Conversation: The challenges of teaching in a “nano department”
Wagoner B.; Gummer N.; Rein N.; Thompson C.L.; Czander G.; Peterfeso J.; Pryor A.
2017
Teaching Theology and Religion
0
10.1111/teth.12397
A panel at the 2016 American Academy of Religion conference staged, taped, transcribed, and edited this conversation about the challenges and opportunities of teaching in a “nano department” – an undergraduate religion or religious studies department (or combined religion and philosophy department) with only one, two, or three faculty members. Two things quickly become evident: one is the impossibility of coverage of the full religious studies curriculum, and the other is the necessity for collaboration with other departments. Neither of these is unique to nano departments, but there exists an intimacy between students and faculty in small departments, a necessary freedom to rethink the place of the study of religion in the liberal arts curriculum, and a disruptive value in what can be critiqued and contributed from a marginalized position. Arguably, nano departments are the canaries in the academic coal mine, charting the future of the humanities that cannot be discerned from the vantage point of Research-1 contexts. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
flat curriculum; inter-disciplinary; small departments; student learning outcomes; undergraduate liberal arts
1; Guide for reviewing programs in religion & theology. American Academy of Religion, (1999); Bennett J.B., Collegial professionalism: The academy, individualism, and the common good, (1998); Bensimon E.M., Ward K.A., Sanders K., The department chair's role in developing new faculty into teachers and scholars, (2000); Burns C.P., Cognitive dissonance theory and the induced-compliance paradigm: Concerns for teaching religious studies, Teaching Theology and Religion, 9, pp. 3-8, (2006); Cotter C.R., Robertson D.G., After world religions: Reconstructing religious studies, (2016); Davis J.R., Learning to lead: A handbook for postsecondary administrators, (2011); Deffenbaugh D.G., Big questions” in the introductory religion classroom: Expanding the integrative approach, Teaching Theology and Religion, 14, pp. 307-322, (2011); Glennon F., Jacobsen D., Jacobsen R.H., Thatamanil J.J., Porterfield A., Moore M.E., Formation in the classroom, Teaching Theology and Religion, 14, pp. 357-381, (2011); Graff H.J., Undisciplining knowledge: Interdisciplinarity in the twentieth century, (2015); Hangen T., Syllabus, (2011); Irwin J., VCU police academy recruits use art analysis to build critical inquiry skills, (2016); Lucas A.F., Leading academic change: Essential roles for department chairs, (2005); Lyall S., Off the beat and into a museum: Art helps police officers learn to look, (2016); Lyons R.E., Best practices for supporting adjunct faculty, (2007); Medine C.M.J., Penner T., Lehman M., Forum: Teaching with, against, and to faith, Teaching Theology and Religion, 18, pp. 363-386, (2015); Olmstead M.A., Mentoring new faculty: Advice to department chairs, (1993); Plank K.M., Team teaching: Across the disciplines, across the academy, (2011); Ramai D., Goldin S., Humanities in medicine: Preparing for practice, Perspectives on Medical Education, 2, 5-6, pp. 332-334, (2013); Smith J.Z., Imagining religion: From Babylon to Jonestown, (1982); Thompson D.A., As if religion matters: Teaching the introductory course as if it does, Teaching Theology and Religion, 6, pp. 85-92, (2003); Upson-Saia K., The capstone experience for the religious studies major, Teaching Theology and Religion, 16, pp. 3-17, (2013); Walvoord B.E., Teaching and learning in college introductory religion courses, (2008); Wershof Schwartz A., Abramson J.S., Wojnowich I., Accordino R., Ronan E.J., Rifkin M.R., Evaluating the impact of the humanities in medical education, The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 76, pp. 372-380, (2009); Wheeler D.W., The academic chair's handbook, (2008)
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Article
Scopus