CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
The test-optional movement at America's selective liberal arts colleges: A boon for equity or something else?
Tác giả
Belasco A.S.; Rosinger K.O.; Hearn J.C.
Năm xuất bản
2018
Source title
Measuring Success: Testing, Grades, and the Future of College Admissions
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
[No abstract available]
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abadie A., Semiparametric difference-indifferences estimators, Review of Economic Studies, 72, pp. 1-19, (2005); Alon S., The evolution of class inequality in higher education: Competition, exclusion, and adaptation, American Sociological Review, 74, pp. 731-755, (2009); Alon S., Tienda M., Diversity, opportunity, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education, American Sociological Review, 72, pp. 487-511, (2007); Angrist J., Pischke J., Mostly harmless econometrics, (2009); Atkinson R.C., Standardized tests and access to American universities, (2001); Atkinson R.C., Geiser S., Reflections on a century of college admissions tests, Educational Researcher, 38, pp. 665-676, (2009); Bastedo M.N., Bowman N.A., College rankings as an interorganizational dependency: Establishing the foundation for strategic and institutional accounts, Research in Higher Education, 52, pp. 3-23, (2011); PowerPoint analysis: SAT submitters and non-submitters, (2004); Belasco A.S., Trivette M.J., Aiming low: Estimating the scope and predictors of postsecondary undermatch, Journal of Higher Education, 86, 2, pp. 233-263, (2015); Bertrand M., Duflo E., Mullainathan S., How much should we trust differences-in- differences estimates?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, pp. 249-275, (2004); Bettinger E.P., Evans B.J., Pope D.G., Improving college performance and retention the easy way: Unpacking the ACT exam, No. w17119, (2011); Blau J.R., Moller S., Jones L.V., Why test? Talent loss and enrollment loss, Social Science Research, 33, pp. 409-434, (2004); Bourdieu P., The field of cultural production, (1993); Bourdieu P., The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power, (1996); Bourdieu P., Wacquant L.J.D., An invitation to reflexive sociology, (1992); Buchmann C., Condron D.J., Roscigno V.J., Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment, Social Forces, 89, pp. 435-461, (2010); Camara W.J., Schmidt A.E., Group differences in standardized testing and social stratification, (1999); Annual survey of colleges 1990-2010, (2011); Cortes C.M., Profile in action: Linking admission and retention, New Directions for Higher Education, 2013, 161, pp. 59-69, (2013); Crouse J., Trusheim D., The case against the SAT, (1988); Diver C.S., Skip the test, betray the cause, New York Times, (2006); Dynarksi S., The new merit aid, College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it, pp. 63-100, (2004); Ehrenberg R., Reaching for the brass ring: The U.S. News & World Report rankings and competition, Review of Higher Education, 26, pp. 145-162, (2002); Epstein J., Behind the SAT optional movement: Context and controversy, Journal of College Admission, pp. 9-19, (2009); Espenshade T.J., Chung C.Y., Diversity outcomes of test-optional policies, SAT wars: The case for test-optional admissions, pp. 177-200, (2011); Espenshade T.J., Radford A.W., No longer separate not yet equal: Race and class in elite college admission and campus life, (2009); Test score optional list, (2013); Fischer C.S., Hout M., Jankowski M.S., Lucas S.R., Swidler A., Voss K., Inequality by design, (1996); Freedle R.O., Correcting the SAT's ethnic and social-class bias: A method for reestimating SAT scores, Harvard Educational Review, 73, pp. 1-43, (2003); Fuller A., Median SAT scores can get murky, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2012); Gambino M., Document deep dive: What was on the first SAT?, Smithsonian Magazine, (2013); Geiser S., Studley W.R., UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California, Educational Assessment, 8, pp. 1-26, (2002); Gelman A., Hill J., Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models, (2006); Grodsky E., Warren J.R., Felts E., Testing and social stratification in American education, Annual Review of Sociology, 34, pp. 385-404, (2008); Gumport P.J., Iannozzi M., Shaman S., Zemsky R., The United States country report: Trends in higher education from massification to post-massification, (1997); Hill C.B., Winston G.C., Low-income students and highly selective private colleges: Geography, searching, and recruiting, Economics of Education Review, 29, pp. 495-503, (2010); Hoffman J.L., Lowitzki K.E., Predicting college success with high school grades and test scores: Limitations for minority students, Review of Higher Education, 28, pp. 455-474, (2005); Hoover E., Colleges explore shades of gray in making entrance tests optional, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2010); Hoover E., Claremont McKenna official resigns after falsely reporting SAT scores, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2012); Hoover E., Inflated SAT scores reveal "elasticity of admissions data, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2012); Hoxby C.M., Avery C., The missing "one-offs": The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students, No. w18586, (2012); Iatarola P., Conger D., Long M.C., Determinants of high schools' advanced course offerings, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, pp. 340-359, (2011); Jarque C.M., Bera A.K., A test for normality of observations and regression residuals, International Statistical Review, 55, pp. 163-172, (1987); Jaschik S., Momentum for going SAT optional, Insider Higher Ed, (2006); Jencks C., Riesman D., The academic revolution, (1968); Karabel J., Status group struggle, organizational interests, and limits of institutional autonomy, Theory and Society, 13, pp. 1-40, (1984); Katz J., Epilogue: The admissions process-Society's stake and the individual's interest, Hurdles: The admission dilemma in American higher education, pp. 318-347, (1978); Klugman J., How resource inequalities among high schools reproduce class advantages in college destinations, Research in Higher Education, 53, pp. 803-830, (2012); Klugman J., The advanced placement arms race and the reproduction of educational inequality, Teachers College Record, 115, pp. 1-34, (2013); Kobrin J.L., Patterson B.F., Barbuti S.M., Mattern K.D., Shaw E.J., Validity of the SAT for predicting first-year college grade point average, (2008); Lemann N., The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy, (1999); Lewin T., Testing, testing: Most students are taking both the ACT and SAT, The New York Times, (2013); McDermott A., Surviving without the SAT, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2008); Meredith M., Why do universities compete in the rankings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the U.S. News & World Report college rankings, Research in Higher Education, 45, pp. 443-461, (2004); Merton R.K., The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action, American Sociological Review, 1, pp. 894-904, (1936); Merton R.K., Social theory and social structure, (1957); Park J.J., It takes a village (or an ethnic economy): The varying roles of socioeconomic status, religion, and social capital in SAT preparation for Chinese and Korean American students, American Educational Research Journal, 49, pp. 624-650, (2012); Perna L.W., May H., Yee A., Ransom T., Rodriguez A., Fester R., Unequal access to rigorous high school curricula: An exploration of the opportunity to benefit from the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IBDP), Educational Policy, (2013); Posselt J.R., Jaquette O., Bielby R., Bastedo M.N., Access without equity: Longitudinal analyses of institutional stratification by race and ethnicity, 1972- 2004, American Educational Research Journal, 49, pp. 1074-1111, (2012); Robinson M., Monks J., Making SAT scores optional in selective college admissions: A case study, Economics of Education Review, 24, pp. 393-405, (2005); Rothstein J.M., College performance predictions and the SAT, Journal of Econometrics, 121, pp. 297-317, (2004); Royston P., Estimating departure from normality, Statistics in Medicine, 10, pp. 1283-1293, (1991); Sackett P.R., Kuncel N.R., Arneson J.J., Waters S.D., Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and postsecondary academic performance?, Psychological Bulletin, 135, pp. 1-22, (2009); Sackett P.R., Kuncel N.R., Beatty A.S., Rigdon J.L., Shen W., Kiger T.B., The role of socioeconomic status in SAT-grade relationships and in college admissions decisions, Psychological Science, 23, pp. 1000-1007, (2012); Shaw E.J., Kobrin J.L., Patterson B.F., Mattern K.D., The validity of the SAT for predicting cumulative grade point average by college major, (2012); Smith J., Pender M., Howell J., The full extent of student-college academic undermatch, Economics of Education Review, 32, pp. 247-261, (2013); Stevens M.L., Creating a class: College admissions and the education of elites, (2007); Supiano B., Emory U. intentionally misreported admissions data, investigation finds, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2012); Thacker L., College unranked: Ending the college admissions frenzy, (2005); Vigdor J.L., Clotfelter C.T., Retaking the SAT, Journal of Human Resources, 38, pp. 1-33, (2003); Webster T.J., A principle component analysis of the U.S. News & World Report tier rankings of colleges and universities, Economics of Education Review, 20, pp. 235-244, (2001); White H., Using least squares to approximate unknown regression functions, International Economic Review, 21, pp. 149-170, (1980); Yablon M., Test flight: The scam behind SAT bashing, New Republic, 30, pp. 24-25, (2001)
Nơi xuất bản
Johns Hopkins University Press
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus