CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Cognitive Acceleration Program in Undergraduate School
Tác giả
Shoji Y.
Năm xuất bản
2019
Source title
Proceedings - 2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2019
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.00090
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
An education program to help students increase their cognitive level in undergraduate school would set the base for their education at graduate school. We see two different stages in the early stage of 'logical thinking' and identified them using some assessments. Students at the first stage are just using the correct equations in the textbook. However, the logic of students at the second stage is reasoning of the correct law, which is important for practical use. Instructors should check what stage of logic their students use in order to prepare them for higher education at graduate school. © 2019 IEEE.
Từ khóa
CASE; cognitive stage; CTSR; FCI; graduate school; Institutional Research; liberal arts; logical thinking; Piagetian development psychology; under graduate school
Tài liệu tham khảo
The Ideal State of Graduate Education with A View to 2040-Measures to Improve the Organization for Developing Human Resources to Lead Society, (2019); Trends and Forecasts of the Number of College Admissions, (2018); Basic Data Showing the Current State of Graduate School, (2017); Mission of the University, (1946); Hestenes D., Wells M., Swackhamer G., Force concept inventory, Phys. Teach, 30, (1992); Bao L., Cai T., Koenig K., Fang K., Han J., Wang J., Liu Q., Ding L., Cui L., Luo Y., Wang Y., Li L., Wu N., Learning and scientific reasoning, Science, 323, pp. 586-587, (2009); Lawson A.E., The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning, J. Res. Sci. Teach, 15, 1, pp. 11-24, (1978); Shoji Y., Demand survey of stem classes as liberal arts subjects, IEEE Proceedings of 2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), pp. 181-184, (2018); Adey P., Shayer M., Yates C., Thinking Science: Professional Edition, (2003); McDermott L.C., Shaffer P.S., Tutorials in Introductory Physics, (2002); Hake R.R., Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A sixthousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, Am. J. Phys, 66, (1998); Lasry N., Rosenfield S., Dedic H., Dahan A., Reshef O., The puzzling reliability of the force concept inventory, Am. J. Phys, 79, 9, pp. 909-912, (2011); Redish E.F., Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite, (2003); Gray K., Rebello S., Zollman D., The effect of question order on responses to multiple-choice questions, Physics Education Research Conference 2002, Part of the per Conference Series, (2002); Wilson K.F., Low D.J., On second thoughts?: Changes of mind as an indication of competing knowledge structures, Am. J. Phys, 83, (2015); Higuchi K., English Home Page of KH Coder; Hammer D., Student resources for learning introductory physics, Am. J. Phys, 68, (2000); Adams W., Perkins K., Podolefsky N., Dubson M., Finkelstein N., Wieman C., New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado learning attitudes about science survey, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res, 2, (2006); Bandura A., Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, (1977)
Nơi xuất bản
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Hình thức xuất bản
Conference paper
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus