CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Organisation-based self-esteem in higher education: exploring subgroup differences in perceptions of worth

Tác giả

Cameron C.L.

Năm xuất bản

2020

Source title

Quality in Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

0

DOI

10.1080/13538322.2020.1751308

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85084322459&doi=10.1080%2f13538322.2020.1751308&partnerID=40&md5=8911bc4029cbfb941531304e0047ffee

Tóm tắt

To date there is limited research on organisation-based self-esteem within the higher education environment. This quantitative study addresses that gap by investigating the differences in organisation-based self-esteem between two subgroups: academic teaching staff (‘faculty’ in the United States) and administrative staff, excluding senior managers, (‘staff’ in the United States). Through analysis of variance and factor analyses of 233 survey respondents across five small liberal arts institutions in North Eastern United States, this study suggests self-esteem imbalances between the two subgroups. Results point towards subgroup inequities in perceived value that can lead to reduced engagement, commitment and positive organisational behaviours. The study offers organisation-based self-esteem as a new data point for institutions striving to provide the best outcomes for students and the employee groups that support them. It provides targeted interventions and challenges academic organisations to reflect on processes and cultural norms that may be negatively affecting students and employees. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Từ khóa

academic subcultures; employee engagement; global self-esteem; higher education; Organisation-based self-esteem

Tài liệu tham khảo

Applegate R., Deconstructing faculty status: research and assumptions, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 19, 3, pp. 158-164, (1993); Attewell P., Lavin D., Domina T., Levey T., New evidence on college remediation, Journal of Higher Education, 77, 5, pp. 886-924, (2006); Austin A.E., Faculty cultures, faculty values, New Directions for Institutional Research, 68, Winter, pp. 61-74, (1990); Bouckenooghe D., Positioning change recipients’ attitudes toward change in the organizational change literature, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26, 4, pp. 500-531, (2010); Bowling N.A., Eschleman K.J., Qiang W., Kirkendall C., Alarcon G., A meta-analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization-based self-esteem, Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 83, 3, pp. 601-626, (2010); Bowman R.F., The need to trust and to trust more wisely in academe, Education, 132, 4, pp. 907-914, (2012); Butrymowicz S., Most colleges enroll students who aren’t prepared for higher education, (2017); Cameron C., Faculty and staff perceptions of value: a qualitative approach to identifying institutional influences, paper presented at the Eastern Academy of Management Annual Conference, Provident, RI, (2018); Carpenter R.L., All on the same page? Contrasting faculty and staff perceptions of university commitment to diversity, paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, (2009); Carson K.D., Carson P.P., The effects of organization-based self-esteem on workplace outcomes: an examination of emergency medical technicians, Public Personnel Management, 26, 1, (1997); Chronicle Data: Pennsylvania. Available at , (2017); Clift R.T., Shifting roles, shifting contexts, maintaining identity, Studying Teacher Education, 7, 2, pp. 159-170, (2011); Conger J.A., Kanungo R.N., The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice, Academy of Management Review, 13, 3, pp. 471-482, (1988); Conley D.T., Rethinking college readiness, New Directions for Higher Education, 2008, 144, pp. 3-13, (2008); Dill D., The management of academic culture revisited: integrating universities in an entreprenuerial age, Managing Reform in Universities: The dynamics of culture, identity and organisational change, (2012); Dobson I.R., Conway M., Fear and loathing in university staffing: the case of Australian academic and general staff, Higher Education Management and Policy, 15, 3, pp. 123-133, (2003); Eddy P., Hart J., Faculty in the hinterlands: cultural anticipation and cultural reality, Higher Education, 63, 6, pp. 751-769, (2012); Farahmandian S., Minavand H., Afshardost M., Perceived service quality and student satisfaction in higher education, Journal of Business and Management, 12, 4, pp. 65-74, (2013); Flyvbjerg B., Curbing optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation in planning: reference class forecasting in practice, European Planning Studies, 16, 1, pp. 3-21, (2007); Fuller J.B., Barnett T., Hester K., Relyea C., A social identity perspective on the relationship netween perceived organizational support and organizational commitment, Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 6, pp. 789-791, (2003); Gardner D.G., Pierce J.L., Organization-based self-esteem: making a difference at work, Leading The Positive Organization: Actions, tools, and processes, (2016); Gardner D.G., Guo-Hua H., Xiongying N.I.U., Pierce J.L., Lee C., Organization-based self-esteem, pyschological contract fulfillment, and perceived employment opportunities: a test of self-regulatory theory, Human Resource Management, 54, 6, pp. 933-953, (2015); Gardner D.G., Pierce J.L., Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context, Group & Organization Management, 23, 1, pp. 48-70, (1998); Gardner D.G., Pierce J.L., Organization-based self-esteem in work teams, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 3, pp. 394-408, (2016); Gardner D.G., Van Dyne L., Pierce J.L., The effects of pay level on organization-based self-esteem and performance: a field study, Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77, 3, pp. 307-322, (2004); Graham C., Hearing the voices of general staff: a Delphi study of the contributions of general staff to student outcomes, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32, 3, pp. 213-223, (2010); Graham C., Transforming spaces and identities: the contributions of professional staff to learning spaces in higher education, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34, 4, pp. 437-452, (2012); Grant A.M., The significance of task significance: job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1, pp. 108-124, (2008); Greaves J., Sorenson R.C., Barriers to transformation in a higher education organization: observations and implications for OD professionals, Public Administration Quarterly, Spring, pp. 104-129, (1999); Holterman A., Mental mealth problems for college students are increasing, Healthline, (2016); Hui C., Lee C., Moderating effects of organization-based self-esteem on organizational uncertainty: employee response relationships, Journal of Management, 26, 2, pp. 215-232, (2000); Hui-Min K., Understanding relationships between academic staff and administrators: an organisational culture perspective, Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 31, 1, pp. 43-54, (2009); Izwar Ibrahim H., The relationship between job stress, co-worker support and organization-based self-esteem: a survey across different occupations, International Refereed Research Journal, 2, pp. 69-78, (2014); Jaewon L., An analysis of the antecedents of organization-based self-esteem in two Korean banks, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 6, pp. 1046-1066, (2003); Kuh G.D., Whitt E.J., The invisible tapestry. Culture in american colleges and universities, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education, Report No. 1, (1988); Levinson H., Wither academia?, Psychologist-Manager Journal, 13, 4, pp. 210-222, (2010); Long C., Li Z., Ning Z., Exploring the nonlinear relationship between challenge stressors and employee voice: the effects of leader–member exchange and organisation-based self-esteem, Personality and Individual Differences, 83, pp. 24-30, (2015); Mattingly P., American Academic Cultures: A history of higher education, (2017); Mayer B., Whitfield A., Godkin L., Promoting organization-based self-esteem in an organization: the role of organizational climate variables, Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 16, 1, pp. 81-96, (2001); Mintzberg H., Structure in Fives: Designing effective organizations, (1993); Muechur Karp M., Toward a new understanding of non-academic student support: four mechanisms encouraging positive student outcomes in the community college, CCRC Working Paper, (2011); Pan X.-F., Qin Q., Gao F., Psychological ownership, organization-based self-esteem and positive organizational behaviors, Chinese Management Studies, 8, 1, pp. 127-148, (2014); Panaccio A., Vandenberghe C., The relationships of role clarity and organization-based self-esteem to commitment to supervisors and organizations and turnover intentions, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 6, pp. 1455-1485, (2011); Pham H.T., Tanner K., Collaboration between academics and library staff: a structurationist perspective, Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 46, 1, pp. 2-18, (2015); Pierce J.L., Gardner D.G., Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: a review of the organization-based self-esteem literature, Journal of Management, 30, 5, pp. 591-622, (2004); Pierce J.L., Gardner D.G., Crowley C., Organization-based self-esteem and well-being: empiral examination of a spillover effect, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 2, pp. 1-19, (2015); Pierce J.L., Gardner D.G., Cummings L.L., Dunham R.B., Organization-based self-esteem: a construct definition, measurement, and validation, Academy of Management Journal, 32, 3, pp. 622-648, (1989); Regan J.-A., Dollard E., Banks N., A comparative study of the perceptions of professional staff on their contribution to student outcomes, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36, 5, pp. 533-545, (2014); Rogers K.M., Ashforth B.E., Respect in organizations: feeling valued as “we” and “me”’, Journal of Management, 43(5), pp. 1578–1608., (2014); Rowland S., 56, 1, pp. 52-64, (2002); Sallee M.W., Ideal for whom? A cultural analysis of ideal worker norms in higher education and student affairs graduate programs, New Directions for Higher Education, 2016, 176, pp. 53-67, (2016); Seltzer R., Discounting hits new high, Inside Higher Ed, (2016); Skaggs M.L., The great divide: the perceptions and dynamics of the faculty and staff professional relationship, Dissertations, Paper 74, (2015); Smerek R.E., ‘Cultural perspectives of academia, toward a model of cultural complexity’, 25, pp. 381-423, (2010); Spears V.P., Feeling valued at work linked to well-being and performance, Employee Benefit Plan Review, 66, 11, (2012); Thomas J.C., Administrative, faculty, and staff perceptions of organizational climate and commitment in christian higher education, Christian Higher Education, 7, 3, pp. 226-252, (2008); Tierney W.G., Organizational culture in higher education: defining the essentials, Journal of Higher Education, 59, 1, pp. 2-21, (1988); Turk J.L., The landscape of the contemporary university, Canadian Journal of Communication, 42, 1, pp. 3-12, (2017); Vranjes T., Held in high regard, HR Magazine, 59, 11, pp. 54-56, (2014); Whitchurch C., Harvey L., Cultural considerations, Higher Education Quarterly, 67, 2, pp. 108-110, (2013); Yang Z., Zhang H., Kwan H.K., Chen S., Crossover effects of servant leadership and job social support on employee spouses: the mediating role of employee organization-based self-esteem, Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 3, pp. 595-604, (2018); Yanhan Z.H.U., Organization-based self-esteem affects employees’ exchange relationship perceptions and extrarole behavior, Social Behavior & Personality, 44, 3, pp. 509-518, (2016); Zell E., Alicke M.D., Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 3, pp. 467-482, (2009)

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus