CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Freedom of speech or freedom to silence?: how color-evasive racism protects the intimidation tactics of American extreme rightwing organizations
Tác giả
Rodriguez J.
Năm xuất bản
2020
Source title
Race Ethnicity and Education
Số trích dẫn
4
DOI
10.1080/13613324.2020.1798385
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Extreme Rightwing Organizations (EROs) routinely use media outlets to harass professors and students. Simultaneously, EROs fund speakers and campus organizations that have a history of intimidating members of academic communities. Debates about how and whether to respond to ERO tactics that are framed in terms of balancing ‘freedom of speech’ against ‘inclusion’ engage in a variety of color-evasive racism that sustains white supremacist ideology and protects white privilege. This framing legitimizes tactics that empower EROs with the right to silence their critics and foster a climate of oppression. Through an autoethnographic case study of struggles at a small liberal arts college with how to respond to ERO tactics, this article argues that rejecting the ‘freedom of speech’ versus ‘inclusion’ framing that so often characterizes the debates can help us to move beyond the paralysis that EROs have manufactured and rally against their tactics of intimidation and harassment. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Từ khóa
abstract liberalism; color-evasiveness; Freedom of speech; harassment; higher education
Tài liệu tham khảo
Targeted Online Harassment of Faculty, (2017); Stand against Targeted Threats and Harassment, (2017); Andrew J.A., The Other Side of the Sixties: Young Americans for Freedom and the Rise of Conservative Politics, (1997); Annamma S.A., Jackson D.D., Morrison D., Conceptualizing Color-Evasiveness: Using Dis/ability Critical Race Theory to Expand a Color-blind Ideology in Education and Society, Race Ethnicity and Education, 20, 2, pp. 147-162, (2017); Applebaum B., Being White, Being Good: White Complicity, White Moral Responsibility, and Social Justice Pedagogy, (2010); Binder A.J., Wood K., Becoming Right: How Campuses Shape Young Conservatives, (2013); Bonilla-Silva E., Racial Attitudes or Racial Ideology? An Alternative Paradigm for Examining Actors’ Racial Views, Journal of Political Ideologies, 8, 1, pp. 63-82, (2003); Bonilla-Silva E., Racism without Racists. Colorblind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America, 3rd Edition, (2009); Butler J., Limits on Free Speech?, (2017); New FBI Data Shows Rise in anti-Semitic Hate Crimes, (2017); Chemerinsky E., Gillman H., Free Speech on Campus, (2017); Covaleskie J.F., Speech, Academic Freedom, and Privilege, Journal of Academic Freedom, (2019); Crenshaw K., Race, Reform, Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination Law, Harvard Law Review, 101, 7, pp. 1331-1387, (1988); Crenshaw K., Gotanda N., Peller G., Thomas K., Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement, (1995); Delgado R., Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others: A Plea for Narrative, Michigan Law Review, 87, pp. 2411-2441, (1989); Delgado R., Stefancic J., Must We Defend Nazis? Why the First Amendment Should Not Protect Hate Speech and White Supremacy, (2018); Dixson A.D., Rousseau C.K., And We are Still Not Saved: Critical Race Theory in Education Ten Years Later, Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 1, pp. 7-27, (2005); Dutt-Ballerstadt R., When Free Speech Disrupts Diversity Initiatives: What We Value and What We Do Not, Journal of Academic Freedom, (2018); Echols K., Morales-Flores J., Diversity Work: Testing the Waters of Academic Freedom and the Cultural Climate on Campus, Journal of Academic Freedom, (2018); Ellison J., Dear Class of 2020 Student, (2016); Ferber A.L., ‘Are You Willing to Die for This Work?’ Public Targeted Online Harassment in Higher Education, Gender & Society, 31, 3, pp. 301-310, (2018); Finley S.C., Gray B.M., Martin L.L., ‘Affirming Our Values’: African American Scholars, White Virtual Mobs, and the Complicity of White University Administrators, Journal of Academic Freedom, (2018); Gotanda N., A Critique of ‘Our Constitution Is Colorblind.’, Stanford Law Review, 44, pp. 1-68, (1991); Harris C., Whiteness as Property, Harvard Law Review, 106, 8, pp. 1707-1791, (1993); Hollis L.P., The Ironic Interplay of Free Speech and Silencing: Does Workplace Bullying Compromise Free Speech in Higher Education?, Journal of Academic Freedom, (2018); Holyfield L., Molz M.R., Bradley M.S., Race Discourse and the US Confederate Flag, Race Ethnicity and Education, 12, 4, pp. 517-537, (2009); Kamola I., Dear Administrators: To Protect Your Faculty from Right-Wing Attacks, Follow the Money, Journal of Academic Freedom, (2019); Klatch R.E., A Generation Divided: The New Left, the New Right, and the 1960s, (1999); Lawrence C., The Word and the River: Pedagogy as Scholarship as Struggle, Critical Race Theory: The Key Writing that Formed the Movement, pp. 336-351, (1995); Ledesma M.C., Calderon D., Critical Race Theory in Education: A Review of past Literature and A Look to the Future, Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 3, pp. 206-222, (2015); Leonardo Z., Race, Whiteness, and Education, (2009); Marantz A., Free Speech Is Killing Us, (2019); Martinez M.A., Chang A., Welton A.D., Assistant Professors of Color Confront the Inequitable Terrain of Academia: A Community Cultural Wealth Perspective, Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 20, 5, pp. 696-710, (2017); Mayer J., Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires behind the Rise of the Radical Right, (2016); Messer-Davidow E., Manufacturing the Attack on Liberalized Higher Education, Social Text, 36, pp. 40-80, (1993); Munson Z., Mobilizing on Campus: Conservative Movements and Today’s College Students, Sociological Forum, 25, 4, pp. 786-796, (2010); Rodriguez J., Rodriguez N., Freeman K., Student Evaluations of Teaching: Phrenology in the 21st Century?, Race Ethnicity and Education, 23, 4, pp. 473-491, (2019); Rousseau C., Tate W., No Time like the Present: Reflecting on Equity in School Mathematics, Theory into Practice, 42, 3, pp. 210-216, (2003); Schmidt P., Higher Education’s Internet Outrage Machine, The Chronicle of Higher Education, (2015); Scott J., On Free Speech and Academic Freedom, Journal of Academic Freedom, (2017); Scott J., How the Right Weaponized Free Speech, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2018); Siegel D., Why Fascist Speech Is Not Free Speech, Counterpunch, (2017); Taylor K., The Free Speech Hypocrisy of Right-Wing Media, (2017); Report of the Committee on Freedom of Expression, (2014); Weida J., Free Speech, Safe Spaces, and Teaching in the Current US Political Climate, Journal of Academic Freedom, (2018); Williams J.E., Academic Freedom Double Standard: ‘Freedom’ for Courtiers, Suppression for Critical Scholars, Journal of Academic Freedom, (2018); Wilson J.K., The Myth of Political Correctness, (1995)
Nơi xuất bản
Routledge
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus