CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Teaching Creative Process across Disciplines
Tác giả
Daly S.R.; Mosyjowski E.A.; Seifert C.M.
Năm xuất bản
2019
Source title
Journal of Creative Behavior
Số trích dẫn
19
DOI
10.1002/jocb.158
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
While there is great interest in higher education about teaching creative process, there have been relatively few studies of how courses can facilitate the development of creative skills. The goal of this study was to document how college instructors structure courses intended to develop students’ creative processes. The study data included interviews from instructors and students using a critical case sample of fifteen courses at a single U.S. University. A qualitative analysis of the transcripts yielded a set of 14 pedagogical elements appearing across courses. Common elements were open-ended projects and skill-building activities, and less frequently, risk taking experiences and self-reflection. The sample included undergraduate courses in engineering, education, the liberal arts, and the arts, and the elements observed were often shared across courses from different disciplines. These findings provide a diverse set of pedagogical approaches and opportunities for building creative process skills within undergraduate courses. © 2016 by the Creative Education Foundation, Inc.
Từ khóa
cognition; creativity; education; process; research
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adams R.S., Turns J., Atman C.J., Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice, Design Studies, 24, pp. 275-294, (2003); Amabile T.M., The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, (1983); Anderson N.B., Evidence-based practice in psychology, American Psychologist, 61, pp. 271-285, (2006); Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R., Airasian P.W., Cruikshank K.A., Mayer R.E., Pintrich P.R., Raths J., Wittrock M.C., A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, (2001); Anthony K.H., Private reactions to public criticism; Students, faculty, and practicing architects state their views on design juries in architectural education, Journal of Architectural Education, 40, pp. 2-11, (1987); Anzai Y., Simon H.A., The theory of learning by doing, Psychological Review, 86, pp. 124-140, (1979); Baillie C., Walker P., Fostering creative thinking in student engineers, European Journal of Engineering Education, 23, pp. 35-44, (1998); Baloche L., Montgomery D., Bull K.S., Slayer B.K., Faculty perceptions of college creativity courses, Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, pp. 222-227, (1992); Barrows H.S., Tamblyn R., Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education, (1980); Beaty R.E., Silvia P.J., Nusbaum E.C., Jauk E., Benedek M., The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition, Memory & Cognition, 42, pp. 1186-1197, (2014); Beghetto R.A., Kaufman J.C., Broadening conceptions of creativity in the classroom, Nurturing creativity in the classroom, pp. 191-205, (2010); Blumenfeld P.C., Soloway E., Marx R.W., Krajcik J.S., Guzdial M., Palincsar A., Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning, Educational Psychologist, 26, pp. 369-398, (1991); Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., Cocking R.R., How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, (1999); Brown A.L., Metacognition, executive control, self regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms, Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, pp. 65-116, (1987); Bull S., Montgomery D., Baloche L., Teaching creativity at the college level: A synthesis of curricular components perceived as important by instructors, Creativity Research Journal, 8, pp. 83-89, (1995); Carlson L.E., Sullivan J.F., Hands-on engineering: Learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program, International Journal of Engineering Education, 15, pp. 20-31, (1999); Case J.M., Light G., Emerging research methodologies in engineering education research, Journal of Engineering Education, 100, pp. 186-210, (2011); Christiaans H., Creativity in design: The role of domain knowledge in designing, (1992); Chung J.C.C., Chow S.M.K., Promoting student learning through a student-centered problem-based learning subject curriculum, Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 41, pp. 157-168, (2004); Cloud-Hanson K.A., Kuehner J.N., Tong L., Miller S., Handelsman J., Money, sex and drugs: A case study to teach the genetics of antibiotic resistance, CBE Life Sciences Education, 7, pp. 302-309, (2008); Cole D.G., Sugioka H.L., Yamagata-Lynch L.C., Supportive classroom environments for creativity in higher education, Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, pp. 277-293, (1999); Cosh J., Peer observation: A reflective model, 53, pp. 22-27, (1999); Creswell J.W., Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, (1994); Cropley A.J., Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators, (2001); Csikszentmihalyi M., The domain of creativity, Theories of creativity, pp. 190-212, (1990); Daly S., Adams R., Bodner G., What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences, Journal of Engineering Education, 101, pp. 187-219, (2012); Daly S.R., Mosyjowski E., Seifert C.M., Teaching creativity in engineering courses, Journal of Engineering Education, 103, pp. 417-449, (2014); Dannels D.P., Martin K.N., Critiquing critiques: A genre analysis of feedback across novice to expert design studios, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, pp. 135-159, (2008); DeHaan R.L., Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science, CBE Life Sciences Education, 8, pp. 172-181, (2009); Dewulf S., Baillie C., CASE: How to foster creativity, (1999); Dochy F.J.R.C., Segers M., Sluijsmans D., The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review, Studies in Higher Education, 24, pp. 331-350, (1999); Dochy F., Segers M., Van den Bossche P., Gijbels D., Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis, Learning and Instruction, 13, pp. 533-568, (2003); Dutson A.J., Todd R.H., Magleby S.P., Sorensen C.D., A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses, Journal of Engineering Education, 86, pp. 17-28, (1997); Elliott J., Making evidence-based practice educational, British Educational Research Journal, 27, pp. 555-574, (2001); Finke R.A., Ward T.B., Smith S.M., Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications, (1992); Flyvbjerg B., Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12, pp. 219-245, (2006); Flyvbjerg B., Case study, The Sage handbook of qualitative research, pp. 301-316, (2011); Fogler H.S., LeBlanc S.E., Strategies for creative problem solving, (2013); Gibson D.E., Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, pp. 134-156, (2004); Glaser B., Strauss A., The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, (2009); de Graaff E., Kolmos A., Characteristics of problem-based learning, International Journal of Engineering Education, 19, pp. 657-662, (2003); Grant A.M., Berry J.W., The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 54, pp. 73-96, (2011); Hauer A., Daniels M., A learning theory perspective on running open-ended group projects (OEGPs), Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australasian Computing Education, 78, pp. 85-91, (2008); Helle L., Tynjala P., Olkinuora E., Project-based learning in post-secondary education–theory, practice and rubber sling shots, Higher Education, 51, pp. 287-314, (2006); Hennessey B.A., Amabile T.M., Creativity, Annual Review of Psychology, 61, pp. 569-598, (2010); Hoever I.J., Van Knippenberg D., van Ginkel W.P., Barkema H.G., Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential, Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, pp. 982-996, (2012); Horn J., Hong J., ChanLin L., Chang S., Chu H., Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, pp. 352-358, (2005); Isaksen S.G., Dorval K.B., Treffinger D.J., Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for innovation and change, (2010); Ishii N., Suzuki Y., Fujiyoshi H., Fujii T., Kozawa M., A framework for designing learning environments fostering creativity, Current developments in technology-assisted education, pp. 228-232, (2006); Jablokow K., A course in creativity, innovation and change, The thinking expedition, (2001); Kazerounian K., Foley S., Barriers to creativity in engineering education: A study of instructors and students perceptions, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, pp. 761-768, (2007); Kelley T., The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America's leading design firm, (2007); Kind P.M., Kind V., Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science, Studies in Science Education, 43, pp. 1-37, (2007); Kirton M.J., Adaption-innovation: In the context of diversity and change, (2004); Kolb D.A., Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, 1, (1984); Lattuca L.R., Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty, (2001); Lattuca L.R., Voigt L.J., Fath K.Q., Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions, The Review of Higher Education, 28, pp. 23-48, (2004); Linsey J., Markman A., Wood K., Design by analogy: A study of the WordTree Method for problem re-representation, Journal of Mechanical Design, 13, (2012); Malterud K., Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines, Lancet, 358, pp. 483-488, (2001); Marquis E., Vajoczki S., Creative differences: Teaching creativity across the disciplines, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6, (2012); Mills J.E., Treagust D.F., Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3, pp. 2-16, (2003); Mumford M.D., Mobley M.I., Uhlman C.E., Reiter-Palmon R., Doares L., Process analytic models of creative capacities, Creativity Research Journal, 4, pp. 91-122, (1991); Nelson H., Stolterman E., The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world, (2012); Nicol D.J., Macfarlane-Dick D., Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher Education, 31, pp. 199-218, (2006); Oh Y., Ishizaki S., Gross M.D., Do E., A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios, Design Studies, 34, pp. 302-325, (2013); Patton M., Qualitative evaluation and research methods, (1990); Prince M., Does active learning work? A review of the research, Journal of Engineering Education, 93, pp. 223-232, (2004); Prince M.J., Felder R.M., Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases, Journal of Engineering Education, 95, pp. 123-138, (2006); Reynolds C., Stevens D.D., West E., “I'm in a professional school! Why are you making me do this?” A cross-disciplinary study of the use of creative classroom projects on student learning, College Teaching, 61, pp. 51-59, (2013); Runco M.A., Everyone has creative potential, Creativity: From potential to realization, pp. 21-30, (2004); Sanders E.B.N., Scaffolds for building everyday creativity, Design for effective communications: Creating contexts for clarity and meaning, pp. 65-77, (2006); Schon D.A., The design process, Varieties of thinking: Essays from Harvard's philosophy of education research center, pp. 111-141, (1990); Schon D.A., The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, (1993); Scott G., Leritz L.E., Mumford M.D., The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review, Creativity Research Journal, 16, pp. 361-388, (2004); Seng T.O., Thinking skills, creativity, and problem-based learning, 2nd Asia Pacific Conference on Problem-Based Learning, (2000); Sessa V.I., Using perspective taking to manage conflict and affect in teams, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, pp. 101-115, (1996); Simonton D.K., Creativity: Cognitive, personal developmental, and social aspects, American Psychologist, 55, pp. 151-158, (2000); Somervell H., Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self-peer and collaborative assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, pp. 221-233, (1993); Speizer J.J., Role models, mentors, and sponsors: The elusive concepts, Signs, 6, pp. 692-712, (1981); Spelt E.J., Biemans H.J., Tobi H., Luning P.A., Mulder M., Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: A systematic review, Educational Psychology Review, 21, pp. 365-378, (2009); Sternberg R.J., Lubart T., Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity, (1995); Sternberg R.J., Williams W.M., How to develop student creativity, (1996); Stouffer W.B., Russel J., Oliva M.G., Making the strange familiar: Creativity and the future of engineering education, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,, (2004); Thousand J.S., Villa R.A., Nevin A., Creativity and collaborative learning: The practical guide to empowering students and teachers, (1994); Topping K., Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, pp. 249-276, (1998); Torrance E.P., Guiding creative talent, (1962); Torrance E.P., Teaching for creativity, Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, pp. 114-143, (1972); Torrance E.P., Myers R.E., Creative learning and teaching, (1973); Treffinger D., Young G., Shelby E., Shepardson C., Assessing creativity: A guide for educators, (2002); Van den Berg I., Admiraal W., Pilot A., Designing student peer assessment in higher education: Analysis of written and oral peer feedback, Teaching in Higher Education, 11, pp. 135-147, (2006); Verhaegen P.A., D'Hondt J., Vandevenne D., Dewulf S., Duflou J.R., Identifying candidates for design-by-analogy, Computers in Industry, 62, pp. 446-459, (2011); Vernon D., Blake R., Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research, Academic Medicine, 68, pp. 550-563, (1993); Watts M., Science and poetry: Passion v. prescription in school science?, International Journal of Science Education, 23, pp. 197-208, (2001); Wilde D.J., Changes among ASEE creativity workshop participants, Journal of Engineering Education, 82, pp. 167-170, (1993); Wilkin M., Reviewing the review: An account of a research investigation of “the crit”, Changing architectural education: Towards a new professionalism, pp. 100-107, (2005); Wince-Smith D.L., The creativity imperative: A national perspective, Peer Review, 8, (2006)
Nơi xuất bản
Creative Education Foudation
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus