CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Faculty development in liberal arts colleges: a look at divisional trends, preferences, and needs
Tác giả
Baker V.L.; Pifer M.J.; Lunsford L.G.
Năm xuất bản
2018
Source title
Higher Education Research and Development
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1080/07294360.2018.1483901
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This research explores faculty development through the lens of academic division as an important, career defining characteristic of the professoriate. Relying on data from a longitudinal, mixed-methods study, the authors examined faculty development trends and needed supports in a consortium of 13 liberal arts colleges (LACs). As part of this research, the authors feature the Alignment Framework for Faculty Development in Liberal Arts Colleges to help administrators, faculty developers, and faculty members situate faculty development efforts at the intersection of institutional goals and priorities and individual needs. Implications for research and practice are offered. © 2018, © 2018 HERDSA.
Từ khóa
alignment framework; divisional trends; Faculty development
Tài liệu tham khảo
Austin A.E., Sorcinelli M.D., The future of faculty development: Where are we going?, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013, 133, pp. 85-97, (2013); Baker V.L., Baldwin R.G., A case study of liberal arts colleges in the 21st century: Understanding organizational change and evolution in higher education, Innovative Higher Education, 40, 3, pp. 247-261, (2015); Baker V.L., Baldwin R.G., Makker S., Where are they now? Revisiting Breneman’s study of liberal arts colleges, Liberal Education, 98, 3, pp. 48-53, (2012); Baker V.L., Lunsford L.G., Pifer M.J., Developing faculty in liberal arts colleges: Aligning individual needs and organizational goals, (2017); Baker V.L., Pifer M.J., Lunsford L.G., Faculty challenges across rank in liberal arts colleges: A human resources perspective, Journal of Faculty Development, 30, 1, pp. 21-27, (2016); Baker V.L., Terosky A.L., Martinez E., Faculty members’ scholarly learning across institutional types, ASHE Higher Education Report, 43, 2, pp. 9-138, (2017); Baldwin R.G., Faculty career stages and implications for professional development, Faculty and faculty issues in colleges and universities., pp. 551-561, (1996); Baldwin R.G., Blackburn R.T., The academic career as a developmental process: Implications for higher education, The Journal of Higher Education, 52, 6, pp. 598-614, (1981); Beach A.L., Sorcinelli M.D., Austin A.E., Rivard J.K., Faculty development in the age of evidence: Current practices, future imperatives, (2016); Braskamp L.A., Defining faculty work, Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance, pp. 33-51, (1994); Chism N.V.N., Gosling D., Sorcinelli M.D., International faculty development, A guide to faculty development, pp. 243-258, (2010); Cook C., Heath F., Thompson R.L., A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 6, pp. 821-836, (2000); Cross J.G., Goldenberg E.N., Why hire non-tenure-track faculty?, Peer Review, 5, 1, pp. 25-28, (2002); Diaz M.J.F., Santaolalla R.C., Gonzalez A.G., Faculty attitudes and training needs to respond to the new European higher education challenges, Higher Education, 60, 1, pp. 101-118, (2010); Fairweather J.S., The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making, The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 1, pp. 26-48, (2002); Gappa J., Austin A., Trice A., Rethinking faculty work, (2007); Gratton L., Truss C., The three-dimensional people strategy: Putting human resources policies into action, The Academy of Management Executive, 17, 3, pp. 74-86, (2003); Healey M., Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach, Higher Education Research & Development, 19, 2, pp. 169-189, (2000); Jaschik S., Inside HigherEd, (2017); Jones A., Lygo-Baker S., Markless S., Rienties B., Di Napoli R., Conceptualizing impact in academic development: Finding a way through, Higher Education Research & Development, 36, 1, pp. 116-128, (2017); Kezar A., Sam C., ASHE Higher Education Report Series1, (2010); Labi A., The Chronicle of Higher Education, (2011); Mooney K.M., Reder M., Faculty development at small and liberal arts colleges, To improve the academy, pp. 158-172, (2007); Neumann A., Professing to learn: Creating tenured lives and careers in the American research university, (2009); Ouellett M., Overview of faculty development: History and choices, A guide to faculty development, pp. 3-20, (2010); Pifer M.J., Baker V.L., Lunsford L.G., Colleagues, culture, and leadership: The academic department as a location of faculty experiences in liberal arts colleges, Review of Higher Education; Redden E., Inside HigherEd, (2009); Reder M., Mooney K., Holmgren R.A., Kuerbis P.J., Starting and sustaining successful faculty development programs at small colleges, To Improve the Academy, 27, pp. 267-286, (2009); Ross C., Teaching renewal for midcareer faculty: Attending to the whole person, To Improve the Academy, 34, 1-2, pp. 270-289, (2015); Roxa T., Martensson K., Strategic educational development: A national Swedish initiative to support change in higher education, Higher Education Research & Development, 27, 2, pp. 155-168, (2008); Seldin P., Tailoring faculty development programs to faculty career stages, To Improve the Academy, 24, pp. 137-146, (2006); Sorcinelli M.D., Austin A.E., Eddy P.L., Beach A.L., Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present, (2006); Sorcinelli M.D., Gray T., Birch A.J., Faculty development beyond instructional development, To Improve the Academy, 30, pp. 247-261, (2011); Sorcinelli M.D., Yun J.H., When mentoring is the medium: Lessons learned from a faculty development initiative, To Improve the Academy, 27, pp. 365-384, (2009); Stigmar M., Faculty development through an educational action programme, Higher Education Research & Development, 27, 2, pp. 107-120, (2008); Strage A., Merdinger J., Professional growth and renewal for mid-career faculty, The Journal of Faculty Development, 29, 1, pp. 41-50, (2015); Terosky A.L., Gonzales L.D., Scholarly learning as vocation: A study of community and broad access liberal arts college faculty, Innovative Higher Education, 41, 2, pp. 105-120, (2016); Tierney W.G., Rhoads R.A., Faculty socialization as a cultural process: A mirror of institutional commitment, (1994); Webb S., Science Magazine, (2008)
Nơi xuất bản
Routledge
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus