CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Climate resilience planning and organizational learning on campuses and beyond: A comparative study of three higher education institutions
Tác giả
Washington-Ottombre C.; Brylinsky S.E.; Carlberg D.B.; Weisbord D.
Năm xuất bản
2018
Source title
University Initiatives in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-89590-1_5
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Higher education institutions around the world are confronting challenges associated with climate change, and many are trying to model practices that support climate change mitigation and resilience. This work initiates an inventory of good practices and introduces a theoretical framework for the assessment of resilience planning in order to guide and support institutions of higher education in their efforts to plan for resilience. We analyzed the resilience planning initiatives of three higher education institutions. Smith College, a small liberal arts college, conducted participatory research to help plan for climate change. Large, research-focused Cornell University nurtured collaborations and examined its own capacity for climate action. Boston University played an important role in the efforts of the Boston Green Ribbon Commission to plan for climate resiliency in the city of Boston. We analyzed the climate change mitigation and resilience planning processes of these three institutions using a theoretical framework of organizational change, resilience thinking, and adaptive co-management. Our analysis showed that, although each institution approached the process differently, all three gained significant benefits beyond the scope of climate action. Each experienced a meaningful opportunity to engage with its community and explore the values of stakeholders, and each fostered local social capital and action while building a strong consensus on directions for the future. Aspects of the process supported the institutions' missions of education, research, and outreach and provided opportunities to pause and think deeply about how the institution chooses to engage with the world. All three organizations learned valuable lessons and experienced transformation, but Boston University in particular developed new ways to promote institutional learning on the topic of climate change, a process we describe as triple-loop learning. © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019. All rights reserved.
Từ khóa
Campus sustainability; Climate change; Higher education institutions; Organizational learning; Resilience
Tài liệu tham khảo
Armitage D.R., Et al., Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 2, pp. 95-102, (2009); Arroyo P., A new taxonomy for examining the multi-role of campus sustainability assessments in organizational change, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp. 1763-1774, (2017); Bank A., Bobrow S., Bigalke S., Davis A., Edwards H., Geverlber Hewitt E., Et al., Report on the study group on climate change participatory workshop, Retrieved July, 25, (2016); Brown J., Isaacs D., The world cafe, (2005); Brylinsky S., Assessing capacity for and climate change collaborations between the campus and community partners: An organizational needs assessment framework, (2017); Chase L., Imagining utopia: Landscape design at Smith College, 1871-1910, The New England Quarterly, 65, 4, pp. 560-586, (1992); Options report 2017, (2017); Disterheft A., Et al., Sustainability science and education for sustainable development in universities: A way for transition, Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions mapping trends and good practices around the word, pp. 3-28, (2013); Dyer G., Dyer M., Strategic leadership for sustainability by higher education: The American College & University President's Climate Commitment, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1, pp. 111-116, (2017); ArcGIS desktop: Release 10, (2011); Folke C., Colding J., Berkes F., Building resilience for adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems, (2002); Forester J., The deliberative practitioner, encouraging participatory planning processes, (1999); Grundmann R., Climate change as a wicked social problem, Nature Geoscience, 16, pp. 562-563, (2016); Helferty A., Clarke A., Student-led campus climate change initiatives in Canada, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10, 3, pp. 287-300, (2009); Horton R., Et al., Climate change impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment (J, (2014); Kirshen P., Et al., Climate change and coastal flooding in Metro Boston: Impacts and adaptation strategies, Climatic Change, 90, 4, pp. 453-473, (2008); Lauder A., Sari R.F., Suwartha N., Tjahjono G., Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: GreenMetric, Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, pp. 852-863, (2015); Lozano R., Ceulemans K., Alonso-Almeida M., Huisingh D., Lozano F.J., Waas T., A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: Results for a worldwide survey, Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, pp. 1-18, (2015); Malczewski J., GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20, 7, pp. 703-726, (2006); Nyberg B., An introductory guide to adaptive management: For project leaders and participants, (1999); Ostrom E., A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 39, pp. 15181-15187, (2007); Pawlowsky P., The treatment of organizational learning in management science, Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge, pp. 61-88, (2001); Rittel H.W.J., Webber M.M., Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sciences, 4, pp. 155-169, (1973); Higher education's role in adapting to a changing climate, Retrieved July, 7, (2017); Report of the Smith College study group on climate change: Towards a sustainable future, Retrieved July, 25, (2017); Lives of distinction and purpose: A plan for Smith, Retrieved July, 25, (2017); The road to carbon neutrality by 2030, Retrieved July, 5, (2015); Urbanski M., Leal Filho W., Measuring sustainability at universities by means of the sustainability tracking, assessment, and rating system (STARS): Early findings from STARS data, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17, pp. 209-220, (2015); Van Dyne S., Abracadabra": Intimate inventions by early college women in the United States, Feminist Studies, 42, 2, pp. 280-310, (2016); Walker B., Salt D., Resilience in practice: Capacity building to absorb disturbance and maintain function (p, (2012); Washington-Ottombre C., Bigalke S., An aggregated and dynamic analysis of innovations in campus sustainability, (2017)
Nơi xuất bản
Springer International Publishing
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus