CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Curriculum elements of a politically liberal education in a developing democracy
Tác giả
Çelik R.
Năm xuất bản
2016
Source title
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Số trích dẫn
4
DOI
10.1080/00131857.2016.1160356
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
A previous study has justified the idea that a politically liberal conception of formal education can be applied in a developing democracy if such a society has reached a narrow overlapping consensus on its education system or modifies its education system from a minimally coercive perspective. This study further considers the fundamental question of how to determine such an educational account’s curriculum elements. In this sense, this study aims to provide a perspective on determining some core curriculum elements of a politically liberal conception of formal education, while focusing its attention to developing democracies. © 2016 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia.
Từ khóa
civic education; curriculum; John Rawls; justice; Political liberalism; politically liberal education
Tài liệu tham khảo
Boyum S., Rawls’s notion of the political conception as educator, European Journal of Political Theory, 12, pp. 136-152, (2013); Brighouse H., Justice, (2004); Bull B.L., A politically liberal conception of civic education, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, pp. 449-460, (2008); Bull B.L., A sketch of politically liberal principles of social justice in higher education, Philosophical Studies in Education, 43, pp. 26-38, (2012); Callan E., Political liberalism and political education, The Review of Politics, 58, pp. 5-33, (1996); Callan E., Creating citizens, (1997); Celik R., A politically liberal conception of formal education in a developing democracy, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48, pp. 498-508, (2015); Costa M.V., Rawlsian civic education: Political not minimal, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21, 1, pp. 1-14, (2004); D'Agostino F., Relativism and reflective equilibrium, Monist, 71, pp. 420-436, (1988); Fowler T., The limits of civic education: The divergent implications of political and comprehensive liberalism, Theory and Research in Education, 9, pp. 87-100, (2011); Gonzalez A.M., Kant's philosophy of education: Between relational and systemic approaches, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45, pp. 433-454, (2011); Gutmann A., Civic education and social diversity, Ethics, 105, pp. 557-579, (1995); Johnston J.S., Moral law and moral education: Defending kantian autonomy, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41, pp. 233-245, (2007); Levinson M., Mapping multicultural education, The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education, pp. 428-450, (2009); Macedo S., Liberal civic education and religious fundamentalism: The case of god v. John Rawls?, Ethics, 105, pp. 468-496, (1995); McDonough K., Multinational civic education, Citizenship and education in liberal-democratic societies, pp. 351-382, (2003); Moore M.J., Pluralism, relativism, and liberalism, Political Research Quarterly, 62, pp. 244-256, (2009); Moran K.A., Can Kant have an account of moral education?, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43, pp. 471-484, (2009); Nielsen K., Relativism and wide reflective equilibrium, Monist, 76, pp. 316-332, (1993); Nussbaum M.C., Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities, (2010); Pogge T.W., Is Kant’s rechtslehre comprehensive?, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, XXXVI, pp. 161-187, (1997); Rawls J., Political liberalism, (1993); Rawls J., Justice as fairness: A restatement, (2001); Reidy D., Education for citizenship in a pluralist liberal democracy, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 30, pp. 25-42, (1996); Rostboll C.F., Kantian autonomy and political liberalism, Social Theory and Practice, 37, pp. 341-364, (2011); Strike K.A., Education policy and the just society, (1982); Strike K.A., On the construction of public speech: Pluralism and public reason, Educational Theory, 44, 1, pp. 1-26, (1994); Taylor R.S., Kantian personal autonomy, Political Theory, 33, pp. 602-628, (2005); Wilson E.E., Kantian autonomy and the moral self, The Review of Metaphysics, 62, pp. 355-381, (2008)
Nơi xuất bản
Routledge
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus