CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Consortial collaboration and the creation of an assessment instrument for community-based learning
Tác giả
Murphy M.S.; Flowers K.S.
Năm xuất bản
2017
Source title
Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This article describes the development of the Community-Based Learning (CBL) Scorecard by a grant- funded consortium of liberal arts institutions. The aim of the scorecard was to promote assessment that improves student learning with an instrument that employs a quantitative scale, allowing for benchmarking across institutions. Extensive interviews with faculty who participated in the pilot (Charles & Choi, 2013), including specific perceptions of the value of using the scorecard to assess the students' CBL experience and improve learning outcomes, were reviewed. Results indicated that the CBL Scorecard, with appropriate administration, serves as an adaptable tool for assessment of CBL that can provide timely feedback and reminders of best practices to faculty. Increasing student response rates, the scorecard's value for faculty development, and improving the experience for community partners are discussed. © 2017 by the University of Georgia. All rights reserved.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Angelo T.A., Doing assessment as if learning matters most, AAHE Bulletin, 51, 9, pp. 3-6, (1999); Astin A.W., Vogelgesang L.J., Ikeda E.K., Yee J.A., How service learning affects students, (2000); Banta T.W., Blaich C., Closing the assessment loop, Change: Magazine of Higher Learning, 43, 1, pp. 22-27, (2011); Blaich C., Wise K., From gathering to using assessment results: Lessons from the Wabash National Study (NILOA Occasional Paper No, (2011); Brammer L., Dumlao R., Falk A., Hollander E., Knutson E., Poehnert J., Werner V., Core competencies in civic engagement (A Working Paper in the Center for Engaged Democracy's Policy Papers Series, Merrimack College), (2012); Bringle R.G., Clayton P.H., Hatcher J.A., Research on service learning: An introduction, Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Students and faculty, 2A, pp. 3-25, (2013); Butin D.W., Service-learning in theory and practice: The future of community engagement in higher education, (2010); Charles R., Choi Y.K., Toward an approach to identify effective practices for faculty teaching community-based learning (CBL) courses: A study project for Rhodes College and members of the Teagle-funded Consortium [Capstone report], (2013); Everhart R.S., Teaching tools to improve the development of empathy in service-learning students, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20, 2, pp. 129-154, (2016); Ewell P.T., Assessment, accountability, and improvement: Revisiting the tension (NILOA Occasional Paper No, (2009); Eyler J.S., What do we most need to know about the impact of service-learning on student learning?, pp. 11-17, (2000); Eyler J., The power of experiential education, Liberal Education, 95, 4, pp. 24-31, (2009); Eyler J., Giles D.E., Where's the learning in service-learning?, (1999); Eyler J., Giles D.E., Review essay: The endless quest for scholarly respectability in service-learning research, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 20, 1, pp. 53-64, (2013); Eyler J.S., Giles D.E., Stenson C.M., Gray C.J., At a glance: What we know about the effects of service-learning on college students, faculty, institutions and communities, 1993-2000: Third edition, (2001); Fitch P., Steinke P., Hudson T.D., Research and theoretical perspective on cognitive outcomes of service learning, Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Students and faculty, 2A, pp. 57-83, (2013); Jameson J.K., Clayton P.H., Ash S.L., Conceptualizing, assessing, and investigating academic learning in service learning, Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Students and faculty, 2A, pp. 85-110, (2013); Kuh G.D., Risky business: Promises and pitfalls of institutional transparency, Change, 39, 5, pp. 30-35, (2007); Mackaway J.A., Winchester-Seeto T., Coulson D., Harvey M., Practical and pedagogical aspects of learning through participation: The LTP assessment design framework, (2011); McDonald B., Assessment in service-learning, (2012); Ming A.C.C., Lee W.K.M., Ka C.M.H., Service-learning model at Lingnan University: Development strategies and outcome assessment, New Horizons in Education, 57, 3, pp. 57-73, (2009); Molee L.M., Henry M.E., Sessa V.I., McKinney-Prupis E.R., Assessing learning in service-learning courses through critical reflection, Journal of Experiential Education, 33, 3, pp. 239-257, (2010); Assessing community-based learning (CBL) in liberal arts colleges: Year 2 progress report, (2010); Assessing community-based learning (CBL) in liberal arts colleges: Year 5 progress report, (2013); Systematic assessment of student learning in community-based learning programming: Report on an assessment planning grant to Rhodes College, Niagara University and Franklin and Marshall College, (2008); Shapiro D.F., Collaborative faculty assessment of service-learning student work to improve student and faculty learning and course design, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19, 1, pp. 44-57, (2012); Zhang G., Zeller N., Griffith R., Metcalf D., Williams J., Shea C., Misulis K., Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15, 4, pp. 57-84, (2011)
Nơi xuất bản
University of Georgia
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus