Fostering Interdisciplinary Thinking Through an International Development Case Study
Ellett R.L.; Esperanza J.; Phan D.
2016
Journal of Political Science Education
1
10.1080/15512169.2015.1071263
Despite widespread acknowledgment of the importance of interdisciplinary pedagogy, disciplinary teaching remains the norm on most campuses, primarily due to cost and institutional constraints. Bridging the gap between literature on interdisciplinary teaching and active-learning techniques, this article describes an innovative and less costly approach through the linkage of case-study active-learning techniques with interdisciplinary principles at a small liberal arts college. We apply this student-centered approach to teaching international development, a field that critically needs integration across several social sciences. A practical way for political scientists to encourage undergraduate-level interdisciplinary thinking is to develop a case study that asks students to utilize practical problem-solving skills and policy analysis. We analyze the implementation and assessment of such a case study, discuss its successes and shortcomings and provide suggestions for expanded implementation. We also discuss the broad applicability of this approach to topics that require integration across disciplines in a variety of institutional settings. © 2016, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Active learning; case study; interdisciplinary; international development; simulation
Asal V., Blake E., Creating Simulations for Political Science Education, Journal of Political Science Education, 2, 1, pp. 1-18, (2006); Boehrer J., Linsky M., Teaching with Cases: Learning to Question, The Changing Face of College Teaching, (1990); Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, (2004); Davis L.J., The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, 40, (2007); Dolgas C., (2012); Foran J., The Case Method and the Interactive Classroom NEA, Higher Education Journal, (2001); Frederking B., Simulations and Student Learning, Journal of Political Science Education, 1, 3, pp. 385-393, (2005); Ivanitskaya L., Clark D., Montgomery G., Primeau R., Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes, Innovative Higher Education, 27, 2, pp. 95-111, (2002); Krometis L.-A.H., Clark E.P., Gonzalez V., Leslie M.E., The ‘Death’ of Disciplines: Development of a Team-Taught Course to Provide an Interdisciplinary Perspective for First-Year Students, College Teaching, 59, 2, pp. 73-78, (2011); Lattuca L., Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching Among College and University Faculty, (2001); Lattuca L., Voight L., Fath K., Does Interdisciplinarity Promote Learning?: Theoretical Support and Researchable Questions, The Review of Higher Education, 28, 1, pp. 23-48, (2004); Omelicheva M., Self- and Peer-Evaluation in Undergraduate Education: Structuring Conditions That Maximize Its Promises and Minimize the Perils, Journal of Political Science Education, 1, 1, pp. 191-206, (2005); Shellman S., Turan K., Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning?: An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation, Journal of Political Science Education, 2, 1, pp. 19-32, (2006); Smith E.T., Boyer M.A., Designing In-Class Simulations, PS: Political Science and Politics, 29, 4, pp. 690-694, (1996); Stone L.S., Stone T.M., Community-Based Tourism Enterprises: Challenges and Prospects for Community Participation; Khama Rhino Sanctuary Trust, Botswana, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19, 1, pp. 97-114, (2011)
Routledge
Article
Scopus