CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
A Politically Liberal Conception of Formal Education in a Developing Democracy
Tác giả
Çelik R.
Năm xuất bản
2016
Source title
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Số trích dẫn
3
DOI
10.1080/00131857.2015.1041011
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Abstract: As discussed by John Rawls, in a well-ordered society, a public political culture’s wide educational role bears the primary responsibility for developing reasonable individuals for the stability of a politically liberal society. Rawlsian scholars have also focused on the stability and enhancement of developed liberal democratic societies by means of those societies’ education systems. In this sense, one thing that is common to Rawlsian scholars’ and Rawls’s own understanding of the role of education appears to be a concern over the stability of a politically liberal society since it is highly dependent on the character of its citizens. Also, it is usually believed that a politically liberal account of education can be implemented in a developed politically liberal society. In contrast, this study discusses the possibility of implementing a politically liberal account of education in a developing liberal society that may become a developed liberal democracy under an overlapping consensus. © 2015 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia.
Từ khóa
developing democracy; John Rawls; political liberalism; politically liberal education
Tài liệu tham khảo
Brighouse H., Civic education and liberal legitimacy, Ethics, 108, pp. 719-745, (1998); Brighouse H., Justice, (2004); Bull B.L., A politically liberal conception of civic education, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, pp. 449-460, (2008); Bull B.L., A sketch of politically liberal principles of social justice in higher education, Philosophical Studies in Education, 43, pp. 26-38, (2012); Costa M.V., rawlsian civic education: Political not minimal, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21, 1, pp. 1-14, (2004); Final declaration and action plan, (1997); Declaration and programme on education for democratic citizenship, based on the rights and responsibilities of citizens, (1999); Presidency conclusion, (2000); Fernandez C., Sundstrom M., Citizenship education and liberalism: A state of the debate analysis 1990–2010, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30, pp. 363-384, (2011); Grek S., Lawn M., Lingard B., Ozga J., Rinne R., Segerholm C., Hannu S., National policy brokering and the construction of the European Education Space in England, Sweden, Finland and Scotland, Comparative Education, 45, pp. 5-21, (2009); Halliday J., Reason, education and liberalism: Family resemblance within an overlapping consensus, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20, pp. 225-234, (2001); Holford J., Hard measures for soft stuff: Citizenship indicators and educational policy under the Lisbon strategy, European Educational Research Journal, 7, pp. 331-343, (2008); Macedo S., Liberal civic education and religious fundamentalism: The case of God v. John Rawls?, Ethics, 105, pp. 468-496, (1995); Nozick R., Anarchy, state, and utopia, (1974); Rawls J., A theory of justice, (1971); Rawls J., Political liberalism, (1993); Rawls J., Lectures on the history of moral philosophy, (2000); Rawls J., Justice as fairness: A restatement, (2001); Reidy D., Education for citizenship in a pluralist liberal democracy, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 30, pp. 25-42, (1996); Schimmelfennig F., Scholtz H., EU democracy promotion in the european neighbourhood: Political conditionality, economic development and transnational exchange, European Union Politics, 9, pp. 187-215, (2008); Strike K.A., Education policy and the just society, (1982); Strike K.A., On the construction of public speech: Pluralism and public reason, Educational Theory, 44, 1, pp. 1-26, (1994)
Nơi xuất bản
Routledge
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus