CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Teachers' professional reading program in higher education: An evaluation

Tác giả

Pattaguan E.J.; Surla R.A.; Tindowen D.J.C.

Năm xuất bản

2019

Source title

Universal Journal of Educational Research

Số trích dẫn

1

DOI

10.13189/ujer.2019.071005

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073150610&doi=10.13189%2fujer.2019.071005&partnerID=40&md5=fa2f293f47ea1aaafceb473912c9707f

Tóm tắt

This study was conducted to describe the professional readings of teachers of the School of Education, Arts and Sciences and to evaluate the effectiveness of the Project READS Program of the university. The respondents of the study were the 31 full-time and part-time faculty members of the School of Education, Arts and Sciences of the School Year 2018-2019. The results revealed that Teacher Education and Liberal Arts educators are engaged in professional readings focusing on instructional strategies and assessment techniques. Furthermore, the Project READS program of the university is effective and sustainable as it attains its goal in enhancing the teaching process among Liberal Arts and Teacher Education faculty members. Copyright © 2019 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License

Từ khóa

Effectiveness; Liberal Arts; Project READS; Reading Program; Teacher Education

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aljughaiman A., Mowrer-Reynolds E.L.I.Z.A., Teachers' conceptions of creativity and creative students, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 1, pp. 17-34, (2005); Applegate A.J., Applegate M.D., The Peter effect: Reading habits and attitudes of preservice teachers, Reading Teacher, 57, 6, pp. 554-565, (2004); Borko H., Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain, Educational Researcher, 33, 8, pp. 3-15, (2004); Blair T.R., Rupley W.H., Nichols W.D., The effective teacher of reading: Considering the “what” and “how” of instruction, The Reading Teacher, 60, 5, pp. 432-438, (2007); Cantrell S.C., Hughes H.K., Teacher efficacy and content literacy implementation: An exploration of the effects of extended professional development with coaching, Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 1, pp. 95-127, (2008); Coburn C.E., Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 2, pp. 145-170, (2001); Day R., Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading, Reading in a Foreign Language, 14, 2, (2002); Dede C., Jass Ketelhut D., Whitehouse P., Breit L., McCloskey E.M., A research agenda for online teacher professional development, Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 1, pp. 8-19, (2009); Desimone L.M., Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures, Educational Researcher, 38, 3, pp. 181-199, (2009); Doubek M.B., Cooper E.J., Closing the gap through professional development: Implications for reading research, Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 3, pp. 411-415, (2007); Foster C., Inglis M., Mathematics teacher professional journals: What topics appear and how has this changed over time?, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, pp. 1-22, (2018); Guthrie J.T., Teaching for literacy engagement, Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 1, pp. 1-30, (2004); Guthrie J.T., Wigfield A., You W., Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading, Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 601-634, (2012); Hasbrouck J., Tindal G.A., Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers, The Reading Teacher, 59, 7, pp. 636-644, (2006); Hinrichs S., Ruhl-Smith C., Keeping current: A research study of educators' reading habits, Journal of Texas State Reading Association, 5, pp. 77-82, (1998); Hixson N., Ravitz J., Whisman A., Extended Professional Development in Project-Based Learning: Impacts on 21st Century Teaching and Student Achievement, (2012); Macalister J., Investigating teacher attitudes to extensive reading practices in higher education: Why isn't everyone doing it?, Relc Journal, 41, 1, pp. 59-75, (2010); McNiff J., Action Research for Professional Development: Concise Advice for New Action Researchers, (2010); Murawski W.W., School collaboration research: Successes and difficulties, Academic Exchange Quarterly, 7, 3, pp. 104-109, (2003); Opfer V.D., Pedder D., Conceptualizing teacher professional learning, Review of Educational Research, 81, 3, pp. 376-407, (2011); Pattaguan E.J.P., To be on top: A sustained outcomes-based accountancy education experience, Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 7, 3, (2016); Piasta S.B., Connor C.M., Fishman B.J., Morrison F.J., Teachers' knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth, Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 3, pp. 224-248, (2009); Podhajski B., Mather N., Nathan J., Sammons J., Professional development in scientifically based reading instruction: Teacher knowledge and reading outcomes, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 5, pp. 403-417, (2009); Poskitt J., Towards a model of New Zealand school-based teacher professional development, New Zealand Journal of Teachers' Work, 2, 2, pp. 136-151, (2005); Powell M.P., Teachers and Professional Reading: A Study of Reading Experience and Administrative Support across Traditional, Paideia, and PDS Schools, (2006); Rambo S.M., Professional Reading and High Quality Professional Development, (2012); Ross J., Bruce C., Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of randomized field trial, The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 1, pp. 50-60, (2007); Sanders S., Critical and creative thinkers in mathematics classrooms, Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 6, 1, pp. 19-27, (2016); Sparks D., Designing Powerful Professional Development for Teachers and Principals, (2002); Taylor B.M., Pearson P.D., Peterson D.S., Rodriguez M.C., The CIERA school change framework: An evidence-based approach to professional development and school reading improvement, Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 1, pp. 40-69, (2005); Timperley H., Wilson A., Barrar H., Fung I., Teacher Professional Learning and Development, (2008); Tindowen D.J.C., Bassig J.M., Cagurangan J.A., Twenty-First-Century skills of alternative learning system learners, SAGE Open, 7, 3, (2017); Tindowen D.J., Guzman J., Macanang D., Teachers' conception and difficulties in doing action research, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7, 8, pp. 1787-1794, (2019); Vescio V., Ross D., Adams A., A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1, pp. 80-91, (2008)

Nơi xuất bản

Horizon Research Publishing

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

All Open Access; Gold Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus