CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Does independent research with a faculty member enhance four-year graduation and graduate/professional degree plans? Convergent results with different analytical methods

Tác giả

Kilgo C.A.; Pascarella E.T.

Năm xuất bản

2016

Source title

Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

24

DOI

10.1007/s10734-015-9925-3

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84937604258&doi=10.1007%2fs10734-015-9925-3&partnerID=40&md5=92d2cda644f8bbae44c741f73da83010

Tóm tắt

This study examines the effects of undergraduate students participating in independent research with faculty members on four-year graduation and graduate/professional degree aspirations. We analyzed four-year longitudinal data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education using multiple analytic techniques. The findings support the positive, net link between undergraduate research and fourth-year graduate degree aspirations and suggest that such involvement may have potential as a powerful programmatic and pedagogical tool. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Từ khóa

High-impact practices; Independent research with a faculty mentor; Student learning; Undergraduate research

Tài liệu tham khảo

Astin A.W., What matters in college: Four critical years revisited, (1993); Bauer K.W., Bennett J.S., Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience, The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 2, pp. 210-230, (2003); Blaich C.F., Wabash national study, (2011); Boyer Commissionon Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities, (1998); Brownell J.E., Swaner L.E., Five high-impact practices: Research on learning outcomes, completion, and quality, (2010); Cabrera A., Logistic regression analysis in higher education, Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, pp. 225-250, (1994); About CUR, Retrieved from:, (2013); Elgren T., Hensel N., Undergraduate research experiences: Synergies between scholarship and teaching. Peer review, (2006); Hanson J., Weeden D., Pascarella E., Blaich C., Do liberal arts colleges make students more liberal? Some initial evidence, Higher Education, 64, pp. 355-369, (2012); Katkin W., The Boyer Commission Report and its impact on undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 93, 19–38, (2003); Kilgo C.A., Sheets J.K.E., Pascarella E.T., The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence, Higher Education, 69, 4, pp. 509-525, (2014); Kinkead J., Kinkead J., Learning through inquiry: An overview of undergraduate research, Valuing and supporting undergraduate research, pp. 5-18, (2005); Kinzie J., Undergraduate research: High impact practice for all students (power point slides). Presented at the Association of American Colleges and Universities working conference, undergraduate research across the disciplines. Durham, NC, Retrieved from:, (2010); Kuh G.D., High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter, (2008); Kuh G.D., O'Donnell K., Ensuring quality and taking high-impact practices to scale, (2013); Merkel C.A., Undergraduate research at the research universities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 93, 39–53, (2003); National Survey of Student Engagement, Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success, (2007); Pascarella E., College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis.  In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education:  Handbook of theory and research (pp. 1–61), New York:  Agathon, (1985); Pascarella E.T., Terenzini P., How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research, (1991); Pascarella E.T., Terenzini P., How college affects students (Vol, 2): A third decade of research, (2005); Padgett R., Salisbury M., An B., Pascarella E., Required, practical, or unnecessary? An examination and demonstration of propensity score matching using longitudinal secondary data. New Directions for Institutional Research–Assessment Supplement (pp, 29–42), (2010); Pascarella E., Salisbury M., Blaich C., Design and analysis in college impact research: Which counts more?, Journal of College Student Development, 54, pp. 329-335, (2013); Prince M.J., Felder R.M., Brent R., Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies, Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 4, pp. 283-294, (2007); Raudenbush S., Bryk A., Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, (2001); Reynolds C., DesJardins S., The use of matching methods in higher education research: Answering whether attendance at a 2-year institution results in differences in educational attainment, Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, pp. 47-104, (2009); Russell S.H., Hancock M.P., McCullough J., Benefits of undergraduate research, Education Forum: Science Magazine, 316, pp. 548-549, (2007); Seymour E., Hunter A.-B., Laursen S.L., Deantoni T., Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study, Science Education, 88, pp. 493-534, (2004); Tinto V., Leaving college, (1993); Tinto V., Completing college: Rethinking institutional action, (2012); Winship C., Radbill L., Sampling weights and regression analysis, Sociological Methods and Research, 23, pp. 230-257, (1994)

Nơi xuất bản

Springer Netherlands

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus