CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Reducing the environmental impact of food service in universities using life cycle assessment

Tác giả

Sherry J.; Tivona S.

Năm xuất bản

2022

Source title

International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

4

DOI

10.1108/IJSHE-06-2021-0224

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125794018&doi=10.1108%2fIJSHE-06-2021-0224&partnerID=40&md5=9031819f78c484ac9053d82cef515077

Tóm tắt

Purpose: This study aims to use life cycle assessment to determine the environmental impact of food purchases at a small, liberal arts college. The authors also use the results to develop a simple decision-making tool for college and university dining services administrators, attempting to make their food purchases more sustainable. Design/methodology/approach: Life cycle assessment was used to analyze the global warming potential (GWP) of all food products purchased at a college café during a four-month study period. Findings: The authors found the top ten highest impact products accounted for 40% of orders by weight, but 80% of the GWP. In particular, beef and cheese exhibited the highest GWP/kg. These findings highlight the importance of considering the carbon intensity of food products when making purchasing decisions. The authors also examined the carbon intensity and cost of common meal options and developed a carbon intensity comparison heuristic that can assist in making food purchasing decisions with the goal of lowering the GWP of food purchases. Practical implications: The results of this study show that life cycle assessment is a useful tool for university food service operations seeking to reduce environmental impact. The carbon intensity food comparison heuristic based upon this data serves as a helpful decision-making tool in guiding food service to reduce GWP. Originality/value: While life cycle assessment has typically been used to analyze individual food products, this study demonstrates its use as a decision-making tool to guide purchasing decisions across an entire array of food purchases. © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Từ khóa

Campus sustainability; Colleges; Food choices; Food service; Life cycle assessment; Universities

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baldwin C., Wilberforce N., Kapur A., Restaurant and food service life cycle assessment and development of a sustainability standard, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16, 1, pp. 40-49, (2011); Brinkhurst M., Rose P., Maurice G., Ackerman J.D., Achieving campus sustainability: top?down, bottom?up, or neither?, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12, 4, pp. 338-354, (2011); Campbell-Arvai V., Food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours among university undergraduates, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16, 3, pp. 279-295, (2015); Chen C.-J.R., Gregoire M.B., Arendt S., Shelley M.C., College and university dining services administrators’ intention to adopt sustainable practices, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12, 2, pp. 145-162, (2011); Cleveland D.A., Jay J.A., Integrating climate and food policies in higher education: a case study of the university of California, Climate Policy, pp. 16-32, (2020); Cusack D.F., Kazanski C.E., Hedgpeth A., Chow K., Cordeiro A.L., Karpman J., Ryals R., Reducing climate impacts of beef production: a synthesis of life cycle assessments across management systems and global regions, Global Change Biology, 27, 9, pp. 1721-1736, (2021); Darkow I.L., Foerster B., Von Der Gracht H.A., Sustainability in food service supply chains: future expectations from European industry experts toward the environmental perspective, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20, 2, pp. 163-178, (2015); Durlinger B., Koukouna E., Broekema R., van Paassen M., Scholten J., Agri-Footprint 4.0, (2017); Food recovery hierarchy, (2022); Greenhouse gas emissions from a typical passenger vehicle, (2022); CFR – code of federal regulations title 21, (2020); Herrero M., Henderson B., Havlik P., Thornton P.K., Conant R.T., Smith P., Wirsenius S., Hristov A.N., Gerber P., Gill M., Butterbach-Bahl K., Valin H., Garnett T., Stehfest E., Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector, Nature Climate Change, 6, 5, pp. 452-461, (2016); Hoolohan C., McLachlan C., Jones C., Larkin A., Birch C., Mander S., Broderick J., Responding to the climate emergency: how are UK universities establishing sustainable workplace routines for flying and food?, Climate Policy, 21, 7, pp. 853-867, (2021); Ingwersen W.W., Curran M.A., Gonzalez M.A., Hawkins T.R., Using screening level environmental life cycle assessment to aid decision making, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13, 1, pp. 6-18, (2012); ISO 14040: Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework, (2006); Summary for policymakers, Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, (2019); Lea E., Worsley A., Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours, Appetite, 50, 2-3, pp. 207-214, (2008); Levy B.L.M., Marans R.W., Towards a campus culture of environmental sustainability, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13, 4, pp. 365-377, (2012); Li X., Tan H., Rackes A., Carbon footprint analysis of student behavior for a sustainable university campus in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, pp. 97-108, (2015); U.S. Life cycle inventory database, (2012); Nijdam D., Rood T., Westhoek H., The price of protein: review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes, Food Policy, 37, 6, pp. 760-770, (2012); Oostindjer M., Aschemann-Witzel J., Wang Q., Skuland S.E., Egelandsdal B., Amdam G.V., Schjoll A., Pachucki M.C., Rozin P., Stein J., Almli V.L., Kleef E.V., Are school meals a viable and sustainable tool to improve the healthiness and sustainability of children's diet and food consumption? A cross-national comparative perspective, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57, 18, pp. 3942-3958, (2017); Osborne J.L., Hoggett R., Fraser S., McCann H., Mucklow P., Nowell C., Seaman A., Fletcher P., Sanders T., Davies G., Huke A., Richards A., Lenton T., Moebius W., Devine-Wright P., Barr S., Cox P., Cochrane R., Boehm S., Hartley S., Aebischer P., Whyte N., Morrissey K., Dillon J., Saintier S., Venn A., Rutterford L., Hoyle P., Monaghan E., Redman S., Rigby J., University of Exeter: environment and climate emergency working group white paper, pp. 1-53, (2019); Pirog R., Benjamin A., Checking the Food Odometer: Comparing Food Miles for Local versus Conventional Produce Sales to IA Institutions, (2003); Rotz C.A., Asem-Hiabliea S., Place S., Thoma G., Environmental footprints of beef cattle production in the United States, Agricultural Systems, 169, pp. 1-13, (2019); Sherry J., The impact of community sustainability: a life cycle assessment of three eco villages, Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, (2019); Silva E., Klink J., McKinney E., Price J., Deming P., Rivedal H., Colquhoun J., Attitudes of dining customers towards sustainability-related food values at a public university campus, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 35, 3, pp. 221-226, (2020); Sinha P., Schew W.A., Sawant A., Kolwaite K.J., Strode S.A., Greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. institutions of higher education, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 60, 5, pp. 568-573, (2010); Smith P., Gregory P.J., Climate change and sustainable food production, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 72, 1, pp. 21-28, (2013); Steinfeld H., Wassenaar T., The role of livestock production in carbon and nitrogen cycles, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 1, pp. 271-294, (2007); Thurston M., Eckelman M.J., Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from university purchases, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12, 3, pp. 225-235, (2011); Udas E., Wolk M., Wilmking M., The ‘carbon-neutral university’ – a study from Germany, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19, 1, pp. 130-145, (2018); 2017 census of agriculture, (2017); Utaraskul T., Carbon footprint of environmental science students in Suan Sunandha Rajabhat university, Thailand, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, pp. 1156-1160, (2015); Wahlen S., Heiskanen E., Aalto K., Endorsing sustainable food consumption: prospects from public catering, Journal of Consumer Policy, 35, 1, pp. 7-21, (2012); Weber C.L., Matthews H.S., Food-Miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States, Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 10, pp. 3508-3513, (2008); Wernet G., Bauer C., Steubing B., Reinhard J., Moreno-Ruiz E., Weidema B., The eco invent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, 9, pp. 1218-1230, (2016); Almas R., Bjorkhaug H., Rivera-Ferre M.G., Agriculture and climate change: Introduction, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 18, 3, pp. 162-166, (2011); Fox J., Scott M., Making sustainability sustainable, EPRI Journal, 3, pp. 29-30, (2015); Jang Y.J., Environmental sustainability management in the foodservice industry: understanding the antecedents and consequences, Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 19, 5, pp. 441-453, (2016); Kim S., Yoon J., Shin J., Sustainable business-and-industry foodservice, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27, 4, pp. 648-669, (2015); Mawson E., Fearne A., Purchasing strategies and decision-making processes in the food service industry: a case study of UK restaurant chains, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 1, 3, pp. 34-41, (1996); Orme J., Dooris M., Integrating health and sustainability: the higher education sector as a timely catalyst, Health Education Research, 25, 3, pp. 425-437, (2010)

Nơi xuất bản

Emerald Publishing

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus