CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Creative process and experiences leading to creative achievement in the case of accomplished architects
Tác giả
Lee S.-Y.; Lee G.
Năm xuất bản
2017
Source title
Asia Pacific Education Review
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1007/s12564-017-9489-2
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This study has identified factors stimulating creative ideas, transforming creative ideas to products, and continuing creative performance in the field of architecture based on interviews with 10 creative and successful architects. Having a penchant for liberal arts and reading books on a broad range of topics on arts, humanities, social sciences, and engineering were two major sources of creative inspirations for these architects. The interview data showed that creative inspirations occurred with a variety of artistic and cultural experiences outside the field of architecture, while it got blossomed in forms of creative architecture by means of architectural knowledge and skills, commitment with efficient problem solving and interpersonal skills, and great mentors in the field. Constraints imposed on by architectural regulations and other people, including clients, had a positive impact on creative productivity. Despite constant challenges and difficulties, the architects showed psychological strengths and positivity that enabled them to stay and survive in the field. © 2017, Education Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Từ khóa
Architectural creativity; Creative architects; Creative idea; Creative performance
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bonnardel N., Marmeche E., Evocation processes by novice and expert designers: Towards stimulating analogical thinking, Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 3, pp. 176-186, (2004); Caballero R., The role of metaphor in architects’ negotiation and reconstruction of knowledge across genres, Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 1, pp. 3-21, (2013); Casakin H., Davidovitch N., Milgram R.M., Creative thinking as a predictor of creative problem solving in architectural design students, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 1, pp. 31-35, (2010); Christensen B.T., Schunn C.D., The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design, Memory and Cognition, 35, 1, pp. 29-38, (2007); Cramond B., Matthews-Morgan J., Bandalos D., Zuo L., A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium, Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 4, pp. 283-291, (2005); Cropley D., Cropley A., Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity, Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse, pp. 169-185, (2005); Cropley A., Cropley D., Creativity and lawbreaking, Creativity Research Journal, 23, 4, pp. 313-320, (2011); Cropley D.H., Cropley A.J., Chiera B.A., Kaufman J.C., Diagnosing organizational innovation: Measuring the capacity for innovation, Creativity Research Journal, 25, 4, pp. 388-396, (2013); Cubukcu E., Cetintahra G.E., Does analogical reasoning with visual clues affect novice and experienced design students’ creativity?, Creativity Research Journal, 22, 3, pp. 337-344, (2013); de Cruz H., de Smedt J., Science as structured imagination, Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 1, pp. 29-44, (2010); Dudek S.Z., Hall W.B., Personality consistency: Eminent architects 25 years later, Creativity Research Journal, 4, 3, pp. 213-231, (1991); Glaser B., Strauss A., The discovery grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative inquiry, (1967); Hong S., Clients and architect, Architecture and Interior, 48, 6, pp. 20-22, (2004); Kalogerakis K., Luthje C., Herstatt C., Developing innovations based on analogies: Experience from design and engineering consultants, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 3, pp. 418-436, (2010); Kaufman J.C., Creativity 101, (2009); Kerr B., McKay R., Searching for tomorrow’s innovators: Profiling creative adolescents, Creativity Research Journal, 25, 1, pp. 21-32, (2013); Kim I., A study on design creativity and design process model, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 14, 3, pp. 125-132, (1998); Kowaltoswki D.C., Bianchi G., de Paiva V.T., Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 4, pp. 453-476, (2010); Kreitler S., The cognitive guidance of behavior, Perspectivism in social psychology: The Yin and Yang of scientific progress, pp. 113-126, (2004); Kreitler S., Casakin H., Motivation for creativity in design students, Creativity Research Journal, 21, 2-3, pp. 282-293, (2009); MacKinnon D.W., The nature and nurture of creative talent, American Psychologist, 17, 7, pp. 484-495, (1962); MacKinnon D.W., Nielsen G.S., The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects, Proceedings of the XIV international congress of applied psychology, Copenhagen 1961 (Vol. 2, pp. 11-39, (1962); Martens Y., Creative workplace: Instrumental and symbolic support for creativity, Facilities, 29, 1-2, pp. 63-79, (2011); Meneely J., Portillo M., The adaptable mind in design: Relating personality, cognitive style, and creative performance, Creativity Research Journal, 17, 2 and 3, pp. 155-166, (2005); Morton J., O'Brien D., Selling your design: Oral communication pedagogy in design education, Communication Education, 54, 1, pp. 6-19, (2005); Ozkan O., Dogan F., Cognitive strategies of analogical reasoning in design: Differences between expert and novice designers, Design Studies, 34, 1, pp. 161-192, (2012); Piirto J., Understanding those who create, (1998); Plucker J.A., Beghetto R.A., Dow G.T., Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research, Educational Psychologist, 39, pp. 83-96, (2004); Plucker J.A., Qian M., Wang S., Is originality in the eye of the beholder?: Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking, Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 1, pp. 1-22, (2011); Portillo M., Creativity defined: Implicit theories in the professions of interior design, architecture, landscape architecture, and engineering, Journal of Interior Design, 28, 1, pp. 10-26, (2002); Runco M.A., Jaeger G.J., The standard definition of creativity, Creativity Research Journal, 24, 1, pp. 92-96, (2012); Sarkar P., Chakrabarti A., Assessing design creativity, Design Studies, 32, 4, pp. 348-383, (2011); Solovyova I., Conjecture and emotion: An investigation of the relationship between design thinking and emotional content, Expertise in design: Design thinking research symposium 6, (2003); Strauss A., Corbin J., Basics of qualitative research, (1990); Tae J., A quest on possibility of artistic activity for strengthening creativity of gifted children: Centering on music activity, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 20, 3, pp. 789-807, (2010); Torrance E.P., Mentor relationships: How they aid creative achievement, endure, change, and die, (1984); Torrance E.P., Why fly?: A philosophy of creativity, (1995); Weisberg R.W., Frank Lloyd Wright’s Fallingwater: A case study in inside-the-box creativity, Creativity Research Journal, 23, 4, pp. 296-312, (2011)
Nơi xuất bản
Springer Netherlands
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus