CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
K-12 teachers’ perceptions of barriers and benefts in technology usage
Tác giả
Todd C.; Carver L.B.
Năm xuất bản
2016
Source title
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This study explores K-12 teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and barriers to technology integration by either teachers or students in K-12 instruction. The sample was composed of 68 students enrolled in online classes in the graduate studies in education department of a small private liberal arts institution in the southeast. Data was collected using an anonymous, online survey. Open and axial coding was used to identify themes in barriers and benefits in both student and teacher technology use. Even with the emphasis on providing 1:1 technology, availability of technology was most frequently identified barrier, while increased engagement was the most frequently identified benefit. Content instructional issues or teacher knowledge were not as stronger identified barriers or benefits. © The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson R.E., Ronnkvist A., The presence of computers in American schools. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 Survey Report, (1999); Ertmer P.A., Addison P., Lane M., Ross E., Woods D., Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 1, pp. 54-71, (1999); Ertmer P.A., Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?, Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 4, pp. 25-39, (2005); Florida technology goals, (2006); Hew K., Brush T., Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research, Educational Technology Research & Development, 55, 3, pp. 223-252, (2007); Hutchison A., Reinking D., Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States, Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 4, pp. 312-333, (2011); Fast Facts: Educational Technology, National Center for Education Statistics, (2010); National Assessment of Educational Progress. National Center for Education Statistics, (2013); Kozma R.B., Technology and classroom practices: An international study, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 1, pp. 1-14, (2003); Moradi-Rekabdarkolaei S., The comparison of ICT literacy between teachers and students and presenting a model for development of ICT in schools, Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 8, 4, pp. 43-54, (2011); Nyagowa H., Ocholla D., Mutula S., The influence of infrastructure, training, content, and communication on the success of NEPAD’s pilot e-schools in Kenya, Information Development, 30, 3, pp. 235-246, (2013); Orlando J., ICT-mediated practice and constructivist practices: Is this still the best plan for teachers’ uses of ICT?, Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 22, 2, pp. 231-246, (2013); Patton M.Q., Qualitative research & evaluation methods, (2002); Robinson R.D., McKenna M.C., Conradi K., Issues and trends in literacy education, (2012); Spektor-Levy O., Granot-Gilat Y., The impact of learning with laptops in 1:1 classes on the development of learning skills and information literacy among middle school students, Interdisciplinary Journal of ELearning and Learning Objects, 8, 1, pp. 83-96, (2012); Warschauer M., Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom, (2006); The testing industry’s big four, (2014)
Nơi xuất bản
Sakarya University
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus