CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
The value of philosophy in a liberal arts education
Tác giả
Hillman T.A.; Borland T.
Năm xuất bản
2016
Source title
Journal for the Liberal Arts and Sciences
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
What is the value of philosophy, particularly within the setting of a liberal arts education? Before we can answer this question, we first need to determine (a) how philosophy is best defined in terms of its nature and scope, and then (b) precisely what a liberal arts education is or should be. Only then will we be able to see what the value of philosophy is, or might be, in a liberal arts curriculum more generally. This paper offers an answer to the above question, with an extended discussion concerning the nature of philosophy and its current role in the liberal arts.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aristotle, Metaphysics, (1998); Ballard E., The subject matter of philosophy, Tulane Studies in Philosophy, 7, 1958, (1958); Beardsley M., Intrinsic value, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 26, pp. 1-17, (1965); Blackburn S., Think, (1999); Blanshard B., Reason & Analysis, (1964); Chisholm R., Intrinsic value, Values and Morals, pp. 121-130, (1978); What is liberal education?, Christendom College, (2013); Cicero, On duties, Ethical Writings of Cicero, (1883); Cronon W., Only connect": The goals of a liberal education, The American Scholar, 67, 4, pp. 73-80, (1998); Encyclopedia Britannica, (2013); Friedman T., Tom friedman on education in a "Flat world, The School Administrator, 65, 2, (2008); Holmes A., The Idea of A Christian College Revised Edition, (1987); Kagan D., Ave atque vale, The New Criterion, 31, (2013); Kelly T., Following the argument where It leads, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 154, 1, pp. 105-124, (2011); Kimball B., Naming pragmatic liberal education, Education and Democracy: Re-imagining Liberal Learning in America, pp. 45-68, (1997); Murphy M., The natural law tradition in ethics, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (2013); Nagel T., What Does It All Mean? A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy, (1987); Newman J.H., The Idea of A University, (1996); Nozick R., What is wisdom and why Do philosophers love It So?, His the Examined Life, pp. 267-278, (1989); Philosophy (Noun), (2013); Paris D., Kimball B., Liberal education: An overlapping pragmatic consensus, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 2, pp. 143-158, (2000); Passmore J., Philosophy, Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 6, (1967); Physics Central, (2013); Plato, Republic, Plato"s Republic, (1992); Pojman L., Feiser J., Edition, (2007); Priest G., What is philosophy?, Philosophy, 81, 316, pp. 189-207, (2006); Redding P., Philosophy is not a "Ridiculous" pursuit. It is worth funding, The Guardian Online, (2013); Russell B., A History of Western Philosophy, (1945); Sellars W., Philosophy and the scientific image of man, Frontiers in Science and Philosophy, (1962); Strauss L., What is liberal education?, Address at Tenth Annual Graduation Exercises at University of Chicago, (1959); Vergerrio P., De Ingenuis Moribus, Vittorino da Feltre and Other Humanist Educators, pp. 93-118, (1912); Warburton N., Without conversation, philosophy is dogma, Aeon Magazine Online, (2013); Zakaria F., Defense of A Liberal Education, (2015)
Nơi xuất bản
School of Education,Oakland City University
Hình thức xuất bản
Review
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus