CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Rawlsian Education: Preliminary Observations
Tác giả
Podschwadek F.
Năm xuất bản
2022
Source title
Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-84021-1_2
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This chapter provides an analysis of the aspects of John Rawls’ political philosophy that are relevant for questions of education. It starts with giving an overview of the sparse occasions where Rawls himself writes about the relevance of these concepts for liberal education and then discusses the three major claims about education that can be found there: the idea of political liberal minimal civic education and its aims, the development of a sense of justice as political virtue, and education as a political institution to which the requirements of public reason apply. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Từ khóa
Civic education; John Rawls; Liberalism; Political virtues; Public reason
Tài liệu tham khảo
Archard D., Children: Rights and Childhood, (2004); Arneson R.J., Shapiro I., Democratic Autonomy and Religious Freedom: A Critique of Wisconsin V, 38, pp. 365-411, (1996); Atance C.M., Belanger M., Meltzoff A.N., Preschoolers’ Understanding of Others’ Desires: Fulfilling Mine Enhances My Understanding of Yours, Developmental Psychology, 46, 6, pp. 1505-1513, (2010); Breyer H.J., Cinderella, The Horse God and the Wizard of Oz: Mozert v, Hawkins County Public Schools. Journal of Law and Education, 20, 1, pp. 63-93, (1991); Harry B., On Education. London, (2006); Burtt S., Religious Parents, Secular Schools: A Liberal Defense of an Illiberal Education, The Review of Politics, 56, 1, pp. 51-70, (1994); Defense of Yoder: Parental Authority and the Public Schools, 38, pp. 412-437, (1996); Colburn B., Forbidden Ways of Life, The Philosophical Quarterly, 58, 233, pp. 618-629, (2008); Degroff E.A., Parental Rights and Public School Curricula: Revisiting Mozert After 20 Years, Journal of Law and Education, 38, pp. 1-82, (2009); Eisgruber C.L., How Do Liberal Democracies Teach Values?, Moral and Political Education, pp. 58-86, (2002); Freeman S.R., Rawls, (2007); Gaus G.F., Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political: How the Weaknesses of John Rawls’s Political Liberalism Can Be Overcome by a Justificatory Liberalism, Inquiry, 42, 2, pp. 259-284, (1999); Democratic Education, (1999); Civic Minimalism, Cosmopolitanism, and Patriotism: Where does Democratic Education Stand in Relation to Each?, Moral and Political Education, pp. 23-57, (2002); Identity in Democracy, (2003); Thomas H., Perfectionism, (1996); Kessel A., Moving Beyond Mozert: Toward a Democratic Theory of Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47, 13-14, pp. 1419-1434, (2015); Kasper L.-R., Rawls and Luck Egalitarianism, pp. 133-147, (2020); Macedo S., Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls?, Ethics, 105, 3, pp. 468-496, (1995); Merry M.S., Educational Justice: Liberal Ideals, Persistent Inequality, And the Constructive Uses of Critique, (2020); Michael M.M., Free Exercise of Religion Within the Public School: Mozert v. Hawkins County Board of Education, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 3, 3, pp. 469-500, (1987); Nussbaum M.C., Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education, (2003); Ramsay M., Political Liberalism and Moral Education: Reflections on Mozert v. Hawkins, Taking Responsibility for Children, pp. 113-138, (2007); Rawls J., Distributive Justice: Some Addenda, pp. 154-175, (1999); The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good, pp. 449-472, (1999); The Sense of Justice, pp. 96-116, (1999); Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, (2001); The Idea of Public Reason Revisited, The Law of Peoples, pp. 129-180, (2002); 2005A. a Theory of Justice; Political Liberalism, (2005); Raz J., The Morality of Freedom, (2009); Reich R., Testing the Boundaries of Parental Authority over Education: The Case of Homeschooling, Moral and Political Education, pp. 275-313, (2002); Richardson H.S., Rawlsian Social-Contract Theory and the Severely Disabled, The Journal of Ethics, 10, 4, pp. 419-462, (2006); Sher G., Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics, (1997); Tomasi J., Civic Education and Ethical Subservience: From Mozert to Santa Fe and Beyond, Moral and Political Education, pp. 193-220, (2002); Mozert v, Hawkins County Public Schools, (1986); Supreme Court U.S., Wisconsin v, Yoder, (1972); Mozert v, Hawkins County Board of Education, (1987); Vojak C., Mozert v. Hawkins: A Look at Self-Knowledge and the Best Interest of the Child, Educational Theory, 53, 4, pp. 401-419, (2003)
Nơi xuất bản
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus