L., Gloeckner G., (Counter)narratives and complexities: Critical perspectives from a university cluster hire focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion, Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis, 6, 2, pp. 1-21, (2017); Museus S. D., Ledesma M. C., Parker T. L., Racism and racial equity in higher education, ASHE Higher Education Report, 42, 1, pp. 1-112, (2015); Neumann A., Pallas A. M., Critical policy analysis, the craft of qualitative research, and analysis of data on the Texas top 10% law, Critical approaches to the study of higher education: A practical introduction, pp. 153-173, (2015); O'Meara K., Terosky A. L., Neumann A., Setting the stage, ASHE Higher Education Report, 34, 3, pp. 1-221, (2008); Omi M., Winant H., Racial formation in the United States, (2015); Patton L. D., Disrupting postsecondary prose: Toward a critical race theory of higher education, Urban Education, 51, 3, pp. 315-342, (2016); Patton M., Qualitative evaluation and research methods, (1990); Pena E. V., Inquiry methods for critical consciousness and self-change in faculty, The Review of Higher Education, 36, 1, pp. 69-92, (2012); Phillips R., Recruiting and retaining a diverse faculty, Planning in Higher Education, 30, pp. 32-39, (2004); Posselt J. R., Inside graduate admissions: Merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping, (2016); Posselt J. R., Porter K., Reyes K. A., Organizational pathways toward gender equity in doctoral education: Chemistry and civil engineering compared, American Journal of Education, 124, 4, pp. 383-410, (2018); Posselt J. R., Reyes K. A., Slay K. E., Kamimura A., Porter K., Equity efforts as boundary work: How symbolic and social boundaries shape access & inclusion in graduate education, Teachers College Record, 119, 10, pp. 1-38, (2017); Quaye S. J., Shaw M. D., Hill D. H., Blending scholar and activist identities: Establishing the need for scholar activism, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10, 4, pp. 381-399, (2017); Ray V., A theory of racialized organizations, American Sociological Review, pp. 1-28, (2019); Rivera L. A., When two bodies are [not] a problem: Gender and relationship status discrimination in academic hiring, American Sociological Association, pp. 1-28, (2017); Saldana J., The coding manual for qualitative researchers, (2013); Sensoy O, DiAngelo R., We are all for diversity, but . . . ": How faculty hiring committees reproduce Whiteness and practical suggestions for how they can change, Harvard Educational Review, 87, 4, pp. 557-581, (2017); Smith D. G., Turner C. S. V., Osei-Kofi N., Richards S., Interrupting the unusual: Successful strategies for hiring diverse faculty, The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 2, pp. 133-160, (2004); Souto-Manning M., Critical narrative analysis: The interplay of critical discourse and narrative analyses, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 2, pp. 159-180, (2014); Sule V. T., Enact, discard, and transform: A critical race feminist perspective on professional socialization among tenured Black female faculty, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 4, pp. 432-453, (2014); Tomlinson G., Freeman S., Who really selected you? Insights into faculty selection processes in top-ranked higher education graduate programmes, Journal of Further and Higher Education, pp. 1-14, (2017); Tuitt F. A., Danowitz Sagaria M. A., Turner C. S. V., Signals and strategies in hiring faculty of color, Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, xxii, pp. 497-535, (2007); Turner C. S. V., Diversifying the faculty: A guidebook for search committees, (2002); Turner C. S., Gonzalez J. C., Wood J. L., Faculty of color in academe: What 20 years of literature tells us, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1, 3, pp. 139-168, (2008); Developing Hispanic-Serving institutions Program- Title V, (2016); The Condition of Education 2016 (NCES 2016-144), (2016); Villalpando V., Delgado-Bernal D., A critical race theory analysis of barriers that impede the success of faculty of color, The racial crisis in American higher education, pp. 243-269, (2002); White-Lewis D. K., The façade of fit in faculty search processes, Journal of Higher Education, (2020); Zuberi T., Bonilla-Silva E., White logic, White methods: Racism and methodology, (2008)

Nơi xuất bản

Teachers College, Columbia University

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus