Logistics of Mathematical Modeling-Focused Projects
Harwood R.C.
2018
PRIMUS
5
10.1080/10511970.2016.1277813
This article addresses the logistics of implementing projects in an undergraduate mathematics class and is intended both for new instructors and for instructors who have had negative experiences implementing projects in the past. Project implementation is given for both lower- and upper-division mathematics courses with an emphasis on mathematical modeling and data collection. Projects provide tangible connections to course content, which can motivate students to learn at a deeper level. Logistical pitfalls and insights are highlighted, as well as descriptions of several key implementation resources. Effective assessment tools, which allowed a smooth adjustment to student feedback, are demonstrated for a sample class. As I smoothed the transition into each project and guided students through the use of the technology, their negative feedback on projects decreased and more students noted how the projects had enhanced their understanding of the course topics. Best practices learned over the years are given, along with project summaries and sample topics. These projects were implemented at a small liberal arts university, but advice is given to extend them to larger classes for broader use. © 2018, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Logistics; modeling; project-based learning; projects
Ambrose S., Bridges M., Lovett M., DiPietro M., Normann M., How Learning Works: 7 Research-based Principles for Smart Teaching, (2010); Aris R., Mathematical Modelling Techniques, (1994); Bliss K., Fowler K., Galluzzo B., Math Modeling: Getting Started and Getting Solutions, (2014); Claus-McGahan E., Modeling projects in a differential equations course, PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 8, 2, pp. 137-149, (2007); Cline K., Numerical methods through open-ended projects, PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 15, 3, pp. 274-288, (2007); Epstein J., The calculus concept inventory: Measurement of the effect of teaching methodology in mathematics, Notices of the AMS, 60, 8, pp. 1018-1027, (2013); Hestenes D., Wells M., Swackhamer G., Force concept inventory, The Physics Teacher, 30, pp. 141-158, (1992); Kaplan D., Crisman K., Horton N., Marland E., Pruim R.; Karaali G., An evaluative calculus project: Applying Bloom’s taxonomy to the calculus classroom, PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 21, 8, pp. 719-731, (2011); Linhart J., Teaching writing and communication in a mathematical modeling course, PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 24, 7, pp. 594-607, (2014); Mergendoller J., Maxwell N., The effectiveness of problem-based instruction: A comparative study of instructional methods and student characteristics, The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1, 2, pp. 49-69, (2006); Mooney D., Swift R., A Course in Mathematical Modeling, (1999); (2009); Olson J., Cooper S., Lougheed T., Influences of teaching approaches and class size on undergraduate mathematical learning, PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 21, 8, pp. 732-751, (2011); Toews C., Mathematical modeling in the undergraduate curriculum, PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 22, 7, pp. 545-563, (2012); Winkel B., Parameter estimates in differential equation models for chemical kinetics, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42, 1, pp. 37-51, (2010); Winkel B.
Taylor and Francis Inc.
Article
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Scopus