CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
#Dhsiyearmodels: Models for DH at liberal arts colleges and four-year institutions
Tác giả
Simons J.; Nieves A.D.
Năm xuất bản
2019
Source title
Doing More Digital Humanities: Open Approaches to Creation, Growth, and Development
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.4324/9780429353048-21
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This chapter attempts to serve as a practical guide. It begins with an overview of the challenges of integrating digital humanities (DH) at undergraduate institutions. The Digital Humanities Initiative (DHi) at Hamilton College serves as a case study and a reference for comparison to other undergraduate DH models. Models for DH at liberal arts colleges and four-year institutions are challenged to integrate undergraduate students into DH research and to integrate DH research and methods into courses. Developing the DHi at Hamilton College will be used as a case study with examples and explanations of options and decisions made in developing a DH initiative at a liberal arts college. As a liberal arts college, collaborative research between faculty and students is the primary mission of DHi at Hamilton. The value of metadata was one of the early lessons learned in developing frameworks for staff collaborations. Undergraduate humanities research students typically begin by reading everything their research professor has written. © 2020 selection and editorial matter, Constance Crompton, Richard J. Lane, and Ray Siemens.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander B., Davis R.F., Should Liberal Arts Campuses Do Digital Humanities? Process and Products in the Small College World, Debates in the Digital Humanities; Anne K.M., Et al., Building Capacity for Digital Humanities: A Framework for Institutional Planning, (2017); Barry J., Et al., Launching the Digital Humanities Movement at Washington and Lee University:A Case Study, The Academic Commons: For the Liberal Education Community, (2014); Bass R., Eynon B., Capturing the Visible Evidence of Invisible Learning, The Academic Commons: For the Liberal Education Community, (2014); Bass R., Eynon B., Open and Integrative: Designing Liberal Education for the New Digital Ecosystem, (2016); Brown S., Towards Best Practices in Collaborative Online Knowledge Production, Doing Digital Humanities: Practice, Training, Research, (2016); Burdick A., Drucker J., Lunenfeld P., Presner T., Schnapp J., Digital Humanities, (2012); Chodron P., When Things Fall Apart: Heart Advice for Difficult Times, (2016); Galey A., Ruecker S., How a Prototype Argues, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25, 4, pp. 405-424, (2010); Kolb D.A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, (1984); Mandell L., Promotion and Tenure for Digital Scholarship, Journal of Digital Humanities, 1, 4, (2012); Mauro A., Digital Liberal Arts and Project-Based Pedagogies, Doing Digital Humanities:Practice, Training, Research, (2016); McFall L.M., Simons J.T., Lord G., MacDonald P.J., David Nieves A., Young S., Chapter 2: Collaborations in Liberal Arts Colleges in Support of Digital Humanities, Technology-Centered Academic Library Partnerships and Collaborations, pp. 31-60, (2016); Moretti F., Literary Lab Pamphlet 12: Literature, Measured, Litlab, (2016); Posner M., Think Talk Make Do: Power and the Digital Humanities, Journal of the Digital Humanities, 1, 2, (2012); Posner M., No Half Measures: Overcoming Common Challenges to Doing Digital Humanities in the Library, Journal of Library Administration, 53, 1, pp. 43-52, (2013); Presner T., How to Evaluate Digital Scholarship, Journal of Digital Humanities, 1, 4, (2012); Rockenbach B.A., Digital Humanities in Libraries: New Models for Scholarly Engagement, (2013); Roy M., Either/Or? Both/And? Difficult Distinctions within the Digital Humanities, Educause Review, (2014); Siemens L., ‘It’s a team if you use “reply all”': An Exploration of Research Teams in Digital Humanities Environments, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 24, 2, pp. 225-233, (2009); DSH: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, (2009); Spiro L., Computing and Communicating Knowledge: Collaborative Approaches to Digital Humanities Projects, Collaborative Approaches to the Digital in English Studies, (2011); Taylor A.G., Joudrey D.N., The Organization of Information, (2009); Vinopal J., McCormick M., Supporting Digital Scholarship in Research Libraries: Scalability and Sustainability, Journal of Library Administration, 53, 1, pp. 27-42, (2013)
Nơi xuất bản
Taylor and Francis
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus