CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
“Is there a bubble to burst?”-college students’ spatial perception of campus and the city, a case study of rhodes college in memphis, TN
Tác giả
Yu S.; Bryant M.; Messmer E.; Tsagronis S.; Link S.
Năm xuất bản
2018
Source title
Urban Geography
Số trích dẫn
14
DOI
10.1080/02723638.2018.1481602
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This paper builds on the study of student geography by critically examining college students’ perceived space of a university campus and the surrounding urban space. Rhodes College is a liberal arts college situated in the city of Memphis. As a campus with a majority white population located in a predominately black city, Rhodes College exists within but often separate from the city. It serves as a perfect case study to investigate how the college students build relationships with the environment within and beyond the campus. By using mental mapping and focus groups, this research unpacks four spatialities that shape college students’ perception of the urban space: (in)activity space, (im)mobility, boundaries, and center. This research demonstrates that student geography can be gendered, classed and racialized. The perceived space is socially constructed, and is reinforced by the lived and material space. Finally, this paper provides implications to facilitate deeper connections between students, the campus, and the city. © 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Từ khóa
critical geography; Memphis; Mental mapping; student geography
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adey P., Mobility, (2009); Al-Kodmany K., Visualization Tools and Methods in Community Planning: From Freehand Sketches to Virtual Reality, CPL Bibliography, 17, pp. 189-211, (2002); Andersson J., Sadgrove J., Valentine G., Consuming campus: Geographies of encounter at a British university, Social & Cultural Geography, 13, 5, pp. 501-515, (2012); Baldwin D.L., The ‘800-Pound Gargoyle’: The Long History of Higher Education and Urban Development on Chicago’s South Side, American Quarterly, 67, 1, pp. 81-103, (2015); Boschmann E.E., Cubbon E., Sketch Maps and Qualitative GIS: Using Cartographies of Individual Spatial Narratives in Geographic Research, The Professional Geographer, 66, 2, pp. 236-248, (2014); Brooks R., Byford K., Sela K., Students’ unions, consumerism and the neo-liberal university, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37, 8, pp. 1211-1228, (2016); Brown M., Knopp L., Queering the Map: The Productive Tensions of Colliding Epistemologies, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98, 1, pp. 40-58, (2008); Buttimer A., Home, Reach, and the Sense of Place, the Human experience of space and place, pp. 166-187, (1978); Chatterton P., University students and city centres–The formation of exclusive geographies: The case of Bristol, UK, Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 30, 2, pp. 117-133, (1999); Chatterton P., The Cultural Role of Universities in the Community: Revisiting the University—Community Debate, Environment and Planning A, 32, 1, pp. 165-181, (2000); Christie H., Higher education and spatial (im)mobility: Nontraditional students and living at home, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39, 10, pp. 2445-2463, (2007); Clayton J., Crozier G., Reay D., Home and away: Risk, familiarity and the multiple geographies of the higher education experience, International Studies in Sociology of Education, 19, 3-4, pp. 157-174, (2009); Cope M., Elwood S., Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach, (2009); Coulton C.J., Korbin J., Chan T., Su M., Mapping Residents’ Perceptions of Neighborhood Boundaries: A Methodological Note, American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 2, pp. 371-383, (2001); Cresswell T., Mobilities I: Catching up, Progress in Human Geography, 35, 4, pp. 550-558, (2011); Curtis J.W., Transcribing from the Mind to the Map: Tracing the Evolution of a Concept, Geographical Review, 106, 3, pp. 338-359, (2016); Curtis J.W., Integrating Sketch Maps with GIS to Explore Fear of Crime in the Urban Environment: A Review of the Past and Prospects for the Future, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 39, 4, pp. 175-186, (2012); Curtis J.W., Et al., The Prospects and Problems of Integrating Sketch Maps with Geographic Information Systems to Understand Environmental Perception: A Case Study of Mapping Youth Fear in Los Angeles Gang Neighborhoods, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41, 2, pp. 251-271, (2014); Dennis S.F., Prospects for Qualitative GIS at the Intersection of Youth Development and Participatory Urban Planning, Environment and Planning A, 38, 11, pp. 2039-2054, (2006); Doran B.J., Lees B.G., Investigating the spatiotemporal links between disorder, crime, and the fear of crime, The Professional Geographer, 57, pp. 1-12, (2005); Fallov A., Mia A.J., Knudsen L.B., Mobile Forms of Belonging, Mobilities, 8, 4, pp. 467-486, (2013); Gieseking J.J., (Re)constructing women: Scaled portrayals of privilege and gender norms on campus, Area, 39, 3, pp. 278-286, (2007); Gieseking J.J., Where We Go From Here: The Mental Sketch Mapping Method and Its Analytic Components, Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 9, pp. 712-724, (2013); Gillespie C.A., How Culture Constructs Our Sense of Neighborhood: Mental Maps and Children’s Perceptions of Place, Journal of Geography, 109, 1, pp. 18-29, (2010); Goddard J.B., Chatterton P., Regional Development Agencies and the Knowledge Economy: Harnessing the Potential of Universities, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17, 6, pp. 685-699, (1999); Goodchild B., Class differences in environmental perception: An exploratory study, Urban Studies, 11, 2, pp. 157-169, (1974); Goodey J., BOYS DON’T CRY. Masculinities, Fear of Crime and Fearlessness, The British Journal of Criminology, 37, 3, pp. 401-418, (1997); Hanhardt C.B., Safe Space: Gay Neighborhood History and the Politics of Violence, (2013); Holdsworth C., ‘Don’t you think you’re missing out, living at home?’ Student experiences and residential transitions, The Sociological Review, 54, 3, pp. 495-519, (2006); Holton M., a. “‘I Already Know the City, I Don’t Have to explore it’: Adjustments to ‘Sense of Place’ for ‘Local’ UK University Students.”, Population, Space and Place, 21, 8, pp. 820-831, (2015); Holton M., “Learning the rules of the ‘student game’: Transforming the ‘student habitus’ through [im]mobility.”, Environment and Planning A, 47, 11, pp. 2373-2388, (2015); Holton M., “Adapting relationships with place: Investigating the evolving place attachment and ‘sense of place’ of UK higher education students during a period of intense transition.”, Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 59, pp. 21-29, (2015); Holton M., The geographies of UK university halls of residence: Examining students’ embodiment of social capital, Children’s Geographies, 14, 1, pp. 63-76, (2016); Holton M., Riley M., Student Geographies: Exploring the Diverse Geographies of Students and Higher Education, Geography Compass, 7, 1, pp. 61-74, (2013); Holton M., Riley M., Talking on the move: Place-based interviewing with undergraduate students, Area, 46, 1, pp. 59-65, (2014); Hopkins P., Towards critical geographies of the university campus: Understanding the contested experiences of Muslim students, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 1, pp. 157-169, (2011); Hubbard P., Geographies of Studentification and Purpose-Built Student Accommodation: Leading Separate Lives?, Environment and Planning A, 41, 8, pp. 1903-1923, (2009); Jones D.R., Restorative, heterotopic spacing for campus sustainability, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35, 4, pp. 752-771, (2017); Karan P.P., Bladen W.A., Singh G., Slum Dwellers’ and Squatters’ Images of the City, Environment and Behavior, 12, 1, pp. 81-100, (1980); Kelley M.J., Pendras M., Minnella H., Sketching culture, sketching nature: Uncovering anchors of everyday nature for urban youth, Social & Cultural Geography, 13, 8, pp. 873-893, (2012); Kitchin R.M., Cognitive Maps: What are they and why study them?, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 1, pp. 1-19, (1994); Koskela H., Pain R., Revisiting fear and place: Women’s fear of attack and the built environment, Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 31, 2, pp. 269-280, (2000); Kwan M.-P., From oral histories to visual narratives: Re-presenting the post-September 11 experiences of the Muslim women in the USA, Social & Cultural Geography, 9, 6, pp. 653-669, (2008); Kwan M.-P., Ding G., Geo-Narrative: Extending Geographic Information Systems for Narrative Analysis in Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research, The Professional Geographer, 60, 4, pp. 443-465, (2008); Lefebvre H., The Production of Space, (1991); Liu C., Sui D., Exploring the spatiotemporal pattern of cyberbullying with yik yak, The Professional Geographer, 69, 3, pp. 412-423, (2017); Low S., Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America, (2004); Lynch K., The Image of the City, (1960); Matei S., Ball-Rokeach S.J., Qiu J.L., Fear and misperception of Los Angeles urban space a spatial-statistical study of communication-shaped mental maps, Communication Research, 28, 4, pp. 429-463, (2001); Maurer R., Baxter J.C., Images of the neighborhood and city among Black-, Anglo-, and Mexican-American children, Environment and Behavior, 4, (1972); Munro M., Turok I., Livingston M., Students in Cities: A Preliminary Analysis of Their Patterns and Effects, Environment and Planning A, 41, 8, pp. 1805-1825, (2009); Pain R., MacFarlane R., Turner K., Gill S., ‘When, where, if, and but’: Qualifying GIS and the effect of streetlighting on crime and fear, Environment and Planning A, 38, 11, pp. 2055-2074, (2006); Pearsall H., Hawthorne T., Block D., Walker B.L.E., Masucci M., Exploring youth socio-spatial perceptions of higher education landscapes through sketch maps, (2015); Pocock D., Hudson R., Images of the Urban Environment, (1978); Powell K., Making sense of place: Mapping as a multisensory research method, Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 7, pp. 539-555, (2010); Prazeres L., International and Intra-national Student Mobility: Trends, Motivations and Identity, Geography Compass, 7, 11, pp. 804-820, (2013); Relph E.C., Place and Placelessness, (1976); Rose G., Imagining Poplar in the 1920s: Contested concepts of community, Journal of Historical Geography, 16, 4, pp. 425-437, (1990); Rushing W., Memphis and the Paradox of Place: Globalization in the American South, (2009); Silvey R., A Wrench in the Global Works: Anti-Sweatshop Activism on Campus, Antipode, 36, 2, pp. 191-197, (2004); Smith D.P., ‘Student geographies’, urban restructuring, and the expansion of higher education, Environment and Planning A, 41, 8, pp. 1795-1804, (2009); Soja E.W., Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places, (1996); Tamboukou M., Of other spaces: Women’s colleges at the turn of the nineteenth century in the UK, Gender, Place and Culture, 7, 3, pp. 247-263, (2000); Tuan Y., Images and Mental Maps, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 65, 2, pp. 205-213, (1975); Tuan Y.-F., Space and place: the perspective of experience, (1977); Wridt P., A qualitative GIS approach to mapping urban neighborhoods with children to promote physical activity and child-friendly community planning, Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 37, 1, (2010); Yu S., “I Am Like a Deaf, Dumb and Blind Person’: Mobility and Immobility of Chinese (Im)Migrants in Flushing, Queens, New York City, Journal of Transport Geography, 54, pp. 10-21, (2016)
Nơi xuất bản
Routledge
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus