CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
A trivium-based heuristic: Reemphasizing listening in the general education curriculum
Tác giả
Sherman D.R.
Năm xuất bản
2017
Source title
Journal of General Education
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0192
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This article argues for classical education’s trivium—grammar, logic, and rhetoric—and its step-by-step building of knowledge as a heuristic for general education courses. Specifically, courses must intertwine the four rhetorical acts of reading, writing, speaking, and listening to achieve a trivium-based heuristic. Current curricula, however, have separated these four rhetorical acts—especially listening—from one another and have left their teaching to competing departments. All general education courses—regardless of department—should combine the rhetorical acts through this trivium-based heuristic to better prepare students for communicating and transferring knowledge. A reorientation toward listening and self-reflective practices as a theoretical basis in general education achieves this trivium-based heuristic and the goals of a liberal arts education. © 2019 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Từ khóa
General education; Liberal arts; Listening; Transfer; Trivium
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aitchison D.C., Decline and renewal in the liberal arts as themes for first-year writing, Journal of General Education, 64, 3, pp. 157-170, (2015); Allport A., Mackay D., Prinz W., Scheerer E., Language Perception and Production: Relationships between Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing, (1987); Anders G., That “useless” liberal arts degree has become tech’s hottest ticket, Forbes, (2015); Anders G., The unexpected value of the liberal arts, Atlantic, (2017); Arbor J., With our ears to the ground: Compassionate listening in Israel/Palestine, Silence and Listening as Rhetorical Acts, pp. 217-230, (2011); What is a Liberal Education?; Atwill J., Rhetoric Reclaimed: Aristotle and the Liberal Arts Tradition, (1998); Baldwin P., Study as love: Augustinian vision and Catholic education, Augustine and Liberal Education, pp. 15-24, (2008); Bauer S., The Well-Educated Mind: A Guide to the Classical Education You Never Had, (2003); Berlin J., Rhetoric and Reality, (1987); Brownell J., The skills of listening–centered communication, Listening and Human Communication in the Twenty-First Century, pp. 141-157, (2010); Chi M.T.H., Vanlehn K.A., Seeing deep structure from the interactions of surface features, Educational Psychologist, 47, 3, pp. 177-188, (2012); Chou T., A leading Silicon Valley engineer explains why every tech worker needs a humanities education, Quartz, (2017); On the Ideal Orator, (2001); Conrad L., Integration and the liberal arts: A historical overview, On the Horizon, 22, 1, pp. 46-56, (2014); Cronon W., “Only connect … ”: The goals of a liberal education, American Scholar, 67, 4, pp. 73-80, (1998); Cutler A., Speaking for listening, Language Perception and Production: Relationships between Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing, pp. 23-40, (1987); Day S.B., Goldstone R.L., The import of knowledge export: Connecting findings and theories of transfer of learning, Educational Psychologist, 47, 3, pp. 153-176, (2012); Eisenstein E., The emergence of print culture in the West, Journal of Communication, 30, 1, pp. 99-106, (1980); Engle R.A., Lam D.P., Meyer X.S., Nix S.E., How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them, Educational Psychologist, 47, 3, pp. 215-231, (2012); Enos R., Greek Rhetoric before Aristotle, (2012); Farrarrev. F.W., Essays on a Liberal Education, (1969); Our Courses. College of Arts and Sciences, (2017); Flowerdew J., Miller L., Second Language Listening: Theory and Practice, (2005); Floyd J.J., Listening: A dialogic perspective, Listening and Human Communication in the Twenty-First Century, pp. 127-140, (2010); Frazier D., First steps beyond first year: Coaching transfer after fyc, Writing Program Administration, 33, 3, pp. 34-57, (2010); Gee J.P., Green J.L., Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study, Review of Research in Education, 23, pp. 119-169, (1998); Goldenberg E.N., Teaching key competencies in liberal arts education, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001, pp. 15-23, (2001); Hanson V.D., Heath J., Who Killed Homer? The Demise of Classical Education and The Recovery of Greek Wisdom, (2001); Helgesen M., Brown S., Active Listening: Introducing Skills for Understanding, (1995); Hinshaw W.W., Making ourselves vulnerable: A feminist pedagogy of listening, Silence and Listening as Rhetorical Acts, pp. 264-277, (2011); Imhof M., What is going on in the mind of a listener? The cognitive psychology of listening, Listening and Human Communication in the Twenty-First Century, pp. 97-126, (2010); Jacobs R.M., Augustine’s Pedagogy of Intellectual Liberation: Turning Students from the “truth of author” to the “authority of truth.”, pp. 111-123, (2008); Jalbert J.E., Leisure and liberal education: A plea for uselessness, Philosophical Studies in Education, 40, pp. 222-233, (2009); Janusik L.A., Listening pedagogy: Where do we go from here?, Listening and Human Communication in the Twenty-First Century, pp. 193-224, (2010); Johnson W., Parker H., Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, (2011); Joseph S.M., The trivium: The liberal arts of logic, grammar, and rhetoric, Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books, (2002); Kennedy G.A., Quintilian: A Roman Educator and His Quest for the Perfect Orator, (2013); Kenyon E., Augustine and the liberal arts, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 12, 1, pp. 105-113, (2012); Kleiman J., Why getting a liberal arts college education is not a mistake, Forbes, (2014); Lang E.M., Distinctively American: The liberal arts college, Daedalus, 128, 1, pp. 133-150, (1999); Lee J.F., Vanpatten B., Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen, (2003); Long C.P., The liberal arts endeavor, Journal of General Education, 65, 3, pp. v-ix, (2016); Lunsford A., Writing curricula: Focus on interrogating values [blog post], Bedford Bits, (2017); Mackay A., Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World [Mnemosyne, Supplements], (2008); Morales E.E., Learning as liberation: How liberal arts education transforms first-generation/low socio-economic college students, Journal of College Student Retention, 13, 4, pp. 499-518, (2012); Murphy J.J., What is rhetoric and what can it do for writers and readers?, The Reading-Writing Connection: Ninety-Seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, pp. 74-87, (1998); Nelson N., Calfee R., The reading-writing connection97th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, (1998); Nemec P.B., Spagnolo A.C., Soydan A.S., Can you hear me now? Teaching listening skills, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 40, 4, pp. 415-417, (2017); Noddings N., Renewing the spirit of the liberal arts, Journal of General Education, 62, 2-3, pp. 77-83, (2013); Nussbaum M.C., Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education, (1997); Parker C.S., On the history of classical education, Essays on a Liberal Education, pp. 1-80, (1969); Perkins D.N., Salomon G., Knowledge to go: A motivational and disposi-tional view of transfer, Educational Psychologist, 47, 3, pp. 248-258, (2012); Institutes of Oratory, (2011); Randall W., Composing a good strong story: The advantages of a liberal arts environment for experiencing and exploring the narrative complexity of human life, Journal of General Education, 61, 3, pp. 277-293, (2012); Ratcliffe K., Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness., (2005); Robinson M., Trivium in Practice, (2016); Rogers C.R., Roethlisberger F.J., Barriers and Gateways to Communication. Harvard Business Review, pp. 105-111, (1991); Rosalind T., Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece., (1992); Rumelhart D.E., Notes on a schema for stories, Representation and Understanding, pp. 211-236, (1975); Ryan M., The pedagogical balancing act: Teaching reflection in higher education, Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 2, pp. 144-155, (2013); Sanfilippo M., The truth about liberal arts degrees, Goodcall, (2017); Schultz K., Listening: A Framework for Teaching across Differences, (2003); Schwartz D.L., Chase C.C., Bransford J.D., Resisting overzealous transfer: Coordinating previously successful routines with needs for new learning, Educational Psychologist, 47, 3, pp. 204-214, (2012); Searle J., The Construction of Social Reality, (1995); Shanahan T., Reading and Writing Together: New Perspectives for the Classroom, (1990); Smith S.B., Political Philosophy, (2012); Smith T., The motives for liberal education, Augustine and Liberal Education, pp. 198-215, (2008); Spiro J., Changing Methodologies in TESOL, (2013); Stenberg S., Cultivating listening: Teaching from a restored logos, Silence and Listening as Rhetorical Acts, pp. 250-263, (2011); Sullivan P., A New Writing Classroom: Listening, Motivation, and Habits of Mind, (2014); Swanson R., Marquardt C., On Communication: Listening, Reading, Speaking, and Writing, (1974); Toulmin S., Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, (1992); Ur P., Teaching Listening Comprehension, (1984); Wardle E., Understanding “transfer” from fyc: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study, Writing Program Administration, 31, 1-2, pp. 65-85, (2007); West A.F., The Seven Liberal Arts. Classical, (2010); Wolvin A.D., Listening in the general education curriculum, International Journal of Listening, 26, 2, pp. 122-128, (2012)
Nơi xuất bản
Penn State University Press
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus