Tiêu đề

Integrating liberal education, business, and high-impact practices – the case of George Mason university’s school of business

Tác giả

Magro A.; Gring-Pemble L.M.; Bishop C.R.

Năm xuất bản


Source title

Journal of International Education in Business

Số trích dẫn




Liên kết

Tóm tắt

Purpose: In College Learning for the New Global Century, the National Leadership Council of Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP) argue for a liberal education for all students because “(i)n an economy fueled by innovation, the capabilities developed through a liberal education have become America’s most valuable economic asset.” (LEAP, 2007). The Business for a Better World Center and the School of Business at George Mason University endorse this view and have applied the liberal education approach to the study of business. This paper aims to explore the current environment of business education, the role of liberal education and the school’s programs and their benefits. Design/methodology/approach: This paper relies on a case-study approach. Findings: In this paper, the authors explore how George Mason University’s School of Business brings a liberal education approach to business education and draws on a combination of high impact practices, such as first-year seminars, common intellectual experiences, learning communities, collaborative assignments, undergraduate research, community-based learning, internships, capstone courses and projects and diversity and global learning (Kuh, 2008). Mason’s experience demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of this integration. Originality/value: This case study provides unique insight into how business schools can integrate a liberal education approach into business education with successful results. As such, the paper contributes to the growing body of research on the benefits of liberal arts and business education models as a means of addressing global goals and provides a valuable case study to understand better the necessity of integrative, interdisciplinary learning. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Từ khóa

Business education; George Mason university; High impact practices; Liberal education

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allison C., Linking leadership and the liberal arts, (2019); What Liberal Education Looks like: What It is, Who It’s for, and Where It Happens, (2020); Bobko P., Tejeda M., Liberal arts and management education: re-emphasizing the link for the 21st century, Journal of Business Education, 1, pp. 1-10, (2000); Brooks D., Everyone a changemaker, (2018); Chew E.B., McInnis-Bowers C., Blending liberal art and business education: liberal education, Online Winter, 90, 1, (2004); Conn S., Business schools have no business in the university, (2018); Denning S., The economist defends 'the world's dumbest idea', (2016); Fink L., A sense of purpose: Harvard law school forum on corporate governance, (2018); Finley A., McNair T., Assessing Underserved Students’ Engagement in High-Impact Practices, (2013); Who and what is GRLI?, (2021); Gring-Pemble L., Magro A., Brown J., Educating business leaders for a better world at George mason university, Redesigning Liberal Education: Innovative Design for a Twenty-First Century Undergraduate Education, (2020); Kuh G., High-Impact practices: a brief overview, (2008); Kuh G., Kinzie J., What really makes a ‘High-Impact’ practice high impact?, (2018); Kuh G., O'Donnell K., Ensuring Quality and Taking High-Impact Practices to Scale, (2013); Kuh G., O'Donnell K., Geary Schneider C., HIPs at ten, Change, (2017); Lopatto D., Exploring the benefits of undergraduate research experiences: the SURE survey, Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science, pp. 112-132, (2008); Moner W., Motley P., Pope-Ruark R., Redesigning Liberal Education: Innovative Design for a Twenty-First Century Undergraduate Education, (2020); College Learning for the New Global Century: A Report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise, (2007); Paino T., The reflective practitioner: the role of a public liberal-arts university in saving liberal education, On the Horizon, 22, 1, pp. 72-74, (2014); Parker M., Bulldoze the business school, (2018); Pazich L., The power of academic friendship, (2018); Phillips K., How diversity makes Us smarter, (2014); Polman P., What CEOs say, (2019); What is PRME?, (2021); Best young universities in the world, (2021); Campus ethnic diversity: national universities, (2021); Valbrun M., Maybe not so ‘high impact’?, (2018); Davos manifesto, (1973); Zakaria F., Defense of a Liberal Education, (2016); Zhao C., Kuh G., Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement, (2004); What is liberal education?, (2021); Estrada T., A multidisciplinary capstone project experience in a small liberal arts college setting: the hybrid solar tracker, (2013); Fleming T., Stanway A., Enhancing first-year student engagement: collaborative practice in a core business unit, Journal of International Education in Business, 7, 2, pp. 137-149, (2014); Haines S., McClure C., Out in the field: experiential learning through university community partnerships, University-Community Partnerships for Promoting Social Responsibility in Higher Education, 2, pp. 121-135, (2020); Pan G., Poh-Sun S., Koh G., Examining learning transformation in project-based learning process, Journal of International Education in Business, 12, 2, pp. 167-180, (2019); Porter S., Pentz M., Accounting and conflict resolution in Ireland, International Journal of Education in Business, 2, 2, pp. 122-135, (2013); Reeves A., Classroom collaborations: enabling sustainability education via student-community co-learning, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20, 8, (2019); Shareholder value; analyse this, The Economist, 419, 8983, (2016); Tufano P., A bolder vision for business schools, (2020); 2020 Davos manifesto, (2019)

Nơi xuất bản

Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.

Hình thức xuất bản


Open Access