CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
A Comparison of Peer Rating Behavior between Students in Hard vs. Soft Disciplines
Tác giả
Benner M.; Ferguson D.; Beigpourian B.; Ohland M.
Năm xuất bản
2019
Source title
Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028576
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This Work in Progress research focuses on the peer ratings behavior of students in liberal arts and business, versus engineering or the sciences and is relevant wherever teams are used as part of the pedagogy, We examine whether there are differences in patterns of peer rating behavior due to differences in their particular learning experiences and learning style preferences, as measured by their patterns in evaluations in peer ratings surveys. Our hypothesis is that engineering students ('hard discipline students') will have significant differences in the patterns of peer evaluation scores as opposed to liberal arts or business students ('soft discipline students'). This analysis will use convergence in self and peer ratings, dispersion in ratings across peer evaluation dimensions, and the variances examined in the Social Relations Model as statistical analysis methods.The goals of this research are to discover if peer ratings patterns are significantly influenced by learning styles or learning preferences. And, if peer ratings behavior is influenced by learning styles or preferences then we plan to aid instructors in managing learning for doing/receiving peer ratings and improving teamwork behavior for students taking their courses based on their students' differences in learning styles/preferences. Our preliminary findings confirm our hypothesis that such peer ratings behavior differences exist. © 2019 IEEE.
Từ khóa
'; 'Hard' Discipline; 'Soft' Discipline; Discipline, '; Discipline, Peer Ratings; Hard'; Peer Ratings; Soft'
Tài liệu tham khảo
Biglan A., Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments, Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 3, pp. 204-213, (1973); Kolb D., Learning styles and disciplinary differences, Modern American College, pp. 232-253, (1981); Lindblom-Ylanne S., Trigwell K., Nevgi A., Ashwin P., How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context, Studies in Higher Education, 31, 3, pp. 285-298, (2006); Parpala A., LindblomYlanne S., Komulainen E., Litmanen T., Hirsto L., Students' approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 2, pp. 269-282, (2010); Kemp S.J., Exploring the use of learner-focused teaching approaches in different academic disciplines, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37, 6, pp. 804-818, (2013); Hill F., Tomkinson B., Hiley A., Dobson H., Learning style preferences: An examination of differences amongst students with different disciplinary backgrounds, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53, 2, pp. 122-134, (2014); Hativa N., Birenbaum M., Who prefers what disciplinary differences in students' preferred approaches to teaching and learning styles, Research in Higher Education, 41, 2, pp. 209-236, (2000); Ohland M.W., Et al., The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self and peer evaluation, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 4, pp. 609-630, (2012); Loughry M., Ohland M., Moore D., Development of a theory-based assessment of team member effectiveness, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 3, pp. 505-524, (2007); Loughry M.L., Ohland M.W., Woehr D.J., Assessing teamwork skills for assurance of learning using catme team tools, Journal of Marketing Education, 36, 1, pp. 5-19, (2014); Ohland M.W., Et al., Effects of behavioral anchors on peer evaluation reliability, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, pp. 319-326, (2005); Cohen J., Statistical Power Analyses for the Social Sciences, (1988); Back M.D., Kenny D.A., The social relations model: How to understand dyadic processes, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 10, pp. 855-870, (2010); Greguras G.J., Robie C., Born M.P., Applying the social relations model to self and peer evaluations, Journal of Management Development, 20, 6, pp. 508-525, (2001); Comte A., Harrison F., Martineau H., The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, (1896)
Nơi xuất bản
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Hình thức xuất bản
Conference paper
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus