CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Faculty Motivation in Service-Learning Based on Expectancy x Value Theory
Tác giả
Darby A.; Willingham L.
Năm xuất bản
2022
Source title
Journal of Experiential Education
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1177/10538259211058292
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Background: Research has established that service-learning is a high-impact practice with significant consequences for student learning. Research in this area can provide greater understanding and recognition of the value faculty bring to the service-learning experience. Purpose: Examining faculty members’ memorable experiences in service-learning pedagogy through the Expectancy x Value theory of motivation will help colleges and universities more effectively support and retain faculty who teach service-learning courses. Methodology/Approach: Twenty-two faculty from a medium-sized liberal arts institution each participated in a 24-min interview and described memorable service-learning experiences with students. Inductive analysis and the Expectancy x Value theory of motivation were used to analyze the data. Findings/Conclusions: The study found that faculty members highlighted themes of faculty fostering student and community connections, valuing the service-learning work, and assisting students in learning from their discomfort during service-learning experiences. Faculty's expectations of success centered on their own self-efficacy and view of ability. Faculty valued the relationships that were established, benefits that were gained, and risks that were taken. Implications: Through the Expectancy x Value theory, this research provides a foundation for understanding what motivates faculty to continue teaching service-learning courses, which can help institutions more effectively support faculty members. © The Authors 2022.
Từ khóa
expectancy x value theory; faculty motivation; service-learning in higher education
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abes E., Jackson G., Jones S., Factors that motivate and deter faculty use of service-learning, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9, 1, pp. 5-17, (2002); Atkinson J.W., An introduction to motivation, (1964); Banerjee M., Hausafus C.O., Faculty use of service-learning: Perceptions, motivations, and impediments for the human sciences, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14, 1, pp. 32-45, (2007); Bexley E., Arkoudis S., James R., Motivations, values and future plans of Australian academics, Higher Education, 65, pp. 385-400, (2013); Boeije H.B., Analysis in qualitative research, (2010); Bringle R.G., Hybrid high-impact pedagogies: Integrating service-learning with three other high-impact pedagogies, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 24, 1, pp. 49-63, (2017); Conley A.M., Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives, Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1, pp. 32-47, (2012); Cooper J.R., Ten years in the trenches: Faculty perspectives on sustaining service-learning, Journal of Experiential Education, 37, 4, pp. 415-428, (2014); Darby A., Newman G., Exploring faculty members’ motivation and persistence in academic service-learning pedagogy, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18, 2, pp. 91-119, (2014); Daumiller M., Dresel M., Teaching and research: Specificity and congruence of university faculty achievement goals, International Journal of Educational Research, 98, (2020); Daumiller M., Stupnisky R., Janke S., Motivation of higher education faculty: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions, International Journal of Educational Research, 99, (2020); Feldman K.A., Paulsen M.B., Faculty motivation: The role of a supportive teaching culture, New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 1999, pp. 69-78, (1999); Green S., Using an expectancy-value approach to examine teachers’ motivational strategies, Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 8, pp. 989-1005, (2002); Guillaume R.O., Kalkbrenner M.T., The utility of self-determination theory in faculty of color's Successful pursuit of tenure and promotion to the rank of associate professor, International Journal of Educational Research, 98, pp. 272-279, (2019); Hammond C., Integrating service and academic study: Faculty motivation and satisfaction in Michigan higher education, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1, 1, pp. 21-28, (1994); Hou S.-I., Wilder S., Changing pedagogy: Faculty adoption of service-learning: Motivations, barriers, and strategies among service-learning faculty at a public research institution, SAGE Open, (2015); Ismayilova K., Klassen R.M., Research and teaching self-efficacy of university faculty: Relations with job satisfaction, International Journal of Educational Research, 98, pp. 55-66, (2019); Kahneman D., Thinking, fast and slow, (2011); Knapp N., The “expectancy x value” model of motivation [unpublished document], (2003); Loh E.K.Y., What we know about expectancy-value theory, and how it helps to design a sustained motivating learning environment, System, 86, (2019); Martin A., Dowson M., Interrelationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yield for theory, current issues, and educational practice, Review of Educational Research, 79, 1, pp. 327-365, (2009); Moody J., What to know about experiential learning in college, (2019); O'Meara K., Motivation for faculty community engagement: Learning from exemplars, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12, 1, pp. 7-29, (2008); Schunk D., Pintrinch P., Meece J., Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application, (2008); Watt H.M.G., Richardson P.W., Motivation of higher education faculty: (How) it matters!, International Journal of Educational Research, 100, (2020)
Nơi xuất bản
SAGE Publications Ltd
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus