CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
The Impact of a Technology Ban on Students’ Perceptions and Performance in Introduction to Psychology
Tác giả
Hutcheon T.G.; Lian A.; Richard A.
Năm xuất bản
2019
Source title
Teaching of Psychology
Số trích dẫn
8
DOI
10.1177/0098628318816141
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
To test the impact of the implementation of technology bans on students’ experience within a course, we collected data from four sections of Introduction to Psychology at a small liberal arts college in the northeast. In two sections, students were banned from using personal technology devices during lecture. In the other two sections, students were permitted to use personal technology devices freely during lecture. We found a significant reduction in student engagement but not in reported interest in psychology or perceived professor–student rapport for students in the technology-ban condition relative to students in the technology-permitted condition. In contrast to previous studies, we found no difference in final grade performance across condition. Although further research is needed, these results suggest that instructors should consider the composition of students in their course prior to implementing a technology ban in the classroom. © The Author(s) 2018.
Từ khóa
college and university teaching; student engagement; student learning; technology use in the classroom
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen P.A., Grabbe J., McCarthy A., Bush A.H., Wallace B., The early bird does not get the worm: Time-of-day effects on college students’ basic cognitive processing, American Journal of Psychology, 121, pp. 551-564, (2008); Baker W.M., Lusk E.J., Neuhauser K.L., On the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the classroom: Evidence from a survey of faculty and students, Journal of Education for Business, 87, pp. 275-289, (2012); Barak M., Lipson A., Lerman S., Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, pp. 245-263, (2006); Benson A.T., Cohen L.A., Buskist W., Rapport: Its relation to student attitudes and behaviors toward teachers and classes, Teaching of Psychology, 32, pp. 237-239, (2005); Bjornsen C.A., Archer K.J., Relations between students’ cell phone use during class and grades, Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in Psychology, 1, pp. 326-336, (2015); Carter S.P., Greenberg K., Walker M., The impact of computer usage on academic performance: Evidence from a randomized trial at the United States Military Academy, Economics of Education Review, 56, pp. 118-132, (2017); Fried C.B., In class laptop use and its effects on student learning, Computers & Education, 50, pp. 906-914, (2008); Garcia T., Pintrich P.R., The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, pp. 477-486, (1996); Green S., I’m banning laptops from my classroom, The Wall Street Journal, (2016); Griffin B.W., Perceived autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and student ratings of instruction, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 51, pp. 116-125, (2016); Handelsman M.M., Briggs W.L., Sullivan N., Towler A., A measure of college student course engagement, The Journal of Educational Research, 98, pp. 184-191, (2005); Harackiewicz J.M., Barron K.E., Tauer J.M., Carter S.M., Elliot A.J., Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time, Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, pp. 316-330, (2000); Hembrooke H., Gay G., The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15, pp. 46-64, (2003); Hulleman C.S., Godes O., Hendricks B.L., Harackiewicz J.L., Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention, Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, pp. 880-895, (2010); Hutcheon T.G., Technology bans and student experience in the college classroom, Essays from E-xcellence in Teaching, 17, pp. 40-44, (2018); Junco R., Cotton S.R., No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance, Computers & Education, 59, pp. 505-514, (2012); Katz L., Today’s lesson: Life in the classroom before cell phones, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2014); Kuh G.D., What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35, pp. 24-32, (2003); Mueller P.A., Oppenheimer D.M., The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking, Psychological Science, 25, pp. 1159-1168, (2014); Onyper S.B., Thacher P.V., Gilbert J.W., Gradess S.G., Class start times, sleep, and academic performance in college students, Chronobiology International, 29, pp. 318-335, (2012); Poirier C.P., Feldman R.S., Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes, Teaching of Psychology, 34, pp. 194-196, (2007); Ragan E.D., Jennings S.R., Massey J.D., Doolittle P.E., Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes, Computers & Education, 78, pp. 78-86, (2014); Ravizza S.M., Uitvlugt M.G., Fenn K.M., Logged in and zoned out: How laptop internet use relates to classroom learning, Psychological Science, 28, pp. 171-180, (2016); Rosenblum D., Leave your laptops at the door to my classroom, The New York Times, (2017); Sana F., Weston T., Cepeda N., Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers, Computers & Education, 62, pp. 24-31, (2013); Stothart C., Mitchum A., Yehnert C., The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, pp. 893-897, (2015); Stroebe W., Why good teaching evaluations may reward bad teaching: On grade inflation and other unintended consequences of student evaluations, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, pp. 800-816, (2016); Svanum S., Bigatti S.M., Academic course engagement during one semester forecasts college success: Engaged students are more likely to earn a degree, do it faster, and do it better, Journal of College Student Development, 50, pp. 120-132, (2000); Wilson J.H., Ryan R.G., Professor–student rapport scale: Six items predict student outcomes, Teaching of Psychology, 40, pp. 130-133, (2013); Wilson J.H., Ryan R.G., Pugh J.L., Professor–student rapport scale predicts student outcomes, Teaching of Psychology, 37, pp. 246-251, (2010)
Nơi xuất bản
SAGE Publications Inc.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus