CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
A questionnaire survey on the sense of educational and social equities among college students in China
Tác giả
Wang X.; Wang J.; Li Z.
Năm xuất bản
2020
Source title
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning
Số trích dẫn
2
DOI
10.3991/ijet.v15i14.15357
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
The sense of equity reflects how fair a domain is as evaluated by those engaging in that domain. It is very meaningful to explore the sense of equity among college students, which are a special group of people. This study carried out a questionnaire survey on the sense of equity among 982 college students in China, from the perspectives of educational equity and social equity. The questions were validated by the 27/73 quantile method, and the survey results were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA). The results showed that the college students could evaluate the sense of equity rather accurately and generally had a higher sense of equity, but failed to sense the social outcome equity well; their sense of social equity was lower than the sense of educational equity; the sense of equity varied between college students in different majors: the science majors had a lower sense of equity than those majoring in liberal arts; some college students had a misunderstanding of equity. © Kassel University Press GmbH.
Từ khóa
College students; Educational equity; Sense of equity; Social equity
Tài liệu tham khảo
Collins B.J., Mossholder K.W., Taylor S.G., Does process fairness affect job performance? It only matters if they plan to stay, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 7, pp. 1007-1026, (2012); Poon J.M.L., Distributive justice, procedural justice, affective commitment, and turnover intention: A mediation-moderation framework, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 6, pp. 1505-1532, (2012); Yeol J.S., Effects of organizational trust by employees in franchised Korean restaurants on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior, International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 30, 9, pp. 191-205, (2016); Moon K.K., Fairness at the organizational level: examining the effect of organizational justice climate on collective turnover rates and organizational performance, Public Personnel Management, 46, 2, pp. 118-143, (2017); Herr R.M., Almer C., Bosle C., Fischer J.E., Associations of changes in Organizational justice with job attitudes and health-findings from a prospective study using a matching-based difference-in-difference approach, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 1, pp. 119-135, (2020); Nazir S., Shafi A., Atif M.M., Qun W., Abdullah S.M., How organization justice and perceived organizational support facilitate employees' innovative behavior at work, Employee Relations, 41, 6, pp. 1288-1311, (2019); Blouch R., Azeem M.F., Effects of perceived diversity on perceived organizational performance Mediating role of perceived organizational justice, Employee Relations, 41, 5, pp. 1079-1097, (2019); Sahoo R., Sahoo C.K., Organizational justice, conflict management and employee relations the mediating role of climate of trust, International Journal of Manpower, 40, 4, pp. 783-799; Shoaib S., Baruch Y., Deviant behavior in a moderated-mediation framework of incentives, organizational justice perception, and reward expectancy, Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 3, pp. 617-633, (2019); Visschers V.H.M., Siegrist M., Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants, Energy Policy, 46, pp. 292-300, (2012); Van Craen M., Skogan W.G., Achieving Fairness in Policing: The link between internal and external procedural justice, Police Quarterly, 20, 1, pp. 3-23, (2017); Whitton J., Brasier K., Charnley-Parry I., Cotton M., Shale gas governance in the United Kingdom and the United States: Opportunities for public participation and the implications for social justice, Energy Research & Social Science, 26, pp. 11-22, (2017); Magalhaes P.C., Aguiar-Conraria L., Procedural fairness, the economy, and support for political authorities, Political Psychology, 40, 1, pp. 165-181; Esaiasson P., Persson M., Gilljam M., Lindholm T., Reconsidering the Role of Procedures for Decision Acceptance, British Journal of Political Science, 49, 1, pp. 291-314, (2019); Niesiobedzka M., Kolodziej S., The fair process effect in taxation: the roles of procedural fairness, outcome favorability and outcome fairness in the acceptance of tax authority decisions, Current Psychology, 39, 1, pp. 246-253; Geraci A., Surian L., The developmental roots of fairness: infants' reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources, Developmental Science, 14, 5, pp. 1012-1020, (2011); Sloane S., Baillargeon R., Premack D., Do Infants have a sense of fairness, Psychological Science, 23, 2, pp. 196-204, (2012); Robbins J.M., Ford M.T., Tetrick L.E., Perceived unfairness and employee health: a meta-analytic integration, Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 2, pp. 235-272, (2012); Shaw A., Montinari N., Piovesan M., Olson K.R., Gino F., Norton M.I., Children Develop a Veil of Fairness, Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 143, 1, pp. 363-375, (2014); Maier C.A., Priest J.B., Perceived Fairness, Marital Conflict, and Depression: A Dyadic Data Analysis, American Journal of Family Therapy, 44, 2, pp. 95-109, (2016); Starmans C., Sheskin M., Bloom P., Why people prefer unequal societies, Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 4, (2017); McAuliffe K., Blake P.R., Warneken F., Costly fairness in children is influenced by who is watching, Developmental Psychology, 56, 4, pp. 773-782, (2020)
Nơi xuất bản
Kassel University Press GmbH
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus