CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Cynicism or Apathy?: Defining Political Norms Influencing the Campus Climate

Tác giả

Curtis S.M.S.; Bacha G.M.; Morgan D.L.

Năm xuất bản

2019

Source title

Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice

Số trích dẫn

2

DOI

10.1080/19496591.2019.1648276

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074010716&doi=10.1080%2f19496591.2019.1648276&partnerID=40&md5=0e0b9f9842917d15fc2050c8abca8cd6

Tóm tắt

This study focuses on the role of interpersonal experiences within students’ political identity development. Based on interviews with 22 undergraduate student leaders from two small liberal arts colleges in different regions of the country, the study reveals the role of the interpersonal dimensions of campus climate on students’ willingness or ability to be politically engaged. The article concludes with recommendations on how educators can work to understand campus political norms. © 2019, © NASPA 2019.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Beaumont E., Promoting political agency, addressing political inequality: A multilevel model of internal political efficacy, The Journal of Politics, 73, 1, pp. 216-231, (2011); Biezen I.V., Poguntke T., The decline of membership-based politics, Party Politics, 20, 2, pp. 205-216, (2014); Binder A.J., Wood K., Becoming right: How campuses shape young conservatives, (2013); Borre O., Katz D., Party identification and its motivational base in a multiparty System: A study of the Danish general election of 1971, Scandinavian Political Studies, 8, A8, pp. 69-111, (1973); Bowman N.A., Park J.J., Interracial contact on college campuses: Comparing and contrasting predictors of cross-racial interaction and interracial friendship, The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 5, pp. 660-690, (2014); Campbell D.E., Why we vote: How schools and communities shape our civic life, (2010); Campbell E.Q., The internalization of moral norms, Sociometry, 27, 4, (1964); Charmaz K., Holstein J.A., Gubrium J.F., Constructionism and the grounded theory method, Handbook of constructionist research, pp. 397-412, (2008); Charmaz K., Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, (2014); D'Souza D., Illiberal education: The politics of race and sex on campus, (1991); Dalton R.J., Cognitive mobilization and partisan dealignment in advanced industrial democracies, The Journal of Politics, 46, 1, pp. 264-284, (1984); Dalton R.J., The apartisan American, (2013); Dalton R.J., Flanagan S., Beck P., Alt J., Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies: Realignment or dealignment?, (1984); Dalton R.J., Wattenberg M., Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies, (2000); Davis I.I.I.C.H.F., Student activism, resource mobilization, and new tactical repertoires in the ‘digital age, Student Activism, Politics, and Campus Climate in Higher Education, pp. 112-124, (2019); Deth J.V., Abendschon S., Vollmar M., Children and politics: An empirical reassessment of early political socialization, Political Psychology, 32, 1, pp. 147-174, (2011); Dewey J., Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education, (1916); Dodson K., Gross N., Simmons S., The effect of college on social and political attitudes and civic participation, Professors and their politics, pp. 135-157, (2014); Doyle W.R., Skinner B.T., Does postsecondary education result in civic benefits?, The Journal of Higher Education, 88, 6, pp. 863-893, (2017); Emmanuel G., Delaney H., Professors’ influence on students’ beliefs, values, and attitudes in the classroom, Journal of College and Character, 15, 4, pp. 245-258, (2014); Evans B.J., Marsicano C.R., Lennartz C.J., Cracks in the bedrock of American democracy: Differences in civic engagement across institutions of higher education, Educational Researcher, 48, 1, pp. 31-44, (2019); Gale T., Parker S., Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 39, 5, pp. 734-753, (2014); Gidycz C.A., Orchowski L.M., Berkowitz A.D., Preventing sexual aggression among college men: An evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program, Violence against Women, 17, 6, pp. 720-742, (2011); Gimpel J.G., Lay J.C., Schuknecht J.E., Cultivating democracy: Civic environments and political socialization in America, (2003); Gowen G.H., Hemer K.M., Reason R.D., Morgan D.L., Davis C.H.F., “We are right, they are wrong. They are winning, we are losing.” Understanding American conservatism and its role in higher education, Student activism, politics, and campus climate in higher education, pp. 43-59, (2019); Gross N., Why are professors liberal and why do conservatives care?, (2013); Gross N., Simmons S., Professors and their politics, (2014); Gutmann A., Democratic education, (1999); Henning G.W., Roberts D., Student affairs assessment: Theory to practice, (2016); Hevel M.S., Martin G.L., Weeden D.D., Pascarella E.T., The effects of fraternity and sorority membership in the fourth year of college: A detrimental or value-added component of undergraduate education?, Journal of College Student Development, 56, 5, pp. 456-470, (2015); Hoffman D., Domagal-Goldman J., King S., Robinson V., Higher education’s role in enacting a thriving democracy: Civic learning and democratic engagement theory of change, (2018); Huddy L., From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory, Political Psychology, 22, 1, pp. 127-156, (2001); Hurtado S., Alvarez C.L., Guillermo-Wann C., Cuellar M., Arellano L., Smart J.C., Paulsen M.B., A model for diverse learning environments: The scholarship on creating and assessing conditions for student success, Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 27, pp. 41-122, (2012); Inkelas K.K., Daver Z.E., Vogt K.E., Leonard J.B., Living–learning programs and first-generation college students’ academic and social transition to college, Research in Higher Education, 48, 4, pp. 403-434, (2006); Johnson M.R., Developing college students’ civic identity: The role of social perspective taking and sociocultural issues discussions, Journal of College Student Development, 56, 7, pp. 687-704, (2015); Johnson M.R., Ferguson M., The role of political engagement in college students’ civic identity: Longitudinal findings from recent graduates, Journal of College Student Development, 59, 5, pp. 511-527, (2018); Kuh G.D., Kinzie J., Schuh J.H., Whitt E.J., Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter, (2010); LaBrie J.W., Hummer J.F., Neighbors C., Larimer M.E., Whose opinion matters? The relationship between injunctive norms and alcohol consequences in college students, Addictive Behaviors, 35, 4, pp. 343-349, (2010); Levine P., We are the ones we have been waiting for: The promise of civic renewal in America, (2013); Mayhew M.J., Bowman N., Rockenbach A., Seifert T., Wolniak G., Pascarella E., Terenzini P., How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works, (2016); Morgan D.L., Revealing the role of higher education in a diverse democracy: A theory of college student political identity development, (2016); Morgan D.L., Morgan D.L., Davis C.H.F., Making a “political contribution” to campus climate: Returning to a political pedagogy on college campuses, Student activism, politics, and campus climate in higher education, pp. 201-218, (2019); Morgan D.L., Davis C.H.F., Student activism, politics, and campus climate in higher education, (2019); Morgan D.L., Orphan C.M., Student political engagement in the co-curriculum: Understanding the role of senior student affairs officers, EJournal of Public Affairs, 5, 2, pp. 11-40, (2016); Morgan D.L., Zimmerman H.B., Terrell T.N., Marcotte B.A., “Stick with yourselves, it’s what’s normal”: The intergroup racial attitudes of senior white fraternity men, Journal of College and Character, 16, 2, pp. 103-119, (2015); Mutz D.C., Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy, (2006); Making citizens: How American universities teach civics, (2017); A crucible moment: College learning and democracy’s future, (2012); Patton Davis L., Renn K.A., Guido F.M., Quaye S.J., Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice, (2016); Peterson M.W., Spencer M.G., Understanding academic culture and climate, New Directions for Institutional Research, 1990, 68, pp. 3-18, (1990); Wide gender gap, growing educational divide in voters’ party identification, (2018); Putnam R.D., Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, (2000); Renn K.A., Patton L.D., Schuh J.H., Jones S.R., Harper S.R., Komives S.R., Campus ecology and environments, Student services: A handbook for the profession, pp. 242-256, (2011); Renn K.A., Reason R.D., College students in the United States: Characteristics, experiences, and outcomes, (2013); Rowan-Kenyon H., Soldner M.E., Inkelas K.K., The contributions of living- learning programs on developing sense of civic engagement in undergraduate students, NASPA, 44, 4, pp. 750-778, (2007); Saltmarsh J., Hartley M., “To serve a larger purpose”: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education, (2011); Sander T.H., Putnam R.D., Still bowling alone?: The post-9/11 split, Journal of Democracy, 21, 1, pp. 9-16, (2009); Sears D.O., Ichilov O., Whither political socialization research? The question of persistence, Political socialization, citizenship, education, and democracy, pp. 69-97, (1990); Shapiro B., Brainwashed: How universities indoctrinate America’s youth, (2004); Smith R.M., Stories of peoplehood: The politics and morals of group membership, (2003); National norms for entering college Freshman: Fall 1970, (1970); Stolzenberg E.B., Eagan K., Aragon M.C., Cesar-Davis N.M., Jacobo S., Couch V., Rios-Aguilar C., The American freshman: National norms fall 2017, (2019); Strange C.C., Banning J.H., Designing for learning, (2015); Thomas N., Morgan D.L., Davis C.H.F., Activism, free speech, and power, Student activism, politics, and campus climate in higher education, pp. 21-39, (2019); Thomas N., Brower M., Politics 365: Fostering campus climates for student political learning & engagement, (2017); Tracy S.J., Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research, Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 10, pp. 837-851, (2010); Verduzco Reyes D., Inhabiting Latino politics: How colleges shape students’ political styles, Sociology of Education, 88, 4, pp. 302-319, (2015); Weerts D.J., Cabrera A.F., Mejias P.P., Uncovering categories of civically engaged college students: A latent class analysis, The Review of Higher Education, 37, 2, pp. 141-168, (2014); Westheimer J., Kahne J., What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy, American Educational Research Journal, 41, 2, pp. 237-269, (2004); Wicks R.H., Wicks J.L., Morimoto S.A., Maxwell A., Schulte S.R., Correlates of political and civic engagement among youth during the 2012 presidential campaign, American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 5, pp. 622-644, (2013)

Nơi xuất bản

Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus