CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Liberalising legal education
Tác giả
Bradney A.
Năm xuất bản
2019
Source title
The Law School - Global Issues, Local Questions
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.4324/9780429438110-1
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
The notion of liberal education is neither specific to law nor to university education. Its focus begins with the proposition that education is an education for life and that life is not solely concerned with material or utilitarian matters. The idea of a humane centre, a culture which liberal education tries to protect, can be taken to imply a static body of texts which constitute that culture or centre which must be preserved and taught. University legal education in the common-law world has commonly been aggressively atheoretical and anti-intellectual. To be a liberal education a legal education needs to be more than a Leavisite liberal education and needs to include an education in theory. Law schools both believe in, and know very little about, liberal education. Liberal education was both there to preserve ‘the humane centre’ and there to tell the student what ‘the humane centre’ was. © Fiona Cownie 1999.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
The First Report on Legal Education, (1996); Alldridge P., Whats wrong with the traditional criminal law course?’, Legal Studies, 10, pp. 38-62, (1990); Atkin L., Law as an educational subject, Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law, pp. 27-31, (1932); Bankowski Z., Law, love and computers, The Edinburgh Law Review, pp. 25-42, (1996); Barnett R., The Idea of Higher Education, (1990); Belsey C., Critical Practice, (1980); Bousfield A., The voice of liberal learning: Is there still room for the “idea of a university in 1996?’, The University in a Liberal State, (1996); Bright S., What, and how, should we be teaching?, The Law Teacher, 25, pp. 11-25, (1991); Brownsword R., Teaching contract: A liberal agenda, Examining The Law Syllabus: The Core, (1992); Carrington P., Of law and the river, Journal of Legal Education, 34, pp. 222-228, (1984); Cramton R., Demystifying legal scholarship, Georgetown Law Journal, 75, pp. 1-17, (1986); Davies M., University culture or intellectual culture?, The University in a Liberal State, (1996); Donne J., Seventeenth meditation, Selected Prose, (1987); Doyle B., English and Englishness, (1989); Eagleton T., Literary Theory: An Introduction, (1983); Evans C., English People, (1993); Feldman D., The nature of legal scholarship, Modem Law Review, 52, pp. 498-517, (1989); Housman A.E., Introductory essay, Selected Prose, (1961); Jones M., Textbook on Torts, (1996); King B., The New English Literatures, (1980); Kronman A., Legal scholarship and moral education, Yale Law Journal, 90, pp. 955-969, (1981); Leavis F.R., The literary imagination, Scrutiny, 1, pp. 20-32, (1932); Leavis F.R., Wordsworth, Scrutiny, 3, pp. 234-257, (1934); Leavis F.R., Thought and “emotional quality”: Notes in the analysis of poetry’, Scrutiny, 13, pp. 53-71, (1945); Leavis F.R., Education and the University, (1948); Leavis F.R., Henry james and the function of criticism, Scrutiny, 15, pp. 98-104, (1948); Leavis F.R., Mr pryce-jones, the british council and british culture, Scrutiny, 18, pp. 224-228, (1951); Leavis F.R., The responsible critic, Scrutiny, 19, pp. 162-183, (1953); Leavis F.R., The Great Tradition, (1962); Leavis F.R., The Common Pursuit, (1962); Leavis F.R., English Literature in Our Time and the University, (1969); Leavis F.R., The Living Principle, (1975); Leavis F.R., The Critic as Anti-Philosopher, (1982); Lewis G., Lord Atkin, (1987); MacFarlane J., Jeeves M., Boon A., Education for life or for work?, New Law Journal, 137, pp. 835-836, (1987); MacKillop I., A Life in Criticism, (1995); Martin P., Of law and the river, and of nihilism and academic freedom’, Journal of Legal Education, 35, pp. 1-26, (1985); Monly R., Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, (1990); Mulhem F., The Moment Of, (1981); Rawls J., The priority of right and ideas of the good, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 17, pp. 251-276, (1988); Steiner G., Poem into Poem, (1970); Sugarman D., Legal theory, the common law mind and the making of the textbook tradition, Legal Theory and Common Law, (1986); Thomson A., Critical legal education, Critical Legal Studies, (1990); Welleck R., Literary criticism and philosophy, Scrutiny, 5, pp. 375-383, (1937); Welleck R., The Attack on Literature and Other Essays, (1983); Welleck R., Warren A., Theory of Literature, (1973); Wilson G., English legal scholarship, Modem Law Review, 50, pp. 818-854, (1987); Wyatt J., Commitment to Higher Education, (1990); Xianling Z., Getting Used to Dying, (1991); Young M., The Rise of the Meritocracy, (1961)
Nơi xuất bản
Taylor and Francis
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus