CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Designing STEAM Education: Fostering Relationality through Design-Led Disruption

Tác giả

MacDonald A.; Wise K.; Tregloan K.; Fountain W.; Wallis L.; Holmstrom N.

Năm xuất bản

2020

Source title

International Journal of Art and Design Education

Số trích dẫn

11

DOI

10.1111/jade.12258

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075076479&doi=10.1111%2fjade.12258&partnerID=40&md5=19a29a30c0dda7e2f9f627dcc6fbf2d9

Tóm tắt

A significant contention underpinning the commentary around STEM / STEAM is the evidence of discipline hierarchies, and inherent binary perspectives and/or biases that lend themselves to privileging one or more disciplines over another in an interdisciplinary education context. The current focus on increasing engagement with STEM in Australian schools provides opportunities to explore how the creative and liberal arts, and arts-based approaches to teaching and learning are being adopted to significantly enhance teaching and learning outcomes in and for STEM education. This article examines how design for a STEAM education programme evolves and is adopted in an Australian context. Tasmania represents one of the most vibrant creative communities in Australia. At the same time it has one of the lowest levels of educational attainment. Entrenched teaching habits and disciplinary hierarchies often create significant barriers to the implementation of STEAM despite genuine goodwill and enthusiasm for STEAM among teachers and within schools. This article argues that, despite the contrasting dynamics extant in the Tasmanian educational context, it is here that some of the nation’s most curious and exciting examples of STEAM teaching and learning have emerged. It offers an example of an innovative learning project and proposes the means by which these disciplinary strands have been effectively entwined. © 2019 NSEAD and John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Từ khóa

collaborative inquiry; experiential learning; inter-disciplinary curriculum; relational pedagogy; STEAM

Tài liệu tham khảo

Akhtar-Khavari A., Richardson B.J., Ecological restoration and the law: recovering nature’s past for the future, Griffith Law Review, 26, 2, pp. 147-153, (2017); Allen J.M., Wright S., Cranston N., Watson J., Beswick K., Hay I., Raising levels of school student engagement and retention in rural, regional and disadvantaged areas: is it a lost cause?, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22, 4, pp. 409-425, (2018); Bequette J.W., Bequette M.B., A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation, Art Education, 65, 2, pp. 40-47, (2012); Bailey M., Working at the edges, Networks, 11, pp. 42-45, (2010); Bousbaci R., Models of man in design thinking: the bounded relationality episode, Design Issues, 24, 4, pp. 38-52, (2008); Burnham R., Wallis L., Learning by making: long-term collaborations and socially productive outcomes, Journal of Public Space, 2, 3, pp. 73-84, (2017); Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics (STEM) information (online), (2014); Carey C., Matlay H., Creative disciplines education: a model for assessing ideas in entrepreneurship education?, Education+Training, 52, 9, pp. 694-709, (2010); Colucci-Gray L., Burnard P., Davies R., Stuart Gray D., Reviewing the Potential and Challenges of Developing STEAM Education through Creative Pedagogies for 21st Learning: How Can School Curricula be Broadened towards a More Responsive, Dynamic and Inclusive Form of Education, British Association for Research in Education (BERA) research commission (online), (2017); What’s the Economic State of Our States? (online), (2018); Cross N., Designerly Ways of Knowing, (2006); Cunningham M., From STEM to STEAM: The Potential for Arts to Facilitate Innovation, Literacy, and Participative Democracy, (2014); Cunningham S., An Exploding Creative Economy Shows Innovation Policy Shouldn’t Focus Only on STEM, The Conversation, (2018); Davies M., Devlin M., Interdisciplinary higher education, Interdisciplinary Higher Education: Perspectives and Practicalities, pp. 3-28, (2010); English L.D., STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration, International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 1, pp. 3-14, (2016); Grimmer L., Re-inventing Central Launceston: creating a vibrant and thriving regional city, ABC Radio, Tasmanian Northern Breakfast Program with Belinda King, (2017); Harris A., Creativity and Education, (2016); Harris A., de Bruin L., STEAM Education: fostering creativity in and beyond secondary schools, Australian Art Education, 38, 1, pp. 54-68, (2017); Jagodzinski J., The challenges of art education in designer capitalism: collaborative practices in the (new media) arts, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34, 3, pp. 282-295, (2015); Jonas W., A theory of what?, Mind the gap! On Knowing and Not-Knowing in Design, pp. 178-211, (2004); Nightlight: Species Hotel – a Game Lab (online), (2017); Lawson B., How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, (1997); Lehman K.F., Reiser D., The nexus between an art experience and creative tourism: Tasmania’s Museum of Old and New Art, Mondes du Tourisme, 10, 2, pp. 19-32, (2014); Liao C., From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: an arts-integrated approach to STEAM education, Art Education, 69, 6, pp. 44-49, (2016); MacDonald A., Hunter J., Wise K., Fraser S., STEM and STEAM and the spaces between: an overview of education agendas pertaining to disciplinarity across three Australian states, Journal of Research in STEM Education, 5, 1, pp. 75-92, (2019); MacDonald A., Wise K., Stemming the flow of STEAM, Loud Mouth - Music Trust E-Zine, (2018); Marshall J., Transdisciplinarity and art integration: toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum, Studies in Art Education, 55, 2, pp. 104-127, (2014); Maslyk J., STEAM Makers: Fostering Creativity and Innovation in the Elementary Classroom, (2016); Meyer J., Land R., Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge, (2006); Moon J., A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning, (2004); Morrow R., Live project love: building a framework for live projects, Architecture Live Projects: Pedagogy into Practice, pp. xviii-xxiii, (2014); Arts Educators Call for a Visionary Approach to Arts Education and Creative Work, media release (online), (2018); Nicolescu B., The Transdisciplinary Evolution of the University: Condition for Sustainable Development, International Center for Transdisciplinary Research, (1997); Radziwill N.M., Benton M.C., Moellers C., From STEM to STEAM: Reframing what it means to learn, The STEAM Journal, 2, 1, (2015); Richardson B.J., Restoring layered geographies: ecology, society and time, Griffith Law Review, 26, 2, pp. 154-177, (2017); Salama A., Spatial Design Education: New Directions for Pedagogy in Architecture and Beyond, (2015); Simon H., The Sciences of the Artificial, (1996); Smith A., STEM has become a buzzword and a fad: NSW education minister, Sydney Morning Herald, (2018); Stratford E., Field M., Grant O., Ambrose K., Summary of Insights of Three Round-Figure Discussions on Educational Attainment in Tasmania Incorporating the Involvement of Honourable Henry De Sio Jr. (online), (2016); Wenger E., Communities of Practice: Learning, Making and Identity, (1999); Yakman G., Lee H., Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the US as a practical educational framework for Korea, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32, 6, pp. 1072-1086, (2012)

Nơi xuất bản

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

All Open Access; Green Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus