CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Application of campus instructional support: two case studies
Tác giả
Clauss-Ehlers C.S.; Pasquerella L.
Năm xuất bản
2017
Source title
International Journal of Information and Learning Technology
Số trích dẫn
2
DOI
10.1108/IJILT-11-2016-0053
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how instructional support is a critical tool to promote the use of technology in research and teaching. A Campus-Wide Collaborative Model of Technological Instructional Support (CCMTIS) is presented that incorporates: integration of technology across campus; technical assistance; allocation of funding for technical assistance; support of faculty teaching style; and teaching that enhances learning through the use of technology. Design/methodology/approach: The approach presents two case studies, one a large state research university, and the other a small liberal arts college. Findings: Four overlapping themes emerge across the two case studies that demonstrate how: technology can connect classroom learning to career considerations and opportunities; develop writing and communication skills; promote career development through access to job search skills; and encourage professional development among faculty and staff. Research limitations/implications: The limitations are that only two specific campus environments are examined. That these are differing environments, however, have implications for the model’s application to diverse campus settings. Practical implications: A practical application is that the study demonstrates how the CCMTIS model can be applied to both classroom and campus. This has implications for other universities that may seek to replicate the model on their own campuses. Social implications: The social implications indicate how learning occurs through an instructional support model that promotes collaboration. At the same time, ethical considerations related to instructional support are presented. Originality/value: The manuscript reflects original work based on case studies that reflect the authors’ experiences. © 2017, © Emerald Publishing Limited.
Từ khóa
Colleges; Educational administration; Innovation
Tài liệu tham khảo
Brandl K., Are you ready to Moodle?, Language, Learning, and Technology, 9, 2, pp. 16-23, (2005); Brooks R., The development of a code of ethics: an online classroom approach to making connections between ethical foundations and the challenges presented by information technology, American Journal of Business Education, 3, 10, pp. 1-13, (2010); Bullock C., Ory J., Evaluating instructional technology implementation in a higher education environment, American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 3, pp. 315-328, (2000); Clauss-Ehlers C.S., Sociocultural factors, resilience, and coping: support for a culturally sensitive measure of resilience, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 3, pp. 197-212, (2008); Clauss-Ehlers C.S., Pasquerella L., Understanding retirement from a developmental perspective: the case of Mount Holyoke College, Faculty Retirement: Best Practices for Navigating the Transition, pp. 42-51, (2014); Clauss-Ehlers C.S., Serpell Z., Weist M.D., Handbook of Culturally Responsive School Mental Health: Advancing Research, Training, Practice, and Policy, (2013); Davies R.S., Dean D.L., Ball N., Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course, Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 4, pp. 563-580, (2013); Dexter S., Herring M., Thomas T., Editorial: technology leadership for the Teacher Education Initiative, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12, 2, pp. 255-263, (2012); Ellis R., Weyers M., Hughes J., Campus-based student experiences of learning technologies in a first-year science course, British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 5, pp. 745-757, (2013); Floridi L., The Online Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, (2015); Formica S.P., Easley J.L., Spraker M.C., Transforming common-sense beliefs into Newtonian thinking through just-in-time teaching, Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6, 2, (2010); Graham C.R., Woodfield W., Harrison J.B., A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 18, pp. 4-14, (2013); Hedgcock W.H., Rouwenhorst R.M., Clicking their way to success: using student response systems as a tool for feedback, Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 22, 2, pp. 16-25, (2014); Higgins C., Reeves L., Byrd E., Interactive online journaling: a campus-wide implementation of blogging software, pp. 139-142, (2004); Hung H.T., Yuen S.C.Y., Educational use of social networking technology in higher education, Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 6, pp. 703-714, (2010); Kelly G., A collaborative process for evaluating new educational technologies, Campus-wide Information Systems, 25, 2, pp. 105-113, (2008); Kopcha T.J., A systems-based approach to technology and integration using mentoring and communities of practice, Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 58, 2, pp. 175-190, (2010); Lee M., Tsai C., Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web, Instructional Science, 38, 1, pp. 1-21, (2010); Liberatore M.W., Active learning and just-in-time teaching in a material and energy balances course, Chemical Engineering Education, 47, 3, pp. 154-160, (2013); McLoughlin C., Lee M.J.W., Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: international exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 1, pp. 28-43, (2010); Mayberry J., Hargis J., Boles L., Dugas A., O'Neill D., Rivera A., Meler M., Exploring teaching and learning using an iTouch mobile device, Active Learning in Higher Education, 13, 3, pp. 203-217, (2012); Mehta A., Yes you can: offer a comprehensive set of technologies to enhance teaching and learning, pp. 23-28, (2012); Novak G., Patterson E.T., Gavrin A.D., Christian W., Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology, (1999); Oigara J., Keengwe J., Students’ perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning, Education and Information Technologies, 18, 1, pp. 15-28, (2013); Technology, (2017); Paulus T.M., Phipps G., Harrison J., Varga M.A., Re-envisioning instructional technology research in higher education environments: a content analysis of a grant program, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 3, pp. 164-181, (2012); Salter D., Richards L., Carey T., The ‘T5’ design model: an instructional model and learning environment to support the integration of online and campus?based courses, Educational Media International, 41, 3, pp. 207-217, (2004); See S., Conry J.M., Flip my class! A faculty development demonstration of a flipped-classroom, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6, 4, pp. 585-588, (2014); Shih C.L., Chuang H.H., The development and validation of an instrument for assessing college students’ perceptions of faculty knowledge in technology-supported class environments, Computers & Education, 63, pp. 109-118, (2013); Singer K., Digital close reading: TEI for teaching poetic vocabularies, Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 3, 7, pp. 1-39, (2013); Singh G., Hardaker G., Barriers and enablers to adoption and diffusion of eLearning: a systematic review of the literature – a need for an integrative approach, Education+Training, 56, 2-3, pp. 105-121, (2013); Smith-Osborne A., Perceived influence of adoption of personal electronic response systems by students with and without disabilities and limited English proficiency in small social work classes, Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32, 1-2, pp. 54-64, (2014); King A., From sage on the stage to guide on the side, College Teaching, 41, 1, pp. 30-35, (1993); Krathwohl D.R., Revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview, Theory into Practice, 41, 4, pp. 212-218, (2002); Novak G.M., Just-in-time teaching, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, pp. 63-73, (2011)
Nơi xuất bản
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus