CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Using Design Thinking and Technological Domains to Assess Knowledge Transfer in Engineering Design

Tác giả

Krupczak J.J.; Mina M.; Rands M.

Năm xuất bản

2019

Source title

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

Số trích dẫn

3

DOI

10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028630

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85082468566&doi=10.1109%2fFIE43999.2019.9028630&partnerID=40&md5=a09504ff7b904bc21532bf5d27572bd9

Tóm tắt

This innovative practice work-in-progress paper examines the application of design thinking in engineering literacy courses and argues that, for engineering and technological literacy applications, design thinking exercises benefit from situating design activities within technological domains. This approach also facilitates assessment of the student design abilities. Design thinking is a well-known process for problem solving. However, when used in engineering literacy courses for non-engineering majors, the outcomes of the ideation stage are severely constrained by the student's internal technological knowledge base. Student design thinking exercises can result in technologically vague concepts. Liberal arts students from non-technical disciplines become frustrated and see the design process as suspect and fail to embrace a multidimensional perspective on design. Non-engineering students lack critical engineering science knowledge relevant to the problem but the nature of engineering literacy courses for non-engineers precludes in-depth mathematics-based engineering science prerequisites. We have found that the platform of technological domains effective in supporting students between the innovation of design thinking and the empowerment of engineering science. Technological systems form clusters or domains of related systems around a set of shared components based on similar underlying physical principles, for example, vapor-compression refrigeration systems. We have found that students benefit if design exercises are conducted in the context of a technological domain. In the work reported here, students studied the familiar domestic refrigerator as typifying the technology enabled by the engineering science underlying the vapor-compression cycle. Students were then presented with a design challenge involving a cooling application but different from the function of a domestic kitchen refrigerator. Non-engineering students were able to develop potentially feasible system design concepts at the component level that were novel to them. This approach made it possible to assess knowledge transfer and design ability of liberal arts students in a general education engineering literacy course. © 2019 IEEE.

Từ khóa

design assessment; design thinking; engineering design; general education; liberal arts engineering

Tài liệu tham khảo

Pearson G., Young A.T., Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More about Technology, (2002); NSF 18045 Building the Future: Investing in Discovery and Innovation-NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2018-2022, (2019); Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy, (2006); Cross N., Designerly ways of knowing, Design Studies, Special Issue Design Education, 3, 4, pp. 221-227, (1982); Buchanan R., Wicked problems in design thinking, Design Issues, 8, 2, pp. 5-21, (1992); Brown T., Design Thinking, (2008); Brown T., Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, (2009); Lockwood T., Design Thinking: Integrating Innovation, Customer Experience, and Brand Value, (2009); Dorst K., The core of 'design thinking' and its application, Design Studies, Interpreting Design Thinking, 32, 6, pp. 521-532, (2011); Design Thinking Resources; Baish J.W., Rich T.P., Design as a liberal art, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, (2001); Flath D., Michelfelder D.P., Thinking like an engineer: Responding to the engineering blind spot at liberal arts colleges, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; Krupczak J., Mina M., Work in progress: An approach to engineering literacy emphasizing components, Functions, and Systems Paper 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (2015); Krupczak J., Workshop: Engineering Reasoning-An Approach to Increasing the Appeal of Introductory Engineering Courses to All Students Paper at 2018 FYEE Conference, (2018); American Society for Engineering Education, Engineering Enhanced Liberal Education; Arthur B., The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves, Simon and Schuster, (2009)

Nơi xuất bản

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

Hình thức xuất bản

Conference paper

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus