CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

The ethical costs of using higher education for economic mobility

Tác giả

Webster D.

Năm xuất bản

2022

Source title

Theory and Research in Education

Số trích dẫn

0

DOI

10.1177/14778785221142865

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85143629517&doi=10.1177%2f14778785221142865&partnerID=40&md5=d32410db598cc14a61c56937088f5f97

Tóm tắt

A great deal of recent scholarship on economically disadvantaged students and higher education works under the foundational assumption that going to college can and/or should serve the goal of economic mobility. This article considers a cost of using higher education for this purpose – specifically, the impact on the decision-making of poor students. I argue that the narrative of higher education for economic mobility places poor students in a problematically restrictive normative framework as compared with their wealthier peers in which decisions involving the pursuit of future economic goods change from matters of preference into ethical dilemmas. In turn, poor students are forced into a narrow cost–benefit, consequentialist mode of decision-making. This is especially problematic because higher education for many students is a transformative experience – a type of experience which is particularly unsuited to consequentialist reasoning. The solution involves reframing the way in which we think about decision-making in higher education, which is at least partially contingent on increasing social supports to shift the burdens of poverty off individual students. © The Author(s) 2022.

Từ khóa

Decision-making; economic mobility; higher education; liberal education; poverty; vocational education

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen D., Two concepts of education, Education and Equality, pp. 1-26, (2016); Anderson E., Value in Ethics and Economics, (1995); Armstrong E.A., Hamilton L.T., Paying for the Party, (2013); Baker R., The effects of structured transfer pathways in community colleges, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 4, pp. 626-646, (2016); Barnes E., What you can expect when you don’t want to be expecting, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91, 3, pp. 775-786, (2015); Beasley M.A., Opting Out: Losing the Potential of America’s Young Black Elite, (2011); Bennett C., The problem of expressive action, Philosophy, 96, 2, pp. 277-300, (2021); Bettinger E.P., Baker R.B., The effects of student coaching: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student advising, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 1, pp. 3-19, (2014); Brighouse H., On Education, (2006); Brighouse H., Ladd H.F., Loeb S., Et al., Educational Goods: Values, Evidence, and Decision-Making, (2018); Callard A., Liberal education and the possibility of valuational progress, Social Philosophy and Policy, 34, 2, pp. 1-22, (2017); Cappelli P., Will College Pay Off? A Guide to the Most Important Financial Decision You’ll Ever Make, (2015); Card R.F., Consequentialist teleology and the valuation of states of affairs, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 7, pp. 253-265, (2004); Cech E.A., The Trouble with Passion: How Searching for Fulfillment at Work Fosters Inequality, (2021); Chetty R., Friedman J.N., Hendren N., Et al., The opportunity atlas: Mapping the childhood roots of social mobility, (2018); Chetty R., Friedman J.N., Saez E., Et al., Mobility report cards: The role of colleges in intergenerational mobility, (2017); Cottom T.M., Lower Ed: The Troubling Rise of For-Profit Colleges in the New Economy, (2017); Davies S., Guppy N., Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education, Social Forces, 75, 4, pp. 1417-1438, (1997); Dewey J., Democracy and Education, (1997); Frank J., Being a Presence for Students: Teaching as a Lived Defense of Liberal Education, (2019); Goldrick-Rab S., Paying the Price: College Costs, Financial Aid, and the Betrayal of the American Dream, (2016); Goyette K.A., Mullen A.L., Who studies the arts and sciences? Social background and the choice and consequences of undergraduate field of study, The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 3, pp. 497-538, (2006); Greenaway J., Human Dignity, Education, and Political Society: A Philosophical Defense of the Liberal Arts, (2020); Groeger C.V., The Education Trap: Schools and the Remaking of Inequality in Boston, (2021); Hacker J.S., The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream, (2019); Hirsch F., Social Limits to Growth, (1976); Jack A.A., The Privileged Poor: How Elite Colleges Are Failing Disadvantaged Students, (2019); Kendall N., Goerisch D., Kim E.C., Et al., The True Costs of College, (2020); Kirp D., The College Dropout Scandal, (2019); Klein J., The idea of liberal education, Jacob Klein Lectures and Essays, pp. 157-170, (1985); Kozol J., Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools, (2012); Ma Y., Family socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and college major choices – gender, race/ethnic, and nativity patterns, Sociological Perspectives, 52, 2, pp. 211-234, (2009); Mangan K., New Carnegie classification will reflect social and economic mobility, The Chronicle of Higher Education, (2022); Michaels W., Dude, where’s my job?, PMLA, 127, 4, pp. 1006-1009, (2012); Morton J., Moving Up without Losing Your Way: The Ethical Costs of Upward Mobility, (2019); Mullen A.L., Gender, social background, and the choice of college major in a liberal arts context, Gender and Society, 28, 2, pp. 289-312, (2014); Murphy L., Social Mobility Elevators: An Analysis of Low-income Student Enrollment and Outcomes at Four-year Colleges and Universities, (2020); Nussbaum M., Cultivating Humanity, (1997); Paul L.A., Transformative Experience, (2014); Paul L.A., Quiggin J., Transformative education, Educational Theory, 70, 5, pp. 561-579, (2020); Reardon S.F., Weathers E.S., Fahle E.M., Et al., Is separate still unequal? New evidence on school segregation and racial academic achievement gaps, (2019); Ryan J.E., Five Miles Away, a World Apart: One City, Two Schools, and the Story of Educational Opportunity in Modern America, (2010); Saks R.E., Shore S.H., Risk and career choice, The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 5, 1, pp. 1-43, (2005); Salamon L.M., The marketization of welfare: Changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state, Social Service Review, 67, 1, pp. 16-39, (1993); Sennett R., Cobb J., The Hidden Injuries of Class, (1973); Sperling G., Economic Dignity, (2020); Sturgeon N.L., Anderson on reason and value, Ethics, 106, 3, pp. 509-524, (1996); Tamborini C.R., Kim C.H., Sakamoto A., Education and lifetime earnings in the United States, Demography, 52, pp. 1383-1407, (2015); Tough P., The Years That Matter Most, (2019); Trejo S., An econometric analysis of the major choice of first-generation college students, The Developing Economist, 3, 1, pp. 1-2, (2016); Williams J., The pedagogy of debt, College Literature, 33, 4, pp. 155-169, (2006); Zaloom C., Indebted: How Families Make College Work at Any Cost, (2019)

Nơi xuất bản

SAGE Publications Ltd

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus