CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

The Flipped Classroom in a Terminal College Mathematics Course for Liberal Arts Students

Tác giả

Carter C.L.; Carter R.L.; Foss A.H.

Năm xuất bản

2018

Source title

AERA Open

Số trích dẫn

12

DOI

10.1177/2332858418759266

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85070282754&doi=10.1177%2f2332858418759266&partnerID=40&md5=0cfbb30466dc86fbd486999600835bdf

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of flipping the classroom on final exam scores in a terminal general education college mathematics course for a diverse student population. We employed a quasiexperimental design. Seven instructors collectively taught 13 sections of each pedagogy (flipped/traditional). Six hundred thirty-two students participated. Common final exams were graded concurrently. Mixed-model analyses were performed. Students in flipped sections scored 5.1 percentage points higher on average than those in traditional sections (p = .02) when controlling for math SAT and financial aid status, an improvement of 7.8 points among Black students (p < .01) and 1.0 points among Whites (p = .67). The estimated average difference between White and Black students, conditional on covariates, was 5.2 percentage points in traditional sections (p < .01) and –1.6 in flipped sections (p = .39). The 6.8-point difference in achievement gap between pedagogies was statistically significant (p < .01). Flipping the classroom was associated with improved student performance, particularly among Black students. © The Author(s) 2018.

Từ khóa

active learning; collaborative learning; complete case analysis; flipping the classroom; linear mixed model; missing data; pedagogy; stereotype threat; video lectures

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abeysekera L., Dawson D., Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research, Higher Education Research and Development, 34, pp. 1-14, (2015); Bidwell A., Flipped classroom may help weaker STEM students, U.S. News & World Report, (2014); Bishop J.L., Verleger M.A., The Flipped Class-Room: A Survey of the Research. Paper Presented at the 120Th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, (2013); Bloom B.S., Krathwohl D.R., Masia B.B., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, (1956); Burger E., Starbird M., The Heart of Mathematics: An Invitation to Effective Thinking., (2008); Cohen J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sci-Ences., (1969); Cordray D.S., Harris T.R., Klein S., A research synthesis of the effectiveness, replicability, and generality of the VaNTH challenge-based instructional modules in bioengineer-ing, Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 4, pp. 335-348, (2009); Day J.A., Foley J.D., Evaluating a Web lecture intervention in a human–computer interaction course, IEEE Transactions on Education, 49, 4, pp. 420-431, (2006); Deci E.L., Ryan R.M., Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, American Psychologist, 55, 1, pp. 68-78, (2000); Eddy S.L., Hogan K.A., Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work?, CBE–Life Sciences Education, 13, pp. 453-468, (2014); Definition of Flipped Learning, (2014); Freeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M., Smith M.K., Okorafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M.P., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111, 23, pp. 8410-8415, (2014); Haak D.C., Hille Ris Lambers J., Pitre E., Freeman S., Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in Introductory Biology, Science, 332, 6034, pp. 1213-1216, (2011); Haukoos G.D., Penick J.E., The influence of classroom climate on science process and content achievement of community college students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 7, pp. 629-637, (1983); Hill C., Bloom H., Black A., Lipsey M., Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research, Child Development Perspectives, 2, pp. 172-177, (2008); Howard J., Hammond R., The hidden obstacles to Black success: Rumors of inferiority, New Republic, 193, 11, pp. 17-21, (1985); The Black–White Test Score Gap, (2011); Kay R., Kletskin I., Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach mathematics in higher education, Computers & Education, 59, pp. 619-627, (2012); Lape N.K., Levy R., Yong D.H., Haushalter K.A., Eddy R., Hankel N., Probing the inverted class-room: A controlled study of teaching and learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering and mathematics, Paper Presented at the 2014 ASEE National Conference Proceedings, (2014); Levin J., Shanken-Kaye J.M., From Disrupter to Achiever: Creating Successful Learning Environments for the Self-Control Classroom, (2002); Logel C.R., Walton G.M., Spencer S.J., Peach J., Mark Z.P., Unleashing latent ability: Implications of stereotype threat for college admissions, Educational Psychologist, 47, 1, pp. 42-50, (2012); Love B., Hodge A., Grandgenett N., Swift A.W., Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45, 3, pp. 317-324, (2014); Martin T., Rivale S.D., Diller K.R., Comparison of student learning in challenge based and traditional instruction in biomedical engineering, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 35, 8, pp. 1312-1323, (2007); McGraw K.O., Wong S.P., A common language effect size statistic, Psychological Bulletin, 111, pp. 361-365, (1992); Nguyen H.H.D., Ryan A.M., Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 6, pp. 1314-1334, (2008); Overmeyer G.R., Effects of Flipping the Classroom in College Algebra (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation)., (2014); Princeton Review, (2016); State University of New York–Buffalo State College, Princeton Review., (2016); SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s Guide, (2009); Springer L., Stanne M.E., Donovan S.S., Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathemat-ics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 69, 1, pp. 21-51, (1999); Steele C.M., A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance, American Psychologist, 52, 6, pp. 613-629, (1997); Steele C.M., Aronson J., Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5, pp. 797-811, (1995); Swan M., Collaborative Learning in Mathematics: A Challenge to Our Beliefs and Practices, (2006); Swain J., Swan M., Thinking through Mathemat-Ics: Research Report, (2007); Walton G.M., Cohen G.L., Stereotype lift, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 5, pp. 456-467, (2003); Wilson S., The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course, Teaching of Psychology, 40, pp. 193-199, (2013); Yong D., Levy R., Lape N., Why no difference? A controlled flipped classroom study for an introductory differential equations course, PRIMUS, 25, 9-10, pp. 907-921, (2015)

Nơi xuất bản

SAGE Publications Inc.

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

All Open Access; Gold Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus