CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
The Constrained Liberty of the Liberal Arts and Rhetorical Education
Tác giả
Barouch T.; Ommen B.
Năm xuất bản
2017
Source title
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2016.1242767
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Rhetorical studies has long worried about its identity as a critical discipline and a practical art. Since the Great Recession of 2008, a myriad of social and political forces has provoked a discourse about the vitality of the liberal arts, which brings this identity crisis to the fore. Defenders of the liberal arts have deployed a negative critical stance, positing the liberal arts as external to liberalism as a public culture. This stance limits criticism’s political potential because it ignores the productive role of liberal cultural constraints in forming social bonds and creating self-understandings. As the liberal arts grapple with an evolving liberty to learn, so too might the rhetorical arts commit to the productive possibilities of simulation and judgment. This path would respond to the needs of students, who find themselves between structural constraints and contingent possibilities for change. © 2017 The Rhetoric Society of America.
Từ khóa
criticism; invention; judgment; liberalism; pedagogy
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arendt H., The Human Condition; Asen R., Critical Engagement Through Public Sphere Scholarship, Quarterly Journal of Speech, pp. 132-144, (2015); Berlin I., From Hope and Fear Set Free, Concepts and Categories: Philosophical Essays, pp. 196-222, (1999); Black E., Rhetorical Criticism: A Study in Method, (1965); Blegen T.C., The Prospect for the Liberal Arts, Quarterly Journal of Speech, pp. 388-392, (1954); Burke K., The Grammar of Motives.Berkeley: California, 1969. Print.; Burke K., The Philosophy of Literary Form; Condit C., “Profile.” Web. 7 Nov. 2016.; Conley T.M., Ancient Rhetoric and Modern Genre Criticism, Communication Quarterly, pp. 47-53, (1979); Robert C.W., “Do Majors Matter?” Inside Higher Ed, 16 June 2011. Web. 25 May, (2012); Cooper M.M., Rhetorical Agency as Emergent and Enacted, College Composition and Communication, pp. 420-449, (2011); Dewey J., The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry, (1988); Ehninger D., Argument as Method: Its Nature, Its Limitations, and Its Uses, Communication Monographs, pp. 101-110, (1970); Emerson R.W., From The American Scholar, The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, pp. 721-724, (2011); Enck S.M., Feminist Communication Activism Pedagogy, Teaching Communication Activism: Communication Education for Social Justice, pp. 199-230, (2014); Enck S.M., McDaniel B.A., ‘I Want Something Better for My Life’: Personal Narratives of Incarcerated Women and Performances of Agency, Text and Performance Quarterly, 35, pp. 43-61, (2015); Everett D.L., The Broccoli of Higher, Inside Higher Ed, 30 Aug. 2011. Web. 25 May 2012; Segal F., Carolyn. “Chiseling Away at the Humanities: Don’t Like to Read? Aww, Tough!, The Chronicle of Higher Education, (2012); Frey L.R., Palmer D.L., Teaching Communication Activism, Teaching Communication Activism: Communication Education for Social Justice, pp. 199-230, (2014); Grasso L.M., Academically on Course, 2 Sept. 2011. Web. 25 May 2012; Hariman R., Status, Marginality, and Rhetorical Theory, Quarterly Journal of Speech, pp. 38-54, (1986); Johanna H.E., Revisiting Vico’s Pedagogy of Invention: The Intellectual Enterpreneurship Pre-Graduate School Internship, Quarterly Journal of Speech, pp. 152-177, (2012); Hartnett S.J., Comunication, Social Justice, and Joyful Commitment, Western Journal of Communication, pp. 68-93, (2010); Hirschman A.O., Social Conflicts as Pillars of Democratic Market Society, Political Theory, pp. 203-218, (1994); Jamieson K.M., Antecedent Genre as Rhetorical Constraint, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, pp. 406-415, (1975); Jasinski J., The Status of Theory and Method in Rhetorical Criticism, Western Journal of Communication, pp. 249-270, (2001); Johnstone H.W., Some Reflections on Argumentation, Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Argumentation, pp. 1-9, (1965); Kimball B.A., Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. Exp. Ed, (1995); Lippmann W., Public Opinion.New York: Free Press, 1965. Print.; Lundberg C.O., Lacan in Public: Psychoanalysis and the Science of Rhetoric, (2012); Lundberg C.O., Gunn J., Ouija Board, Are There Any Communications? Agency, Ontotheology, and the Death of the Humanist Subject, or, Continuing the ARS Conversation, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, pp. 83-105, (2005); Matheson C., Procedural Rhetoric Beyond Persuasion: First Strike and the Compulsion to Repeat, Games and Culture, pp. 1-18, (2014); McConnell K.F., Imbalances and Inequities: The Structure of Inquiry and Its Place in Rhetorical Studies, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, pp. 47-64, (2015); Miller C.R., What Can Automation Tell Us About Agency?, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, pp. 137-157, (2007); Nussbaum M.C., The Liberal Arts Are Not Elitist, The Chronicle of Higher Education, (2012); Guterl P., Matthew. “The Humanities Matter More.” Inside Higher Ed, 30 June 2011. Web. 3 Apr, (2015); QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking. Web. 9 Sept, (2015); Ricoeur P., Study 1 /Between Rhetoric and Poetics: Aristotle, The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language; Todorov T., The Splendor and Misery of Rhetoric.” Theories of the Symbol. Trans. Catherine Porter, (1982); Trilling L., The Liberal Imagination. Intro. Louis Menand, (2008); Ungar S.J., 7 Major Misperceptions About the Liberal Arts.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. 28 Feb. 2010. Web. 25 May, (2012); Walzer M., Miller D., The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism, Thinking Politically: Essays in Political Theory, pp. 96-114, (2007); White J.B., The Judicial Opinion and the Poem: Ways of Reading, Ways of Life, Michigan Law Review, 82, pp. 1669-1699, (1984); Williams R., Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, (1983); Wrage E.J., Public Address: A Study in Social and Intellectual History, Quarterly Journal of Speech, pp. 451-457, (1947); Zarefsky D., What Does an Argument Culture Look Like?, Informal Logic, pp. 296-308, (2008)
Nơi xuất bản
Routledge
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus