The humanities in Australia: Past, present and future
Donnelly K.
2017
The Humanities: Past, Present and Future
0
In the history of Western education, the liberal-humanist tradition - in its diverse forms - has probably exercised the most pervasive theoretical influence (Crittenden, 1988, p 5). Beginning in the late 1960s to early 1970s the nature and place of the humanities, best illustrated by how literature and history are conceptualised and taught in Australian schools, have been radically re-defined. Reflecting changes at the university level the liberal-humanist approach, represented by a liberal education embodied in Matthew Arnold’s phrase “the best that’s been thought and said” (Arnold, 1969, p 6), has been incrementally replaced by a range of cultural-left ’theories’ ranging from Neo-Marxist and postmodern and deconstructionist to feminist, post-colonial and gender and sexuality theories. As a result humanities subjects are no longer considered inherently worthwhile or taught for their own sake as essential elements of what it means to be educated. Subjects like literature and history are deconstructed as socio-cultural constructs that reflect the supposed hegemony of various dominant elites that marginalise and oppress the disadvantaged and reinforce the status quo. Illustrated by a number of submissions to the 2014 review of the Australian National Curriculum there is a call to reassert the importance of the humanities within the context of a liberal view of education. A view of education that is not immediately utilitarian or defined by the cultural-left but one that addresses what it means to be educated in its broadest sense. Responses critical of the Australian National Curriculum also argue that there should be a greater focus on teaching literature and history within the Western tradition associated with a liberal education. Critical, in this regard, is education inculcating what Cardinal Newman describes as a particular habit of mind involving “freedom, equitableness, calmness, moderation, and wisdom; or what in a previous discourse I have ventured to call a philosophical habit” (Newman, 1852, p 127). In response to defining education in terms of 21st century learning, represented by the new digital technologies and the changing nature of employment and work, an argument is also put that the knowledge, dispositions and skills associated with a liberal education are increasingly necessary and relevant. So-called transferable competencies and generic skills, on the whole, are context specific and are best acquired in the context of the established disciplines. © 2017 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Abetz P., (2014); What’s Changed., (2017); Arnold M., Culture & Anarchy, (1969); Review of the Australian Curriculum Final Report, (2014); Barcan A., Sociological Theory and Educational Reality., (1993); Barcan A., Ideology and the Curriculum, Education and the Ideal, (2004); Bendle M., Academic vilified for Islam scrutiny, The Australian., (2012); Bendle M., The Suicide of the West, Quadrant Online., (2016); Bennett J.W., The Book of Virtues, (1993); ‘The Ministerial Review of Post-Compulsory Schooling Report, 1, (1985); Bloom A., The Democratization of the University, Giants and Dwarfs Essays 1960-1990., (1990); Campbell J., The Power of Myth, (1991); Carroll J., How I Become a Political Conservative., (2015); Clark A., Teaching the Nation: Politics and Pedagogy in Australian History, (2006); Coleridge S.T., Biographia Literaria, The Portable Coleridge, (1950); Cranny-Francis A., The Value of Genre’, English in Australia, 99, (1992); Crittenden B., Liberal Education and the Role of Schools., (1988); Donnelly K., Why Our Schools are Failing, (2004); Donnelly K., It’s All Depths and Deconstruction., (2006); Eagleton T., Literary Theory: An Introduction, (1983); Green B., Post curriculum possibilities; English teaching, cultural politics and the postmodern turn, Published In: Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27, 4, pp. 391-409, (1995); Eliot T.S., Notes Towards a Definition of Culture, (1948); Hansen I.V., The Water and the Wave, (1979); Howard J., Gift from a True Champion of Western Civilisation., (2017); Submission to the Review of the National Curriculum. Melbourne, Institute of Public Affairs, (2014); The End of history… in Australian Universities; Foundation of Western Civilisation Program, (2017); Lasch C., The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy, (1996); Lawrence D.H., Selected Literary Criticism, (1956); Leavis F.R., The Great Tradition, (1948); Macintyre S., The History Wars, (2003); Markwell D., A Large and Liberal Education, (2007); Melleuish G., History in the National Curriculum: No Focus, No Story., (2010); The National Curriculum a Critique, (2010); Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians, (2008); Misson R., Some Comments on Teaching Popular Texts, Idiom., 2, (1989); English Stage 6 Syllabus, (1999); Newman J.H., The Idea of a University Defined and Illustrated, (1852); Patai D., Corral W.H., Theory’s Empire: An Anthology of Dissent, (2005); Patterson A., Teaching Literature in Australia: Examining and Reviewing Senior English. Published in, Changing English, 15, 3, pp. 311-322, (2008); Peel M., Appendix C: The Essentials of Australian History., (2000); Taylor T., The Future of the Past: Final Report of the National Inquiry into School History, (2000); Piggin S., Submission to the Review of the National Curriculum, (2014); Queensland English Extension Senior Syllabus 2011, (2011); Reid I., The Making of Literature, (1984); Rosenblatt M.L., The Reader the Text the Poem, (1978); Ryckmans P., The View from the Bridge, (1996); Sherrington G., Forsyth H., Ideas of a Liberal Education an Essay on Elite and Mass Higher Education, On the Purpose of a University Education. S, (2012); Spurr B., Subject Matter Specialist Report on the Australian Curriculum: English., (2014); The Victorian Readers, (1928); Watson K., English Teaching in Perspective, (1981); Williams R., Culture, (1986)
Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Book chapter
Scopus