CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Curriculum, culture and ideology
Tác giả
Musgrove F.
Năm xuất bản
2018
Source title
New Directions in Curriculum Studies
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.4324/9780429453953-8
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
The culture which is hegemonic is in fact the gentry culture; and the key to the curriculum of English schools and universities over the past four centuries-since the much-debated rise of the gentry in the late sixteenth century-is the process of gentrification. It is the gentry culture, and neither middle class nor bourgeois culture, which has maintained its hegemony through the ideology of liberal education. School culture it is said is middle-class culture. Middle-class culture is hegemonic. There is no mention of social class: Cultural differences are examined principally in terms of 'the conflict of cultures between old and young and the school's culture is expressed mainly in ceremonies. The curriculum maintains, reproduces or replicates the power structure of society either because its cultural discontinuities prevent working-class children from learning, or because its ideological potency. Hegemony, ideology and legitimacy are closely connected ideas in contemporary analyses of the school curriculum. © 1979 Philip H. Taylor.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Gintis H., Toward a political economy of education: A radical cntlque of Ivan Illich’s Deschooling Society, Harvard Educational Review, 42, (1972); Bowles S., Grntis H., Schooling in Capitalist America, (1976); Jencks C., Smith M., Acland H., Bane M.J., Cohen D., Grntis H., Heyns B., Michelson S., Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America, (1975); Goldthorpe J.H., Et al., The Affluent Worker: Industrial Attitudes and Behaviour, (1968); Brake M., The Skinheads: An English Working Class Subculture. Youth and Society, 6, (1974); Hall S., Efferson T., Resistance through Rituals, pp. 9-79, (1976); Sugarman B., Involvement in youth culture, academic achievement and conformity in school, British Journal of Sociology, 28, (1967); Bernstein B., Education cannot compensate for society, New Society, (1970); Hargreaves D.H., Social Relations in a Secondary School, (1967); Lacey C., Hightown Grammar, (1970); Larov W., The logic of non-standard English, Tinker, Tailor the Myth of Cultural Deprivation, (1973); Leacock E., Abstract versus concrete speech: A false dichotomy, Worlds Apart, (1976); Gladwin T., Navigation and logic on Puluwat Atoll, Worlds Apart; Quine W.G., Polarized cultures in comprehensive schools, Research in Education, 12, (1974); Rosser E., Harre R., The meaning of trouble, The Process of Schooling, (1976); Willis P., The class significance of school counter culture, The Process of Schooling; Birksted I.K., School versus pop culture? A case study of adolescent adaptation, Research in Education, 16, (1976); Birksted I.K., School performance viewed from the boys, Sociological Review, 24, (1976); Waite J., Wwte P., Slogan for crypto-elitists, The Times Educational Supplement, (1973); Williams R., Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory, New Left Review, (1973); Punca M., The sociology of the anti-institution, British Journal of Sociology, 25, (1974); Trilling L., Beyond Culture, (1966); Wwtmarsh G., The politics of political education: An episode, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 6, (1974); Waite J., The end of the compulsory curriculum, The Curriculum: The Doris Lee Lectures; Kearney H., Scholars and Gentlemen, pp. 19-22, (1970); Williams R., The Long Revolution, (1965); Young M.F.D., An approach to the study of curricula as socially organized knowledge, Knowledge and Control, (1971); Kelsall R.K., Poole A., Kuhn A., Graduates: The Sociology of an Elite, (1974); Goldthorpe J.H., Llewellyn C., Class mobility: Intergenerational and worklife patterns, British Journal of Sociology, 28, (1977); Holly D., The invisible ruling class, Education Or Domination, (1974); Tawney R.H., The rise of the gentry 1558-1640, Economic History Review, 11, (1941); Stone L., The Crisis of the Aristocracy 1558-1641, (1965); Wilson C., Economy and society in late Victorian Britain, Economic History Review, 18, (1965); Spring D., English landed society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Economic History Review, 17, (1964); Thompson F.M.L., English Landed Society in the Nineteenth Century, pp. 330-333, (1963); Raven S., Perish by the sword, Encounter, 12, (1959); Harries Enkins G., The Army in Victorian Society, (1977); Itzkowitz D.C., Peculiar Privilege: A Social History of English Foxhunting 1753-1885, (1977); Compton J.M., Open competition and the Indian Civil Service, 1854-1876, English Historical Review, 83, (1968); Woodruff P., The Men Ulho Rule India, The Guardians, pp. 180-181, (1954); Heritage A., Public Schools as Presented by Clarendon and Taunton Commissions and by Contemporary, (1977); Musgrove F., Middle-class education and employment in the nineteenth century, Economic History Review, 14, (1961); Shils E., The intellectuals, Great Britain, Encounter, 4, (1955); Mannheim K., Ideology and Utopia, (1936); Althusser L., For Marx, (1969); Sharp R., Green A., Education and Social Control a Study in Progressive Primary Education, (1975); Inglis F., Ideology and the curriculum: The value assumptions of systems builders, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 6, (1974); Minogue K., Thoughts and circumstances, Times Literary Supplement, (1977); Madoc-Jones B., Social Implications of Elementary Education 1800-1850, (1977); Sanderson M., Education and the factory in industrial Lancashire, 1780-1840, Economic History Review, 20, (1967); Wilkinson P., English youth movements 1908-30, Journal of Contemporary History, 4, (1969); Musgrove F., Marginality, education and the reconstruction of reality, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 8, (1976); Levi-Strauss C., The culinary triangle, New Society, (1966)
Nơi xuất bản
Taylor and Francis
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus