CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Utopianism, transindividuation, and foreign language education in the Japanese university

Tác giả

Kennedy D.

Năm xuất bản

2019

Source title

Educational Philosophy and Theory

Số trích dẫn

3

DOI

10.1080/00131857.2018.1472575

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85046666454&doi=10.1080%2f00131857.2018.1472575&partnerID=40&md5=e89f1940e1152e6c9bf3e08bb15cfc5b

Tóm tắt

This article examines the current state of foreign language education in Japanese universities as illustrative of the troubling conditions facing the liberal arts (i.e. the transformative arts) in a globalized neoliberal milieu. The utopian ideal in education has always insinuated, at the least, a pedagogy that inspires personal agency, creative investment, challenge to power and social change. This imagining of incalculable futures, however, has been undermined by the seemingly inevitable and confluent forces of a networked world, represented most forcefully by the socioeconomic reductionism of neoliberal globalism. In the context of contemporary Japanese higher education, these forces are joined by Japan’s uniquely ambivalent relationship with the ‘outside’ world, and manifested in the rigid conceptualizations that motivate deeply problematic government and institutional initiatives for the ‘globalization’ of higher education. Within the frame of Bernard Stiegler’s work on transindividuation (psychosocial transformation), this article critiques these influential practices as fundamentally antithetical to the challenge of engaging Japanese learners of foreign languages in sustainable ‘economies of contribution’—economies which foster critical engagement and which open paths to transindividuation. The article concludes by arguing for a radical reimagining of the landscape of foreign language pedagogy in Japan and for a repositioning of learners from ‘short-circuited’ semiotic consumers to ‘long-circuited’ semiosic participants. © 2018, © 2018 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia.

Từ khóa

foreign language education; higher education; Japan; transindividuation; Utopianism

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aspinall R.W., Globalization and English language education policy in Japan: External risk and internal inertia, Reimagining Japanese education: Borders, transfers, circulations, and the comparative, pp. 127-145, (2011); Atkinson D., Introduction: Cognitivism and second language acquisition, Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, pp. 1-23, (2011); Auge M., Non-places: An introduction to supermodernity, (1992); Block D., The social turn in second language acquisition, (2003); Bourdieu P., Language and symbolic power, (1991); Burgess C., Ambivalent Japan turns on its ‘insular’ youth: System discourages overseas study but students get blame, Japan Times, (2013); Byram M., From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship, (2008); Canagarajah S., Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations, (2013); Castoriadis C., The imaginary institution of society, (1975); Chilton M., Reconfiguring English literary studies in the Japanese academy, The future of English in Asia: Perspectives on language and literature, pp. 224-239, (2016); Dewey J., Democracy and education, (1916); Featherstone M., Stiegler’s university, Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 39, 3, pp. 289-306, (2017); Freire P., Pedagogy of the oppressed, (1970); Freire P., Pedagogy of the heart, (1997); Giddens A., Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age, (1991); Giroux H.A., On critical pedagogy, (2011); Giroux H.A., Neoliberalism’s war on higher education, (2014); Giroux H.A., Education and the crisis of public values: Challenging the assault on teachers, students, and public education, (2015); Halliday M.A.K., Language as social semiotic, (1978); Heinrich P., The making of monolingual Japan: Language ideology and Japanese modernity, (2012); Hodge R., Kress G., Social semiotics, (1988); Horiguchi S., Imoto Y., Poole G.S., Foreign language education in Japan: Exploring qualitative approaches, (2015); Ikeda M., From nurturing language proficiency to global competencies, Competency-based lesson design, pp. 157-181, (2015); Ikeda M., A third revolution in ELT?: CLIL as a methodology for competency-based language education, (2016); Ishikawa M., Redefining internationalization in higher education: Global 30 and the making of global universities in Japan, Reimagining Japanese education: Borders, transfers, circulations, and the comparative, pp. 193-223, (2011); Iwabuchi K., Complicit exoticism: Japan and its other, Continuum, 8, 2, pp. 49-82, (1994); Kubota R., Immigration, diversity and language education in Japan: Toward a glocal approach to teaching English, English in Japan in the era of globalization, pp. 101-122, (2011); Matsuda A., ‘Not everyone can be a star’: Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about English teaching in Japan, English in Japan in the era of globalization, pp. 38-59, (2011); Maturana H.R., Varela F.J., The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding, (1998); McNamara T., Roever C., Language testing: The social dimension, (2006); Report on the future improvement and enhancement of English education (Outline): Five recommendations on the English Education Reform Plan responding to the rapid globalization, (2014); Overview of the ministry of education, culture, sports, science and technology, (2017); Morita L., Japanese university students’ attitudes toward globalisation, intercultural contexts and English, World Journal of English Language, 3, 4, pp. 31-41, (2013); Norton B., Non-participation, imagined communities and the language classroom, Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research, pp. 159-171, (2001); Pavlenko A., Poststructuralist approaches to the study of social factors in second language learning and use, Portraits of the L2 user, pp. 277-302, (2002); Piller I., Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics, (2016); Roberts B., Technics, individuation and tertiary memory: Bernard Stiegler’s challenge to media theory, New Formations, 77, pp. 8-20, (2012); Sakai N., Nationality and the politics of the “Mother Tongue”, Deconstructing nationality, pp. 1-38, (2005); Seargeant P., The idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the evolution of a global language, (2009); Silverstein M., Language structure and linguistic ideology, The elements of a parasession on linguistic units and levels, pp. 193-247, (1979); Stiegler B., Derrida and technology: Fidelity at the limits of deconstruction and the prosthesis of faith (R. Beardsworth, Trans.), Jacques Derrida and the humanities: A critical reader, pp. 238-270, (2001); Stiegler B., The decadence of industrial democracies: Disbelief and discredit, Volume 1, (2004); Stiegler B., Symbolic misery: Volume 1, The hyperindustrial epoch, (2004); Stiegler B., Philosophising by accident: Interviews with Elie During, (2004); Stiegler B., Uncontrollable societies of disaffected individuals: Disbelief and discredit, Volume 2, (2006); Stiegler B., What makes life worth living: On pharmacology, (2010); Stiegler B., Memory, Critical terms for media studies, pp. 64-87, (2010); Stiegler B., States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the 21st century, (2012); Stiegler B., Relational ecology and the digital pharmakon, Culture machine, 13, pp. 1-19, (2012); Stiegler B., The anthropocene and neganthropology, (2014); Taylor V.L., Japan’s universities reach for global status, East Asia Forum Quarterly, 6, 3, pp. 38-40, (2014); (2018); Toh G., English as medium of instruction in Japanese higher education: Presumption, mirage or bluff?, (2016); Van Lier L., The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective, (2004); Willis D.B., Rappleye J., Reimagining Japanese education in the global conversation: Borders, transfers, circulations, and the comparative, pp. 15-49, (2011); Winnicott D.W., Playing and reality, (1971); Yamagami M., Tollefson J.W., Elite discourses of globalization in Japan: The role of English, English in Japan in the era of globalization, pp. 15-37, (2011); Yonezawa A., Japan’s challenge of fostering “Global Human Resources”: Policy debates and practices, Japan Labor Review, 11, 2, pp. 37-52, (2014)

Nơi xuất bản

Routledge

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus