CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Educating "modern mind" in the light of the evolution of western educational thought
Tác giả
Bulle N.
Năm xuất bản
2017
Source title
Historical Social Research
Số trích dẫn
5
DOI
10.12759/hsr.42.2017.4.253-279
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
My thesis is that liberal and progressive education models respectively refer to dual and unitary conceptions of intellectual development, and that these differences account for their pedagogical antagonisms. I test the validity of this argument by using it to account for the evolution of Western pedagogy and the fate of liberal and progressive education. I introduce the dualist epistemologica! premises of the major educational models that have followed one after the other in the history of Western education. Then, I account for the impact of classical empiricism, and later evolutionary doctrines, on the discredit of liberal education and the emergence of educational progressivem. Progressive educational conceptions are rooted in a representation of humankind developed under the influence of the Darwinian revolution. They justify an adaptive model of the mind within the framework of a functionalist psychology. According to alternative currents of modern educational thought, the use of auxiliary means of thought marks a rupture with human biological development. These currents underpin a dual conception of human reason according to which rational or theoretical understanding is a sui generis dimension of thought. They offer support for a modernized version of liberal education. © GESIS.
Từ khóa
Curriculum; Epistemology; Intellectual development; Liberal education; Progressive education
Tài liệu tham khảo
David A., Examining the basis for competency-based education, The Journal of Higher Education, 4, pp. 321-332, (1977); Anderson John R., Reder L.M., Simon H.A., Situated learning and education, Educational Researcher, 25, pp. 5-11, (1996); Angeli James R., The influence of darwin on psychology, Psychological Review, 16, pp. 152-219, (1909); Ausubel David P., Learning by discovery: Rationale and mystique, NASSP Bulletin, 45, pp. 18-58, (1961); Ausubel David P., In defense of verbal learning, Educational Theory, pp. 15-25, (1961); Gaston B., L'Activité Rationaliste de la Physique Contemporaine, (1951); Bagley William C., The Educative Process, (1905); Baldwin James M., Genetic Theory of Reality, (1915); Robert B., Articulating Reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism, (2000); Brown John S., Collins A., Duguid P., Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educational Researcher, 18, pp. 32-42, (1989); Natalie B., L'École et Son Double. Essai sur l'Évolution Pédagogique en France, (2009); Natalie B., Slow and fast thinking, historical-cultural psychology and major trends of modern epistemology: Analysis of a fundamental convergence, Mind and Society, 13, 1, pp. 149-166, (2014); Ferdinand B., Education et Instruction, (1885); Jacques C., Erasme et platon, Bulletin de l'Association Guillaume Budé, 1, pp. 25-48, (1987); Commager Henry S., The American Mind. An Interpretation of American Thought and Character since the 1880's, (1950); Gabriel C., Histoire de la Pédagogie, (1886); Corballis Michael C., The Recursive Mind. The Origins of Human Language, Thought and Civilization, (2011); Lawrence C., The Transformation of the School. Progressivism in American Education 1876-1957, (1962); Henryj C., What can be done to make the study of physics a better training for power?, The School Review, 8, 9, pp. 520-527, (1900); Davydov Vasily V., Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula, Soviet Studies in Mathematics Education 2, (1972); Rene D., Méditations Métaphysiques. Méditations Touchant la Philosophie Première, dans Lesquelles on Prouve Clairement l'Existence de Dieu et la Distinction Réelle Entre l'Âme et le Corps de l'Homme, (1908); Jan D., Abstract rationality in education: From vygotsky to brandom, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, pp. 49-62, (2008); Jan D., Vygotsky, Philosophy and Education, (2013); John D., How do concepts arise from percepts?, Public School Journal, 11, pp. 128-130, (1891); John D., The Child and the Curriculum, (1902); John D., Democracy and Education, (1917); John D., The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action, (1929); John D., Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, (1938); Emile D., L ' Évolution Pédagogique en France, (1938); Kieran E., Getting It Wrong from the Beginning: Our Progressivist Inheritance from Herbert Spencer, John Dewey and Jean Piaget, (2004); Albert E., On the method of theoretical physics, Philosophy of Science, 1, pp. 163-169, (1934); Albert E., Infeld L., The Evolution of Physics, (1938); Ernst G., Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching, Synthese so, 1, pp. 121-140, (1989); Green Christopher D., Darwinian theory, functionalism, and the first American psychological revolution, American Psychologist, 64, pp. 75-82, (2009); Greeno James G., Smith D.R., Moore J.L., Transfer of situated learning, Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction, pp. 97-167, (1992); Ilsetraut H., Arts Libéraux et Philosophie dans la Pensée Antique. Contribution À v Histoire de l'Éducation et de la Culture dans l'Antiquité, (1984); William H., The Progressive Education Movement: Is It Still A Factor in Today's Schools?, (2006); Hirst Paul H., Liberal education and the nature of knowledge, Philosophical Analysis and Education, (1965); Hirst Paul H., The logical and psychological aspects of teaching a subject, The Concept of Education, (1967); Hirst Paul H., Knowledge and the Curriculum, (1974); Hmelo-Silver Cindy E., Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?, Educational Psychology Review, 16, 3, pp. 235-266, (2004); Hodge Frederick A., John Locke and Formal Discipline, (1911); Philippe H., Formes de culture, programmes et pensée pédagogique à la fin de l'Antiquité, La Crise de la Culture Scolaire, pp. 15-44, (2005); David H., 4 Treatise of Human Nature, (1739); William J., The Principles of Psychology, (1890); William J., Essays in Radical Empiricism, (1912); Kimball Bruce A., Liberal versus useful education: Reconsidering the contrast and its lineage, Teachers College Record, 87, pp. 575-587, (1986); Kilpatrick William H., Education for A Changing Civilization. Three Lectures Delivered on the Luther Laflin Kellogg Foundation at Rutgers University, (1926); Otto K., A History of Psychology, (1914); Kolesnik Walter B., Mental Discipline in Modern Education, (1958); Krug Edward A., The Shaping of the American High School, (1964); Jean L., Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life, (1988); John L., An Essay on Man Understanding, (1979); John L., Of the conduct of understanding, Locke's Conduct of Understanding, (1706); Liping M., Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers' Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States, (2010); Maurice M., History, Man and Reason, A Study in Ninetenth Century Thought, (1971); Henry M., The Nature of Physical Reality. A Philosophy of Modern Physics, (1950); Matthews Michael R., Science Teaching. The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, (1994); McDonald Frederick J., The influence of learning theories on education, The Sixty-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Theories of Learning and Instruction, pp. 1-26, (1964); Meyer Derek L., The poverty of constructivism, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41, 3, pp. 332-341, (2009); Emile M., Identité et Réalité, (1908); Emile M., De l'Explication dans les Sciences, (1921); Millerrving E., The Psychology Oj Thinking, (1915); Nigel N., The trouble with competence, Cambridge Journal of Education, 91, 21, pp. 331-342, (1991); Noble David W., The Paradox of Progressive Thought, (1958); Northrop Filmer S.C., The Meeting of East and West. An Inquiry Concerning: World Understanding, (1946); Northrop Filmer S.C., The Logic of the Sciences and the Humanities, (1947); Northrop Filmer S.C., Philosophical Anthropology and Practical Politics, (1960); Philippe P., Construire des Compétences dès l'École, (1997); Pestalozzi Johann H., Comment Gertrude Instruit Ses Enfants, (1801); Philips P., The uses of the disciplines as curriculum content, Educational Forum, 26, pp. 273-280, (1962); Phillips Denis C., Constructivism in Education. Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues. Ninety-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, (2000); Jean P., Le Jugement Moral Chez l'Enfant, (1932); Jean P., Biologie et Connaissance. Essai sur les Relations Entre les Régulations Organiques et les Processus Cognitifs, (1967); Plato, Republic, (2004); Karl P., Objective Knowledge, (1972); Resnick Lauren B., Levine J.M., Teasly S.D., Perpectives on Socially Shared Cognition, (1991); Barbara R., Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context, (1990); Jean-Jacques R., Emile Ou de l'Éducation, (1762); Schwab Joseph J., The nature of scientific knowledge as related to liberal education, The Journal of General Education, 3, 4, pp. 245-266, (1949); Herbert S., Education: Intellectual, Moral and Physical, (1860); Tobias Sigmund T., Duffy T.M., Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure?, (2009); Gerard V., La théorie des champs conceptuels, Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 10, pp. 133-170, (1990); Vygotsky Lev S., Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, (1978); Vygotski Lev S., Pensée et Langage, (1934); Max W., Economie et Société, (1922); Woodward William H., Desiderius Erasmus Concerning the Aim and Method of Education, (1904)
Nơi xuất bản
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus