Teaching economics using ‘Cases’ – Going beyond the ‘Chalk-And-Talk’ method
Ray M.
2018
International Review of Economics Education
21
10.1016/j.iree.2017.12.001
This paper describes the adoption of ‘case-method’ teaching technique in two economics elective courses taught by the same instructor in a small liberal arts college. A questionnaire was administered among the students to obtain a qualitative assessment of their learning experiences using this alternative pedagogy. In both the classes, students ranked ‘learning how to use economics to solve real problems’ as the most important aspect of the case-method among the given choices. Furthermore, each of these classes was compared with two other sections taught by the same instructor without cases to perform quantitative assessments. In addition to a pooled OLS regression for each course studying the impact of the ‘case’ on final exam score, a difference in difference analysis was performed to test the difference in test grades before and after the introduction of the case method and between the two classes for each course. Both the methods gave statistically significant results, implying the adoption of the case-method to be effective in making the students active learners. © 2017
Active learning; Alternative pedagogy; Case method; Innovative teaching
Al-Bahrani A., Patel D., Incorporating twitter, instagram, and facebook in economics classrooms, J. Econ. Educ., 46, 1, pp. 56-67, (2015); Astin A.W., Predicting Academic Performance in College, (1971); Carlson J.A., Schodt D.W., Beyond the lecture: case teaching and the learning of economic theory, J. Econ. Educ., 26, Winter, pp. 17-28, (1995); Carlson J.A., Valenchik A., Using the case method in the economics classroom, Teaching Economics: More Alternatives to Chalk and Talk, (2006); Duke J.M., Awokuse T.O., Assessing the effect of bilateral collaborations on learning outcomes, Rev. Agric. Econ., 31, 2, pp. 344-358, (2009); Fels R., This is what i do, and I like it, J. Econ. Educ., 24, 4, pp. 365-370, (1993); Gomez-Ibanez J.A., Kalt J.P., Cases in Microeconomics, (1990); Lavin D.E., The Prediction of Academic Performance, (1963); Marks S.G., Rukstad M.G., Teaching macroeconomics by the case method, J. Econ. Educ., 27, 2, pp. 139-147, (1996); Odell C.W., Predicting the Scholastic Success of College Freshmen, (1927); Orlich D.C., Harder R.J., Callahan R.C., Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Better Instruction, (1994); (2017); Popescu D., Teaching economics – the case method, Annals of the Constantin Brâncu?i, 6, pp. 274-277, (2014); Siegfried J.J., Bartlett R., Hansen W.L., Kelley A.C., McCloskey D.N., Tietenberg T.H., The status and prospects of the economics major, J. Econ. Educ., 22, Summer, pp. 195-224, (1991); Singh P., Russo A., A dream experiment in development economics, J. Econ. Educ., 44, 2, pp. 158-168, (2013); Valenchik A., The case method as a strategy for teaching policy analysis to undergraduates, J. Econ. Educ., 26, 1, pp. 29-38, (1995)
Elsevier Ltd
Article
Scopus